Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Effectiveness of placing prophylactic mesh with the Sugarbaker technique via laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of parastomal hernia prevention with the Sugarbaker technique via laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer after a one-year follow-up at University Medical Center in Ho Chi Minh City.
Patients and methods: Intervention study. Between 11/2018 and 7/2022, 43 patients with low rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and were divided into two groups: intervention (n = 15) with prophylactic mesh placement using the Sugarbaker technique and control (n = 28). All patients were tracked for at least a year and had an abdominal computed tomography scan. The Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate the rate of parastomal hernia after one year. To compare the rates of parastomal hernia in two groups, the logrank test was used.
Results: This study included 43 patients; the male to female ratio was approximately equal to 1:1; the median age was 62; the youngest age was 40; and the oldest age was 92. Rectal cancer stage III was found in 41.8% of people. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was used in 27.9% of cases. The average duration of operation was 184 minutes. The average time for mesh placement was 15 minutes. The overall complication rate was 16.4%. There were no issues with mesh placement. At one year, the control group had a higher cumulative rate of parastomal hernia than the intervention group (35.7% versus 0%, logrank 6.4, p = 0.01).
Conclusions: Prophylactic mesh placement using the Sugarbaker technique during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cacner is safe, does not increase complications, and reduces the cumulative rate of a parastomal hernia at 1 year in patients who have undergone prophylactic mesh placement.
Keywords: Prophylactic mesh placement, Sugarbaker technique, Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.
Vietnam Association for Surgery and Endolaparosurgery
Title: Effectiveness of placing prophylactic mesh with the Sugarbaker technique via laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
Description:
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of parastomal hernia prevention with the Sugarbaker technique via laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer after a one-year follow-up at University Medical Center in Ho Chi Minh City.
Patients and methods: Intervention study.
Between 11/2018 and 7/2022, 43 patients with low rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and were divided into two groups: intervention (n = 15) with prophylactic mesh placement using the Sugarbaker technique and control (n = 28).
All patients were tracked for at least a year and had an abdominal computed tomography scan.
The Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate the rate of parastomal hernia after one year.
To compare the rates of parastomal hernia in two groups, the logrank test was used.
Results: This study included 43 patients; the male to female ratio was approximately equal to 1:1; the median age was 62; the youngest age was 40; and the oldest age was 92.
Rectal cancer stage III was found in 41.
8% of people.
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was used in 27.
9% of cases.
The average duration of operation was 184 minutes.
The average time for mesh placement was 15 minutes.
The overall complication rate was 16.
4%.
There were no issues with mesh placement.
At one year, the control group had a higher cumulative rate of parastomal hernia than the intervention group (35.
7% versus 0%, logrank 6.
4, p = 0.
01).
Conclusions: Prophylactic mesh placement using the Sugarbaker technique during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cacner is safe, does not increase complications, and reduces the cumulative rate of a parastomal hernia at 1 year in patients who have undergone prophylactic mesh placement.
Keywords: Prophylactic mesh placement, Sugarbaker technique, Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.
Related Results
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
<p dir="ltr">In recent decades, rectal cancer treatment has shifted from traditional surgical resection to include additional modalities such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy...
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
<p dir="ltr">In recent decades, rectal cancer treatment has shifted from traditional surgical resection to include additional modalities such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy...
Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: The myth of reinventing the wheel
Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: The myth of reinventing the wheel
Background & Objective: To review oncological outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (LAP-ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.In locally advanced low rectal c...
Contributions to bluetooth low energy mesh networks
Contributions to bluetooth low energy mesh networks
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) has become a popular Internet of Things (IoT) technology. However, it was originally designed to only support the star topology. This PhD thesis investig...
Feasibility of Perineal Defect Reconstruction with Simplified Fasciocutaneous Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) Flaps after Tumor Resection of the Lower Rectum: Incidence and Outcome in an Interdisciplinary Approach
Feasibility of Perineal Defect Reconstruction with Simplified Fasciocutaneous Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) Flaps after Tumor Resection of the Lower Rectum: Incidence and Outcome in an Interdisciplinary Approach
Background: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) is a relatively new surgical technique for low rectal cancers, enabling a more radical approach than conventional abdomin...
Mesh-Associated Pain Syndrome: Predictors for Continence and Prolapse Mesh Removal Surgery in a Single Centre
Mesh-Associated Pain Syndrome: Predictors for Continence and Prolapse Mesh Removal Surgery in a Single Centre
Objective:Over the last two decades the main surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery was the insertion of non-absorbable me...
Mesh-associated pain syndrome: predictors for continence and prolapse mesh removal surgery in a single centre
Mesh-associated pain syndrome: predictors for continence and prolapse mesh removal surgery in a single centre
Abstract
Objective
Over the last two decades one of the main surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP...
Risk Factors for Anorectal Dysfunction After Interspincteric Resection in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer
Risk Factors for Anorectal Dysfunction After Interspincteric Resection in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer
Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the risk factors for anorectal dysfunction after intersphincteric resection in patients with low rectal cancer.Methods: A total ...

