Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Enhancing Intraoral Scanning Accuracy: From the Influencing Factors to a Procedural Guideline

View through CrossRef
Background/Objectives: Intraoral scanning, a fast-evolving technology, is increasingly integrated into actual dental workflows due to its numerous advantages. Despite its growing adoption, challenges related to the accuracy of digital impressions remain. The existing literature identifies most of the factors influencing intraoral scanning accuracy (defined by precision and trueness), but it is fragmented and lacks a unified synthesis. In response to this gap, the present study aims to consolidate and structure the current evidence on the determinant factors and, based on these findings, to develop a clinically applicable procedural guideline for dental practitioners. Methods: A comprehensive literature review identified 43 distinct factors influencing intraoral scanning. Results: These factors encompass variables such as software versions and updates, implant characteristics (e.g., position, angulation, scan body design), materials, environmental conditions (e.g., lighting), and procedural elements including scanning strategy, pattern, aids, and operator experience. Subsequently, these identified factors were systematically classified into five distinct groups based on inherent similarities and relevance within the scanning workflow: IOS—characteristics and maintenance, intraoral morphology, materials, ambient conditions, and scanning strategy. To translate these findings into a practical framework, a four-step protocol was developed, designed for straightforward application by researchers and clinicians. Conclusions: This protocol—comprising: (1) Maintenance, (2) Evaluation, (3) Establishment and Execution of Scanning Strategy, and (4) Verification—aims to guide users effectively through the intraoral scanning process, mitigate common clinical challenges, and ensure broad applicability across diverse scanner systems, irrespective of the manufacturer or model.
Title: Enhancing Intraoral Scanning Accuracy: From the Influencing Factors to a Procedural Guideline
Description:
Background/Objectives: Intraoral scanning, a fast-evolving technology, is increasingly integrated into actual dental workflows due to its numerous advantages.
Despite its growing adoption, challenges related to the accuracy of digital impressions remain.
The existing literature identifies most of the factors influencing intraoral scanning accuracy (defined by precision and trueness), but it is fragmented and lacks a unified synthesis.
In response to this gap, the present study aims to consolidate and structure the current evidence on the determinant factors and, based on these findings, to develop a clinically applicable procedural guideline for dental practitioners.
Methods: A comprehensive literature review identified 43 distinct factors influencing intraoral scanning.
Results: These factors encompass variables such as software versions and updates, implant characteristics (e.
g.
, position, angulation, scan body design), materials, environmental conditions (e.
g.
, lighting), and procedural elements including scanning strategy, pattern, aids, and operator experience.
Subsequently, these identified factors were systematically classified into five distinct groups based on inherent similarities and relevance within the scanning workflow: IOS—characteristics and maintenance, intraoral morphology, materials, ambient conditions, and scanning strategy.
To translate these findings into a practical framework, a four-step protocol was developed, designed for straightforward application by researchers and clinicians.
Conclusions: This protocol—comprising: (1) Maintenance, (2) Evaluation, (3) Establishment and Execution of Scanning Strategy, and (4) Verification—aims to guide users effectively through the intraoral scanning process, mitigate common clinical challenges, and ensure broad applicability across diverse scanner systems, irrespective of the manufacturer or model.

Related Results

Abstract 1566: Guideline-concordant care among women with HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: A SEER-Medicare analysis
Abstract 1566: Guideline-concordant care among women with HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: A SEER-Medicare analysis
Abstract Objectives: Limited data exist regarding the rates of guideline-concordant care among women with HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The primar...
Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review
Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review
This Campbell systematic review assesses the direct and indirect benefits of public police interventions that use procedurally just dialogue. The review summarises findings from 30...
ABUSE OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL RIGHTS
ABUSE OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL RIGHTS
In the article, the authors reveal a topical issue in the field of civil procedural law, which concerns the abuse of civil procedural rights. Abuse of procedural rights is a signif...
Enhanced scanning control in a confocal scanning laser microscope
Enhanced scanning control in a confocal scanning laser microscope
AbstractA fast and flexible scanning unit, allowing scanning rates of more than 1 kHz over regions identified in a specimen, has been developed and evaluated. This scanning unit re...
Enhanced scanning control in a confocal scanning laser microscope
Enhanced scanning control in a confocal scanning laser microscope
AbstractA fast and flexible scanning unit, allowing scanning rates of more than 1 kHz over regions identified in a specimen, has been developed and evaluated. This scanning unit re...
Periodontal soft tissue augmentation induced by periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics surgery
Periodontal soft tissue augmentation induced by periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics surgery
Abstract Objectives: To quantitatively assess the changes of periodontal soft tissue including gingival thickness and the width of keratinized gingiva after periodontally a...
Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of the dental arch display using modern intraoral three-dimensional scanners
Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of the dental arch display using modern intraoral three-dimensional scanners
BACKGROUND: At present, modern dentists used dental intraoral three-dimensional (3D) scanners routinely in their daily work. Obtaining an optical 3D image of the teeth and dentitio...

Back to Top