Effect of Salt Concentration on Oil Recovery during Polymer Flooding: Simulation Studies on Xanthan Gum and Gum Arabic

Oil recoveries from medium and heavy oil reservoirs under natural recovery production are small because of the high viscosity of the oil. Normal water flooding procedures are usually ineffective, as the injected water bypasses much of the oil because of its high mobility. Thermal flooding processes are desirable but have many disadvantages from costs, effects on the environment, and loss of lighter hydrocarbons. Chemical flooding options, such as bio-polymer flooding options, are attractive, as they are environmentally friendly and relatively cheap to deploy and help to increase the viscosity of the injecting fluid, thereby reducing its mobility and increasing its oil recovery. The downside to polymer flooding includes reservoir temperature, salinity, molecular weight, and composition. Six weight percentages of two polymers (xanthan gum, XG, and gum arabic, GA) are dissolved in water, and their viscosity is measured in the laboratory. These viscosities are incorporated with correlations in the Eclipse software to create models with different polymer concentrations of (0.1% wt., 0.2% wt., 0.3% wt., 0.4% wt., 0.5% wt., and 1% wt.). A base case of natural recovery and water injection was simulated to produce an oil recovery of 5.9% and 30.8%, respectively, while at 0.1% wt. and 1% wt., respectively, oil recoveries of 38.8% and 45.7% (for GA) and 48.1% and 49.8% (for XG) are estimated. At 5% and 10% saline conditions, a drop in oil recovery of (4.6% and 5.3%) is estimated during GA flooding and (1.2% and 1.7%) for XG flooding at 1% wt., respectively. XG exhibits higher oil recoveries compared to GA at the same % wt., while oil recoveries during GA floodings are more negatively affected by higher saline concentrations.