Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Individual differences in face salience and rapid face saccades

View through CrossRef
Humans saccade to faces in their periphery faster than to other types of objects. Previous research has highlighted the potential importance of the upper face region in this, but it is still unclear whether this is driven by the eye region. Similarly, it is still unclear whether such rapid saccades are exclusive to faces or generalize to other semantically salient stimuli. Furthermore, it is unknown whether individuals differ in their face-specific saccadic reaction times and if so, whether such differences could be linked to differences in face fixations during free-viewing. To explore these open questions, we invited 77 participants to perform a saccadic choice task (SCT) in which we contrasted faces as well as other salient objects, particularly isolated face features and text, with cars. Additionally, participants freely viewed 700 images of complex natural scenes in a separate session which allowed us to determine the individual proportion of first fixations falling on faces. For the SCT, we found advantages for all categories of interest over cars. However, this effect was most pronounced for images of full faces. Full faces also elicited faster saccades compared to eyes, showing that isolated eye regions are not sufficient to elicit face-like responses. Additionally, we found consistent individual differences in saccadic reaction times towards faces that weakly correlated with face salience during free-viewing. Our results suggest a link between semantic salience and rapid detection but underscore the unique status of faces. Further research is needed to resolve the mechanisms underlying rapid face saccades.
Title: Individual differences in face salience and rapid face saccades
Description:
Humans saccade to faces in their periphery faster than to other types of objects.
Previous research has highlighted the potential importance of the upper face region in this, but it is still unclear whether this is driven by the eye region.
Similarly, it is still unclear whether such rapid saccades are exclusive to faces or generalize to other semantically salient stimuli.
Furthermore, it is unknown whether individuals differ in their face-specific saccadic reaction times and if so, whether such differences could be linked to differences in face fixations during free-viewing.
To explore these open questions, we invited 77 participants to perform a saccadic choice task (SCT) in which we contrasted faces as well as other salient objects, particularly isolated face features and text, with cars.
Additionally, participants freely viewed 700 images of complex natural scenes in a separate session which allowed us to determine the individual proportion of first fixations falling on faces.
For the SCT, we found advantages for all categories of interest over cars.
However, this effect was most pronounced for images of full faces.
Full faces also elicited faster saccades compared to eyes, showing that isolated eye regions are not sufficient to elicit face-like responses.
Additionally, we found consistent individual differences in saccadic reaction times towards faces that weakly correlated with face salience during free-viewing.
Our results suggest a link between semantic salience and rapid detection but underscore the unique status of faces.
Further research is needed to resolve the mechanisms underlying rapid face saccades.

Related Results

Relationship Between Corrective Saccades and Measures of Physical Function in Unilateral and Bilateral Vestibular Loss
Relationship Between Corrective Saccades and Measures of Physical Function in Unilateral and Bilateral Vestibular Loss
Objectives: Following the loss of vestibular function, some patients functionally improve and are minimally bothered by their loss of peripheral function while others r...
Evidence for a supplementary eye field
Evidence for a supplementary eye field
Electrical microstimulation and unit recording were performed in dorsomedial frontal cortex of four alert monkeys to identify an oculomotor area whose existence had been postulated...
Agreement in Dynamic Map Segmentation: Effects of Framing and Change Salience
Agreement in Dynamic Map Segmentation: Effects of Framing and Change Salience
Event segmentation theory, which explores how individuals divide continuousexperiences into discrete events, has been extensively studied in naturalisticstimuli. We investigate whe...
Saccadic Behavior during the Response to Pure Vergence Stimuli I: General Properties
Saccadic Behavior during the Response to Pure Vergence Stimuli I: General Properties
If two targets are carefully aligned so that they fall along the cyclopean axis, the required eye movement will be symmetrical with the two eyes turning equally inward or outward. ...
Primate Antisaccades. I. Behavioral Characteristics
Primate Antisaccades. I. Behavioral Characteristics
Amador, Nelly, Madeleine Schlag-Rey, and John Schlag. Primate antisaccades. I. Behavioral characteristics. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1775–1786, 1998. The antisaccade task requires a sub...
Express saccades during a countermanding task
Express saccades during a countermanding task
ABSTRACTExpress saccades are unusually short latency, visually guided saccadic eye movements. They are most commonly observed when the fixation spot disappears at a consistent, sho...
Faces in scenes attract rapid saccades
Faces in scenes attract rapid saccades
During natural vision the human visual system has to process upcoming eye movements in parallel to currently fixated stimuli. Saccades targeting isolated faces are known to have lo...
Reward prediction error modulates saccade vigor
Reward prediction error modulates saccade vigor
AbstractMovements toward rewarding stimuli exhibit greater vigor, i.e., increased velocity and reduced reaction-times. This invigoration may be due to release of dopamine before mo...

Back to Top