Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Increasing use of the Impella®-pump in severe cardiogenic shock: a word of caution

View through CrossRef
Abstract Impella® pumps are increasingly utilized in patients in cardiogenic shock. We report on a case series where Impella support was insufficient, and a switch to venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) became necessary. ECMO patients with previous Impella devices were identified utilizing our institutional ECMO database. Since 2014, 10 patients with a mean age of 62 ± 3 years were identified. Despite correct placement of all Impella pumps, cardiogenic shock persisted with progressive multi-organ failure (Impella type 2.5/CP n = 6/4 patients). Femoro-femoral VA ECMO was implanted percutaneously on the contralateral side with the Impella initially left on standby but retracted into the descending aorta for transport reasons after a mean support time of 20 ± 8 h. All patients were able to unload their heart by left ventricular ejection with a blood pressure amplitude of 15 ± 3 mmHg on VA ECMO support. After VA ECMO implantation haemodynamic parameters improved significantly within 24 h of support (mean serum lactate levels decreased from 92 ± 17 to 44 ± 10 mg/dl, P = 0.031). Survival to hospital discharge was 70%. These data indicate that the Impella 2.5® and CP® might not be sufficient in profound cardiogenic shock. Comparative studies are necessary to specify which patient population benefits from which type of circulatory support.
Title: Increasing use of the Impella®-pump in severe cardiogenic shock: a word of caution
Description:
Abstract Impella® pumps are increasingly utilized in patients in cardiogenic shock.
We report on a case series where Impella support was insufficient, and a switch to venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) became necessary.
ECMO patients with previous Impella devices were identified utilizing our institutional ECMO database.
Since 2014, 10 patients with a mean age of 62 ± 3 years were identified.
Despite correct placement of all Impella pumps, cardiogenic shock persisted with progressive multi-organ failure (Impella type 2.
5/CP n = 6/4 patients).
Femoro-femoral VA ECMO was implanted percutaneously on the contralateral side with the Impella initially left on standby but retracted into the descending aorta for transport reasons after a mean support time of 20 ± 8 h.
All patients were able to unload their heart by left ventricular ejection with a blood pressure amplitude of 15 ± 3 mmHg on VA ECMO support.
After VA ECMO implantation haemodynamic parameters improved significantly within 24 h of support (mean serum lactate levels decreased from 92 ± 17 to 44 ± 10 mg/dl, P = 0.
031).
Survival to hospital discharge was 70%.
These data indicate that the Impella 2.
5® and CP® might not be sufficient in profound cardiogenic shock.
Comparative studies are necessary to specify which patient population benefits from which type of circulatory support.

Related Results

Renal Protection and Hemodynamic Improvement by Impella® Microaxial Pump in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
Renal Protection and Hemodynamic Improvement by Impella® Microaxial Pump in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
Acute kidney injury is one of the most frequent and prognostically relevant complications in cardiogenic shock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of th...
Pitfalls due to improper positioning of Impella®CP device for left ventricular support: a case series
Pitfalls due to improper positioning of Impella®CP device for left ventricular support: a case series
Background: The Impella® device is a type of antegrade left ventricular assist device that includes a pump catheter designed to reside in the mid-left ventricular cavity. It has re...
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is part of a clinical syndrome consisting of acute left ventricular failure causing severe hypotension leading to inadequate organ and tissue perfusion. The ...
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is part of a clinical syndrome consisting of acute left ventricular failure causing severe hypotension leading to inadequate organ and tissue perfusion. The ...
Characteristics and outcomes of combination VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock
Characteristics and outcomes of combination VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock
Abstract Background Use of VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock is growing exponentially. The impact of VA-ECMO on in-hospital mortalit...
Cardiogenic shock: role of invasive cardiology
Cardiogenic shock: role of invasive cardiology
Purpose of review Early revascularization significantly improved the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Nevertheles...
What is the evidence for IABP in STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock?
What is the evidence for IABP in STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock?
Intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most widely used left ventricular support device in a variety of indications. This review focuses on the current literature and discusses the...
Refractory Shock. Casuistics
Refractory Shock. Casuistics
Shock Syndrome is an acute progressive circulatory insufficiency where the Heart is unable to circulate the blood in time unit, for supplying with O2 to the cells and to take out f...

Back to Top