Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Predicted Differences and Differences between Predictions

View through CrossRef
When K tests are given to N individuals, and for each individual there are two criterion measures, then (1) the multiple regression weight to be applied to the standard score for each test to predict the criterion-difference score equals the difference of the weights for predicting each criterion separately; (2) the difference between the predicted scores equals the predicted difference (each test being assigned the appropriate multiple regression weight); (3) the square of the multiple correlation between predicted and actual criterion-difference scores equals the sum of squares of the multiple correlations of the battery with each criterion less the product of these correlations and the correlation between predicted scores all divided by twice the quantity one minus the criterion intercorrelation; and (4) the variance of errors of estimating the criterion-difference score equals the sum of the variances of errors of estimating each criterion score minus twice the criterion intercorrelation, plus twice the correlation between predicted scores multiplied by the product of the square root of one minus the variance of errors of estimating one criterion and the corresponding square root for the second criterion.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Predicted Differences and Differences between Predictions
Description:
When K tests are given to N individuals, and for each individual there are two criterion measures, then (1) the multiple regression weight to be applied to the standard score for each test to predict the criterion-difference score equals the difference of the weights for predicting each criterion separately; (2) the difference between the predicted scores equals the predicted difference (each test being assigned the appropriate multiple regression weight); (3) the square of the multiple correlation between predicted and actual criterion-difference scores equals the sum of squares of the multiple correlations of the battery with each criterion less the product of these correlations and the correlation between predicted scores all divided by twice the quantity one minus the criterion intercorrelation; and (4) the variance of errors of estimating the criterion-difference score equals the sum of the variances of errors of estimating each criterion score minus twice the criterion intercorrelation, plus twice the correlation between predicted scores multiplied by the product of the square root of one minus the variance of errors of estimating one criterion and the corresponding square root for the second criterion.

Related Results

Cost of ungrammatical predictions during online sentence processing: evidence against surprisal
Cost of ungrammatical predictions during online sentence processing: evidence against surprisal
The surprisal metric (Hale, 2001; Levy, 2008) successfully predicts syntactic complexity in a large number of online studies (e.g., Demberg and Keller, 2009; Levy and Keller, 2013...
Adaptive reliance on the most stable sensory predictions enhances perceptual feature extraction of moving stimuli
Adaptive reliance on the most stable sensory predictions enhances perceptual feature extraction of moving stimuli
The prediction of the sensory outcomes of action is thought to be useful for distinguishing self- vs. externally generated sensations, correcting movements when sensory feedback is...
Modeling Elk Nutrition and Habitat Use in Western Oregon and Washington
Modeling Elk Nutrition and Habitat Use in Western Oregon and Washington
ABSTRACTStudies of habitat selection and use by wildlife, especially large herbivores, are foundational for understanding their ecology and management, especially if predictors of ...
Decision-making under flood predictions: a risk perception study of coastal real estate
Decision-making under flood predictions: a risk perception study of coastal real estate
Flood models, while representing our best knowledge of a natural phenomenon, are continually evolving. Their predictions, albeit undeniably important for flood risk management, con...
Action enhances predicted touch
Action enhances predicted touch
AbstractIt is widely believed that predicted tactile action outcomes are perceptually attenuated. The present experiments determined whether predictive mechanisms always generate a...
Machine learning insights into HIV outbreak predictions in Sub-Saharan Africa
Machine learning insights into HIV outbreak predictions in Sub-Saharan Africa
Predicting and preventing HIV outbreaks in Sub-Saharan Africa, a region disproportionately affected by the epidemic remains a significant challenge. This review explores the effect...
High-quality probabilistic predictions for existing hydrological models with common objective functions    
High-quality probabilistic predictions for existing hydrological models with common objective functions    
<p>Probabilistic predictions describe the uncertainty in modelled streamflow, which is a critical input for many environmental modelling applications.  A...
Comparison of modeled versus reported phosphate removal and modeled versus postdialysis serum phosphate levels in conventional hemodialysis
Comparison of modeled versus reported phosphate removal and modeled versus postdialysis serum phosphate levels in conventional hemodialysis
AbstractBackgroundWe compared predictions of phosphate removal by a 2‐pool kinetic model with measured phosphate removal in spent dialysate as reported by others.MethodsTwenty‐six ...

Back to Top