Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Unilateral Sanctions in the Context of Modern International Law
View through CrossRef
The author discusses the modern international legal framework governing the application of sanctions. The author focuses on the following issues: international and regional sanctions in the context of the UN Charter, restrictions on sanctions regimes, sanctions in humanitarian law, the legitimacy of unilateral economic sanctions. The methodological base of this work is a systematic approach, which allows to consider sanctions as part of the modern international legal system. As a result of the study, it was revealed that within the framework of the existing international legal system, only the UN Security Council is authorized to impose sanctions in order to ensure global peace and security. The resolutions of the UN Security Council on the issue of the application of restrictive measures are dominant in comparison with the decisions of other international bodies and the obligations of member countries under international treaties. The legitimacy of applying regional sanctions is limited by the statutes of regional organizations. The novelty of the study lies in a comprehensive consideration of the reasons why unilateral sanctions are a violation of international law. Unilateral economic restrictions violate the free trade regime of the WTO and the principle of non-discrimination that underpins the GATT. They represent a violation of the fundamental principles of sovereign equality, as well as the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of other states. As a result of the application of economic sanctions by certain states, extraterritorial jurisdiction is manifested, which creates a dangerous precedent for international law.
Title: Unilateral Sanctions in the Context of Modern International Law
Description:
The author discusses the modern international legal framework governing the application of sanctions.
The author focuses on the following issues: international and regional sanctions in the context of the UN Charter, restrictions on sanctions regimes, sanctions in humanitarian law, the legitimacy of unilateral economic sanctions.
The methodological base of this work is a systematic approach, which allows to consider sanctions as part of the modern international legal system.
As a result of the study, it was revealed that within the framework of the existing international legal system, only the UN Security Council is authorized to impose sanctions in order to ensure global peace and security.
The resolutions of the UN Security Council on the issue of the application of restrictive measures are dominant in comparison with the decisions of other international bodies and the obligations of member countries under international treaties.
The legitimacy of applying regional sanctions is limited by the statutes of regional organizations.
The novelty of the study lies in a comprehensive consideration of the reasons why unilateral sanctions are a violation of international law.
Unilateral economic restrictions violate the free trade regime of the WTO and the principle of non-discrimination that underpins the GATT.
They represent a violation of the fundamental principles of sovereign equality, as well as the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of other states.
As a result of the application of economic sanctions by certain states, extraterritorial jurisdiction is manifested, which creates a dangerous precedent for international law.
Related Results
Researching Modern Economic Sanctions
Researching Modern Economic Sanctions
Economic sanctions are an integral part of states’ foreign policy repertoire. Increasingly, major powers and international organizations rely on sanctions to address an incredibly ...
An International Rule of Law
An International Rule of Law
The “international rule of law” is an elusive concept. Under this heading, mainly two variations are being discussed: The international rule of law “proper” and an “internationaliz...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
Sanctions and Monetary Obligations
Sanctions and Monetary Obligations
Abstract
This chapter focuses on economic sanctions. In general terms, sanctions will usually involve a ‘freeze’ over the assets of the target State, to the extent t...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Maclaine Watson & Co Ltd v. Department of Trade and Industry J H Rayner (Mincing Lane) Ltd v. Department of Trade and Industry and Others, and Related Appeals
Maclaine Watson & Co Ltd v. Department of Trade and Industry J H Rayner (Mincing Lane) Ltd v. Department of Trade and Industry and Others, and Related Appeals
International organizations — Personality — Concept of international legal personality — Whether organization a legal entity distinct from its members — Whether personality of orga...
Economic Sanctions and Food Consumption: Evidence from Iranian Households
Economic Sanctions and Food Consumption: Evidence from Iranian Households
Abstracts
Despite scholarly consensus on the harmful effects of economic sanctions on civilians, there is little micro-level empirical research on how and to what ex...
MEĐUNARODNO JAVNO PRAVO U DIGITALNOJ (SF)ERI: SAJBER SANKCIJE I ODRŽIVI RAZVOJ
MEĐUNARODNO JAVNO PRAVO U DIGITALNOJ (SF)ERI: SAJBER SANKCIJE I ODRŽIVI RAZVOJ
The swift progression of digital technologies has profoundly reshaped global governance, giving rise to new legal issues at the crossroads of international public law, cybersecurit...


