Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning
View through CrossRef
When searching for a shape target, colour distractors typically capture our attention. Capture is smaller when observers search for a fixed target that allows for a feature-specific target template compared to a varying shape singleton target. Capture is also reduced when observers learn to predict the likely distractor location. We investigated how the precision of the target template modulates distractor location learning in an additional singleton search task. As observers are less prone to capture with a feature-specific target, we assumed that distractor location learning is less beneficial and therefore less pronounced than with a mixed-feature target. Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation was used to fit fine-grained distractor location learning curves. A model-based analysis of the time course of distractor location learning revealed an effect on the asymptotic performance level: when searching for a fixed-feature target, the asymptotic distractor cost indicated smaller distractor interference than with a mixed-feature target. Although interference was reduced for distractors at the high-probability location in both tasks, asymptotic distractor suppression was less pronounced with fixed-feature compared to mixed-feature targets. We conclude that with a more precise target template less distractor location learning is required, likely because the distractor dimension is down-weighted and its salience signal reduced.
Title: Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning
Description:
When searching for a shape target, colour distractors typically capture our attention.
Capture is smaller when observers search for a fixed target that allows for a feature-specific target template compared to a varying shape singleton target.
Capture is also reduced when observers learn to predict the likely distractor location.
We investigated how the precision of the target template modulates distractor location learning in an additional singleton search task.
As observers are less prone to capture with a feature-specific target, we assumed that distractor location learning is less beneficial and therefore less pronounced than with a mixed-feature target.
Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation was used to fit fine-grained distractor location learning curves.
A model-based analysis of the time course of distractor location learning revealed an effect on the asymptotic performance level: when searching for a fixed-feature target, the asymptotic distractor cost indicated smaller distractor interference than with a mixed-feature target.
Although interference was reduced for distractors at the high-probability location in both tasks, asymptotic distractor suppression was less pronounced with fixed-feature compared to mixed-feature targets.
We conclude that with a more precise target template less distractor location learning is required, likely because the distractor dimension is down-weighted and its salience signal reduced.
Related Results
Neural Evidence for Feature-based Distractor Inhibition
Neural Evidence for Feature-based Distractor Inhibition
Interference from a salient distractor is typically reduced when the appearance of the distractor follows either spatial or feature-based regularities. While there is a growing bod...
Learned oculomotor avoidance during strong target guidance
Learned oculomotor avoidance during strong target guidance
Visual attention is guided toward behaviorally-relevant objects by target ‘templates’ stored in visual memory. Visual attention also is guided away from nontarget distractors by le...
Representational Competition of Spatially and Temporally Overlapped Target and Distractor
Representational Competition of Spatially and Temporally Overlapped Target and Distractor
Abstract
Representational competition occurs when a task-relevant target stimulus and a distractor overlap in space and time. Given limited neural resources, it is expe...
Rhythmic Sampling and Competition of Target and Distractor in a Motion Detection Task
Rhythmic Sampling and Competition of Target and Distractor in a Motion Detection Task
Abstract
It has been suggested that the visual system samples attended information rhythmically. Does rhythmic sampling also apply to distracting information? How do attended infor...
Rhythmic Sampling and Competition of Target and Distractor in a Motion Detection Task
Rhythmic Sampling and Competition of Target and Distractor in a Motion Detection Task
Abstract
It has been suggested that the visual system samples attended information rhythmically. Does rhythmic sampling also apply to distracting information? How do attended infor...
Rhythmic Sampling and Competition of Target and Distractor in a Motion Detection Task
Rhythmic Sampling and Competition of Target and Distractor in a Motion Detection Task
Abstract
It has been suggested that the visual system samples attended information rhythmically. Does rhythmic sampling also apply to distracting information? How do attended infor...
The Interaction of ADHD-Traits and Trait Anxiety on Inhibitory Control
The Interaction of ADHD-Traits and Trait Anxiety on Inhibitory Control
ADHD and anxiety frequently occur together; however, the cognitive
outcomes of co-morbid anxiety and ADHD are not straightforward. A
potential explanation for conflicting results i...
Effect of Target Detection on Recognition
Effect of Target Detection on Recognition
Abstract
To explore whether the effect of target detection on memory retrieval is associated with confounding factors and the internal cognitive mechanism and determine whe...


