Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Theology Engages With Avicennan Philosophy

View through CrossRef
This chapter discusses two books of refutation written by two Muslim theologians, the Ashʿarite al-Ghazālī (d. 505/1111) and the Muʿtazilite Ibn al-Malāḥimī (d. 536/1141). Both books aim at refuting teachings of the Muslimfalāsifa, here understood as the Aristotelian tradition in Islam, represented by al-Farābī (d. 339/950–1) and Ibn Sīnā (d. 428/1037). While Ibn al-Malāḥimī in hisTuḥfat al-mutakallimīnaims at a straightforward rejection of most of the teachings of this group and includes arguments in favour of Muʿtazilite positions, al-Ghazālī’s strategy is more complex. In hisTahāfut al-falāsifahe aims to invalidate thefalāsifa’s claim of having demonstrated their teachings in metaphysics. Showing that these teachings are not supported by valid demonstrations allows al-Ghazālī to refute them wherever he thinks they violate revelation and adopt them, on basis of the authority of revelation, wherever he thinks they are true.
Oxford University Press
Title: Theology Engages With Avicennan Philosophy
Description:
This chapter discusses two books of refutation written by two Muslim theologians, the Ashʿarite al-Ghazālī (d.
505/1111) and the Muʿtazilite Ibn al-Malāḥimī (d.
536/1141).
Both books aim at refuting teachings of the Muslimfalāsifa, here understood as the Aristotelian tradition in Islam, represented by al-Farābī (d.
339/950–1) and Ibn Sīnā (d.
428/1037).
While Ibn al-Malāḥimī in hisTuḥfat al-mutakallimīnaims at a straightforward rejection of most of the teachings of this group and includes arguments in favour of Muʿtazilite positions, al-Ghazālī’s strategy is more complex.
In hisTahāfut al-falāsifahe aims to invalidate thefalāsifa’s claim of having demonstrated their teachings in metaphysics.
Showing that these teachings are not supported by valid demonstrations allows al-Ghazālī to refute them wherever he thinks they violate revelation and adopt them, on basis of the authority of revelation, wherever he thinks they are true.

Related Results

God in Islamic Theology
God in Islamic Theology
Theology is a rational endeavor to understand everything about God, from within a faith tradition and its scriptures, and in response to problems posed by the conditions of a parti...
Nordic Christianity in Dialogue
Nordic Christianity in Dialogue
This edited collection affirms the joy of engaging theologically in interdisciplinary dialogue from a Nordic perspective. In tribute to Danish Professor of System...
The Bloomsbury Guide to Philosophy of Disability
The Bloomsbury Guide to Philosophy of Disability
The Bloomsbury Guide to Philosophy of Disability is a revolutionary collection encompassing the most innovative and insurgent work in philosophy of disability. Edited and anthologi...
Being and Nothing
Being and Nothing
In this masterful work, leading German philosopher Lorenz B. Puntel answers the primordial question of philosophy: "Why is there Being at all and not absolutely nothing?" ...
John Webster and Prayer
John Webster and Prayer
Mason carefully develops a theology of prayer that builds on the dogmatic and moral theology of one of the most significant Reformed theologians of the past 50 years: John Webster....
Continental Philosophy
Continental Philosophy
This chapter attempts to outline possible contributions that continental philosophy can make to the epistemology of theology. It begins with an extended engagement with Nicholas Wo...
Bernard Williams on Philosophy and History
Bernard Williams on Philosophy and History
Abstract For Bernard Williams, philosophy and history are importantly connected. His work exploits this connection in a number of directions: he believes that philos...
Theology and Spider-Man
Theology and Spider-Man
Theology and Spider-Man provides a look at the religious themes present in one of the most popular heroes of the past half-century, Spider-Man. In order to create a systematic theo...

Back to Top