Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cell type directed design of synthetic enhancers
View through CrossRef
Transcriptional enhancers act as docking stations for combinations of transcription factors and thereby regulate spatiotemporal activation of their target genes. A single enhancer, of a few hundred base pairs in length, can autonomously and independently of its location and orientation drive cell-type specific expression of a gene or transgene. It has been a long-standing goal in the field to decode the regulatory logic of an enhancer and to understand the details of how spatiotemporal gene expression is encoded in an enhancer sequence. Recently, deep learning models have yielded unprecedented insight into the enhancer code, and well-trained models are reaching a level of understanding that may be close to complete. As a consequence, we hypothesized that deep learning models can be used to guide the directed design of synthetic, cell type specific enhancers, and that this process would allow for a detailed tracing of all enhancer features at nucleotide-level resolution. Here we implemented and compared three different design strategies, each built on a deep learning model: (1) directed sequence evolution; (2) directed iterative motif implanting; and (3) generative design. We evaluated the function of fully synthetic enhancers to specifically target Kenyon cells in the fruit fly brain using transgenic animals. We then exploited this concept further by creating “dual-code” enhancers that target two cell types, and minimal enhancers smaller than 50 base pairs that are fully functional. By examining the trajectories followed during state space searches towards functional enhancers, we could accurately define the enhancer code as the optimal strength, combination, and relative distance of TF activator motifs, and the absence of TF repressor motifs. Finally, we applied the same three strategies to successfully design human enhancers. In conclusion, enhancer design guided by deep learning leads to better understanding of how enhancers work and shows that their code can be exploited to manipulate cell states.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Title: Cell type directed design of synthetic enhancers
Description:
Transcriptional enhancers act as docking stations for combinations of transcription factors and thereby regulate spatiotemporal activation of their target genes.
A single enhancer, of a few hundred base pairs in length, can autonomously and independently of its location and orientation drive cell-type specific expression of a gene or transgene.
It has been a long-standing goal in the field to decode the regulatory logic of an enhancer and to understand the details of how spatiotemporal gene expression is encoded in an enhancer sequence.
Recently, deep learning models have yielded unprecedented insight into the enhancer code, and well-trained models are reaching a level of understanding that may be close to complete.
As a consequence, we hypothesized that deep learning models can be used to guide the directed design of synthetic, cell type specific enhancers, and that this process would allow for a detailed tracing of all enhancer features at nucleotide-level resolution.
Here we implemented and compared three different design strategies, each built on a deep learning model: (1) directed sequence evolution; (2) directed iterative motif implanting; and (3) generative design.
We evaluated the function of fully synthetic enhancers to specifically target Kenyon cells in the fruit fly brain using transgenic animals.
We then exploited this concept further by creating “dual-code” enhancers that target two cell types, and minimal enhancers smaller than 50 base pairs that are fully functional.
By examining the trajectories followed during state space searches towards functional enhancers, we could accurately define the enhancer code as the optimal strength, combination, and relative distance of TF activator motifs, and the absence of TF repressor motifs.
Finally, we applied the same three strategies to successfully design human enhancers.
In conclusion, enhancer design guided by deep learning leads to better understanding of how enhancers work and shows that their code can be exploited to manipulate cell states.
Related Results
Epigenetic Remodeling in Human Coronary Artery Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotypic Switching
Epigenetic Remodeling in Human Coronary Artery Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotypic Switching
AbstractBackgroundSmooth muscle cell (SMC) dedifferentiation contributes to repair and remodeling, but also cardiovascular pathologies. To understand this plasticity, the epigeneti...
Connectome and regulatory hubs of CAGE highly active enhancers
Connectome and regulatory hubs of CAGE highly active enhancers
AbstractEvidence indicates that enhancers are transcriptionally active. Herein, we investigated transcriptionally active enhancers by using cap analysis of gene expression (CAGE) c...
MARS-seq2.0: an experimental and analytical pipeline for indexed sorting combined with single-cell RNA sequencing v1
MARS-seq2.0: an experimental and analytical pipeline for indexed sorting combined with single-cell RNA sequencing v1
Human tissues comprise trillions of cells that populate a complex space of molecular phenotypes and functions and that vary in abundance by 4–9 orders of magnitude. Relying solely ...
How enhancers regulate wavelike gene expression patterns
How enhancers regulate wavelike gene expression patterns
A key problem in development is to understand how genes turn on or off at the right place and right time during embryogenesis. Such decisions are made by non-coding sequences calle...
Abstract 1695: Genomic clustering tendency of transcription factors reflects phase-separated transcriptional condensates at cancer super-enhancers
Abstract 1695: Genomic clustering tendency of transcription factors reflects phase-separated transcriptional condensates at cancer super-enhancers
Abstract
Many transcription factors (TFs) have been shown to bind to super-enhancers, forming transcriptional condensates to activate transcription in various cellul...
Abstract 1708: Transposable element derived enhancers in ovarian cancer
Abstract 1708: Transposable element derived enhancers in ovarian cancer
Abstract
There is global epigenetic dysregulation during transformation from normal to cancerous cells. One of the many consequences of this global epigenetic dysreg...
Identification of key tissue-specific, biological processes by integrating enhancer information in maize gene regulatory networks
Identification of key tissue-specific, biological processes by integrating enhancer information in maize gene regulatory networks
AbstractEnhancers are important regulators of gene expression during numerous crucial processes including tissue differentiation across development. In plants, their recent molecul...

