Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia

View through CrossRef
Background and Objectives Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration of intrathecal neostigmine and clonidine has been reported to produce no neurotoxicity in sheep. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combining intrathecal neostigmine and clonidine for the relief of pain in patients after cesarean delivery. Methods After giving their consents, 80 parturients who were scheduled for cesarean delivery during spinal anesthesia were enrolled by a double-blind randomized design into four groups: bupivacaine group (n = 20) received intrathecal (IT) 10 mg bupivacaine; bupivacaine + neostigmine group (n = 19) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 50 μg neostigmine; bupivacaine + clonidine group (n = 20) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 150 μg clonidine; and bupivacaine + both (n = 21) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 50 μg neostigmine + 150 μg clonidine. The maximum spread of anesthesia, duration of analgesia and motor block, vital signs, and incidence of adverse effects were recorded for 14 hours postinjection. Fifty milligrams intramuscular meperidine was given as a rescue analgesic whenever patient's pain score was greater than 5/10 by the visual analog scale. Results The demographic data were similar for all four groups. Bupivacaine + both group had a significantly higher maximum spread of anesthesia of 23.3 ± 2.9 segments than bupivacaine group of 20.5 ± 2.9 segment. Bupivacaine + both group showed a later onset of postsurgical pain of 6.5 ± 1.5 hours as compared to bupivacaine group of 1.3 ± 0.6 hours. The pain score in bupivacaine + both group was significantly lower than that of bupivacaine group during the first 10 hours. The 24-hour meperidine consumption also was lower in bupivacaine + both group than that of bupivacaine group. However, motor block was significantly prolonged from 3.5 ± 1.1 hours in bupivacaine group to 7.1 ± 1.6 hours in bupivacaine + both group. In addition, other side effects such as nausea and vomiting and dizziness were significantly increased in bupivacaine + both group. Conclusion Our study showed that the combination of 150 μg IT clonidine and 50 μg neostigmine provided longer postsurgical analgesia than with either drug used alone. However, this combination also produced significantly more adverse effects of prolonged motor block and nausea and vomiting. A further study combining the two study drugs but using a lower dose of IT neostigmine (e.g., 25 μg) is recommended.
Title: Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Description:
Background and Objectives Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans.
The concurrent administration of intrathecal neostigmine and clonidine has been reported to produce no neurotoxicity in sheep.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combining intrathecal neostigmine and clonidine for the relief of pain in patients after cesarean delivery.
Methods After giving their consents, 80 parturients who were scheduled for cesarean delivery during spinal anesthesia were enrolled by a double-blind randomized design into four groups: bupivacaine group (n = 20) received intrathecal (IT) 10 mg bupivacaine; bupivacaine + neostigmine group (n = 19) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 50 μg neostigmine; bupivacaine + clonidine group (n = 20) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 150 μg clonidine; and bupivacaine + both (n = 21) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 50 μg neostigmine + 150 μg clonidine.
The maximum spread of anesthesia, duration of analgesia and motor block, vital signs, and incidence of adverse effects were recorded for 14 hours postinjection.
Fifty milligrams intramuscular meperidine was given as a rescue analgesic whenever patient's pain score was greater than 5/10 by the visual analog scale.
Results The demographic data were similar for all four groups.
Bupivacaine + both group had a significantly higher maximum spread of anesthesia of 23.
3 ± 2.
9 segments than bupivacaine group of 20.
5 ± 2.
9 segment.
Bupivacaine + both group showed a later onset of postsurgical pain of 6.
5 ± 1.
5 hours as compared to bupivacaine group of 1.
3 ± 0.
6 hours.
The pain score in bupivacaine + both group was significantly lower than that of bupivacaine group during the first 10 hours.
The 24-hour meperidine consumption also was lower in bupivacaine + both group than that of bupivacaine group.
However, motor block was significantly prolonged from 3.
5 ± 1.
1 hours in bupivacaine group to 7.
1 ± 1.
6 hours in bupivacaine + both group.
In addition, other side effects such as nausea and vomiting and dizziness were significantly increased in bupivacaine + both group.
Conclusion Our study showed that the combination of 150 μg IT clonidine and 50 μg neostigmine provided longer postsurgical analgesia than with either drug used alone.
However, this combination also produced significantly more adverse effects of prolonged motor block and nausea and vomiting.
A further study combining the two study drugs but using a lower dose of IT neostigmine (e.
g.
, 25 μg) is recommended.

Related Results

A Multi-center Study of Intrathecal Neostigmine for Analgesia following Vaginal Hysterectomy 
A Multi-center Study of Intrathecal Neostigmine for Analgesia following Vaginal Hysterectomy 
Background Intrathecal neostigmine injection produces analgesia in volunteers and reduces hypotension from intrathecal bupivacaine in animals. Initial clinical trials w...
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most popular regional anesthesia technique for lower limb and lower abdominal surgery. Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy is commonly used for intrathecal ...
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most popular regional anesthesia technique for lower limb and lower abdominal surgery. Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy is commonly used for intrathecal ...
Intravenous Regional Anesthesia Using Lidocaine and Clonidine 
Intravenous Regional Anesthesia Using Lidocaine and Clonidine 
Background Clonidine has been added to local anesthetic regimens for various peripheral nerve blocks, resulting in prolonged anesthesia and analgesia. The authors postu...
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED]Rhino XL Reviews, NY USA: Studies show that testosterone levels in males decrease constantly with growing age. There are also many other problems that males face due ...
Postoperative skeletal pain
Postoperative skeletal pain
This thesis attempts to better understand postoperative skeletal pain, quantify its severity and provide directions for its improved treatment. Chapter 2 described the current cl...

Back to Top