Javascript must be enabled to continue!
TO STUDY THE CLINICAL PROFILE AND OUTCOME OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEED - A TERTIARY CARE EXPERIENCE
View through CrossRef
Background:Acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding is one of the common medical emergencies that have a hospital mortality of approximately 7% to 10%. Acute upper GI bleed is divided into variceal and non-variceal causes. Acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding remains one of the most common challenges faced by Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists in their day to day clinical practice. Objectives:To study the clinical profile and outcomeof upper gastrointestinal bleed. Methodology: All patients underwent thorough history taking and meticulous physical examination (general physical and systemic examination) withcareful hemodynamic assessment of pulse and blood pressure includingorthostatic changes and urine output. Patients were first hemodynamicallystabilised (fluids, inotropic support, blood transfusion was given wherever required). Laboratory investigations such as CBC, liver/ kidney function tests, PT/INR, chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, urine microscopy, and ultrasonography of abdomen were done in all patients. Results: 25% (n=90) patients had varicealhaemorrhage and 75% (n=290) had non-varicealhaemorrhage as the cause of Upper GI bleed. NSAIDs were the mostfrequently taken medication (16.6%, n=60).the commonest clinical presentation was hematemesis and melena (43%, n= 154) cases. The prevalence of other presentations wasmelena (34.4%, n=124), hematemesis (17.2%, n=62) and hematochezia (5.6%, n=20). Hematemesis with malena (82.2%, n=80) was the predominant presentationamong patients with variceal bleed. Malena was present in 17.8% (n=16) ofpatients with variceal bleed. None presented as haematochezia or hematemesis alone. The main presentation of non-variceal bleeding was melena (40%, n=108). Other presentation were hematemesis with melena (29.6%, n=80),hematemesis (22.9%, n=62) and hematochezia (7.5%, n=20). Conclusion: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common acute medical emergency. The Rockall score is an effective tool for outcome prediction in patients with acute upper GI bleeding.
International Journal Of Advanced Research
Title: TO STUDY THE CLINICAL PROFILE AND OUTCOME OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEED - A TERTIARY CARE EXPERIENCE
Description:
Background:Acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding is one of the common medical emergencies that have a hospital mortality of approximately 7% to 10%.
Acute upper GI bleed is divided into variceal and non-variceal causes.
Acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding remains one of the most common challenges faced by Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists in their day to day clinical practice.
Objectives:To study the clinical profile and outcomeof upper gastrointestinal bleed.
Methodology: All patients underwent thorough history taking and meticulous physical examination (general physical and systemic examination) withcareful hemodynamic assessment of pulse and blood pressure includingorthostatic changes and urine output.
Patients were first hemodynamicallystabilised (fluids, inotropic support, blood transfusion was given wherever required).
Laboratory investigations such as CBC, liver/ kidney function tests, PT/INR, chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, urine microscopy, and ultrasonography of abdomen were done in all patients.
Results: 25% (n=90) patients had varicealhaemorrhage and 75% (n=290) had non-varicealhaemorrhage as the cause of Upper GI bleed.
NSAIDs were the mostfrequently taken medication (16.
6%, n=60).
the commonest clinical presentation was hematemesis and melena (43%, n= 154) cases.
The prevalence of other presentations wasmelena (34.
4%, n=124), hematemesis (17.
2%, n=62) and hematochezia (5.
6%, n=20).
Hematemesis with malena (82.
2%, n=80) was the predominant presentationamong patients with variceal bleed.
Malena was present in 17.
8% (n=16) ofpatients with variceal bleed.
None presented as haematochezia or hematemesis alone.
The main presentation of non-variceal bleeding was melena (40%, n=108).
Other presentation were hematemesis with melena (29.
6%, n=80),hematemesis (22.
9%, n=62) and hematochezia (7.
5%, n=20).
Conclusion: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common acute medical emergency.
The Rockall score is an effective tool for outcome prediction in patients with acute upper GI bleeding.
Related Results
Loss in Axial Compressor Bleed Systems
Loss in Axial Compressor Bleed Systems
Abstract
Loss in axial compressor bleed systems is quantified, and the loss mechanisms identified, in order to determine how efficiency can be improved. For a given ...
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
The increasing aging of our society is putting increasing pressure on the current organization of care and support. This moved the Flemish government to a thorough reform of primar...
A study of the risk factors and outcome in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed presenting to a tertiary care center in Kumaon region of Uttarakhand
A study of the risk factors and outcome in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed presenting to a tertiary care center in Kumaon region of Uttarakhand
Background: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding refers to blood loss within the intraluminal GI tract from any location between the upper esophagi to the duodenum at the level of ...
A study of the risk factors and outcome in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed presenting to a tertiary care center in Kumaon region of Uttarakhand
A study of the risk factors and outcome in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed presenting to a tertiary care center in Kumaon region of Uttarakhand
Background: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding refers to blood loss within the intraluminal GI tract from any location between the upper esophagi to the duodenum at the level of ...
Frequency of Different Etiologies in Patients of Upper GI Bleed
Frequency of Different Etiologies in Patients of Upper GI Bleed
Objectives: To find out the frequency of different etiologies of upper GI bleed, based on endoscopic findings.
Methodology: It was a retrospective study done over a period of 6 mo...
GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING, DESCRIPTION, ETIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, CLASSIFICATION, CLINICAL PRESENTATION, TREATMENT AND PROGNOSIS
GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING, DESCRIPTION, ETIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, CLASSIFICATION, CLINICAL PRESENTATION, TREATMENT AND PROGNOSIS
Introduction: Gastrointestinal bleeding can be divided into 2 broad categories: upper and lower bleeding. The anatomical landmark that divides upper and lower bleeds is the ligamen...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Clinicoetiological profile of patients with gastrointestinal bleed presenting to a tertiary care hospital in Kumaon Region of Uttarakhand
Clinicoetiological profile of patients with gastrointestinal bleed presenting to a tertiary care hospital in Kumaon Region of Uttarakhand
Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleed is a common cause of medical emergency resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. GI bleeding can be classified as upper (bleeding so...

