Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Carbapenem resistance gene crisis in A. baumannii: A computational analysis

View through CrossRef
AbstractAcinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii)is one of the members ofESKAPEbacteria which is considered multidrug resistant globally. The objective of this study is to determine the protein docking of different ARGs inA. baumannii.In silicoanalysis of antibiotic resistance genes against carbapenem are the blaOXA-51, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-58, blaOXA-24, blaOXA-143, NMD-1 and IMP-1 inA. baumannii. The doripenem, imipenem and meropenem were docked to blaOXA-51 and blaOXA-23 using PyRx. The top docking energy was − 5.5 Kcal/mol by imipenem and doripenem and meropenem showed a binding score of -5. 2Kcal/mol each and blaOXA-23 energy was − 4.3 Kcal/mol by imipenem and meropenem showed a binding score of -2.3 Kcal/mol, while doripenem showed the binding score of -3.4 Kcal/mol. Similarly, doripenem imipenem and meropenem were docked to blaOXA-58, IMP-1, Rec A and blaOXA-143, with docking energy was − 8.8Kcal/mol by doripenem and meropenem each while imipenem showed a binding score of -4.2Kcal/mol and with IMP-1 demonstrated their binding energies. was − 5.7 Kcal/mol by meropenem and doripenem showed a binding score of -5.3Kcal/mol, while imipenem showed a binding score of -4.5 Kcal/mol. And docking energy was − 4.9Kcal/mol by imipenem and meropenem showed binding energy of -3.6Kcal/mol each while doripenem showed a binding score of -3.9Kcal/mol in RecA and with blaOXA-143 docking energy was − 3.0 Kcal/mol by imipenem and meropenem showed a binding score of -1.9Kcal/mol, while doripenem showed the binding score of -2.5 Kcal/mol respectively. Doripenem, imipenem, and meropenem docking findings with blaOXA-24 confirmed their binding energies. Doripenem had the highest docking energy of -5.5 Kcal/mol, meropenem had a binding score of -4.0 Kcal/mol, and imipenem had a binding score of -3.9 Kcal/mol. PyRx was used to dock the doripenem, imipenem, and meropenem to NMD-1. Docking energies for doripenem were all – 4.0Kcal/mol, whereas meropenem had docking energy of -3.3 Kcal/mol and imipenem was − 1.50Kcal/mol.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Carbapenem resistance gene crisis in A. baumannii: A computational analysis
Description:
AbstractAcinetobacter baumannii (A.
baumannii)is one of the members ofESKAPEbacteria which is considered multidrug resistant globally.
The objective of this study is to determine the protein docking of different ARGs inA.
baumannii.
In silicoanalysis of antibiotic resistance genes against carbapenem are the blaOXA-51, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-58, blaOXA-24, blaOXA-143, NMD-1 and IMP-1 inA.
baumannii.
The doripenem, imipenem and meropenem were docked to blaOXA-51 and blaOXA-23 using PyRx.
The top docking energy was − 5.
5 Kcal/mol by imipenem and doripenem and meropenem showed a binding score of -5.
2Kcal/mol each and blaOXA-23 energy was − 4.
3 Kcal/mol by imipenem and meropenem showed a binding score of -2.
3 Kcal/mol, while doripenem showed the binding score of -3.
4 Kcal/mol.
Similarly, doripenem imipenem and meropenem were docked to blaOXA-58, IMP-1, Rec A and blaOXA-143, with docking energy was − 8.
8Kcal/mol by doripenem and meropenem each while imipenem showed a binding score of -4.
2Kcal/mol and with IMP-1 demonstrated their binding energies.
was − 5.
7 Kcal/mol by meropenem and doripenem showed a binding score of -5.
3Kcal/mol, while imipenem showed a binding score of -4.
5 Kcal/mol.
And docking energy was − 4.
9Kcal/mol by imipenem and meropenem showed binding energy of -3.
6Kcal/mol each while doripenem showed a binding score of -3.
9Kcal/mol in RecA and with blaOXA-143 docking energy was − 3.
0 Kcal/mol by imipenem and meropenem showed a binding score of -1.
9Kcal/mol, while doripenem showed the binding score of -2.
5 Kcal/mol respectively.
Doripenem, imipenem, and meropenem docking findings with blaOXA-24 confirmed their binding energies.
Doripenem had the highest docking energy of -5.
5 Kcal/mol, meropenem had a binding score of -4.
0 Kcal/mol, and imipenem had a binding score of -3.
9 Kcal/mol.
PyRx was used to dock the doripenem, imipenem, and meropenem to NMD-1.
Docking energies for doripenem were all – 4.
0Kcal/mol, whereas meropenem had docking energy of -3.
3 Kcal/mol and imipenem was − 1.
50Kcal/mol.

Related Results

Prevalence and mechanism of carbapenem-resistant genes in Acinetobacter baumannii
Prevalence and mechanism of carbapenem-resistant genes in Acinetobacter baumannii
Abstract BackgroundGram-negative Acinetobacter baumannii is an opportunistic pathogen, being highly reported for causing various nosocomial infections worldwide. The presen...
Prevalensi Gen OXA-23 pada Isolat Klinis Bakter Acinetobacter baumanii di RSUP Dr. M. Djamil Padang
Prevalensi Gen OXA-23 pada Isolat Klinis Bakter Acinetobacter baumanii di RSUP Dr. M. Djamil Padang
Acinetobacter baumannii is such a big challenge in this modern era because of their multi-drug resistance (MDR) through their resistance mechanism, namely the production of beta la...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Discernment of Acinetobacter Species in World Scenario
Discernment of Acinetobacter Species in World Scenario
The morphology of Acinetobacter species is Gram-negative, nonmotile, nonfermenting, Strictly aerobic, Oxidase negative, and Catalase positive. It usually results from an infectious...

Back to Top