Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Facilitation of laryngeal mask airway insertion Effects of remifentanil administered before induction with target‐controlled propofol infusion

View through CrossRef
Eighty‐six adult day‐case patients were recruited into a prospective, randomised study and allocated to one of two groups. Patients received either intravenous remifentanil 0.3 µg.kg−1 or an equivalent volume of sodium chloride 0.9% followed by induction of anaesthesia with propofol target‐controlled infusion until the effect (brain) site calculated concentration was 2 µg.ml−1. Jaw opening and ease of laryngeal mask insertion were assessed immediately after mask insertion. A higher incidence of failure of induction of anaesthesia was observed in the control group compared with the remifentanil group [15 (35%) vs. 3 (7%); p < 0.01] and addition of remifentanil significantly increased the ease and success of laryngeal mask insertion, with grade 1 (no coughing/gagging) conditions observed in 29 (68%) of the remifentanil group and 21 (49%) of the control group (p < 0.01).The doses of remifentanil and propofol used were not associated with any significant cardiorespiratory instability. In conclusion, when combined with propofol target‐controlled infusion, remifentanil 0.3 µg.kg−1 facilitates laryngeal mask insertion with minimal adverse haemodynamic changes.
Title: Facilitation of laryngeal mask airway insertion Effects of remifentanil administered before induction with target‐controlled propofol infusion
Description:
Eighty‐six adult day‐case patients were recruited into a prospective, randomised study and allocated to one of two groups.
Patients received either intravenous remifentanil 0.
3 µg.
kg−1 or an equivalent volume of sodium chloride 0.
9% followed by induction of anaesthesia with propofol target‐controlled infusion until the effect (brain) site calculated concentration was 2 µg.
ml−1.
Jaw opening and ease of laryngeal mask insertion were assessed immediately after mask insertion.
A higher incidence of failure of induction of anaesthesia was observed in the control group compared with the remifentanil group [15 (35%) vs.
3 (7%); p < 0.
01] and addition of remifentanil significantly increased the ease and success of laryngeal mask insertion, with grade 1 (no coughing/gagging) conditions observed in 29 (68%) of the remifentanil group and 21 (49%) of the control group (p < 0.
01).
The doses of remifentanil and propofol used were not associated with any significant cardiorespiratory instability.
In conclusion, when combined with propofol target‐controlled infusion, remifentanil 0.
3 µg.
kg−1 facilitates laryngeal mask insertion with minimal adverse haemodynamic changes.

Related Results

Comparison of Propofol and Sevoflurane for Insertion of LMA in Children
Comparison of Propofol and Sevoflurane for Insertion of LMA in Children
Propofol is a drug of choice for induction of laryngeal mask airway insertion due to its ability to depress oropharyngeal and cough reflexes. Sevoflurane is a no pungent inhalation...
SIRT2 overexpression alleviates remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia through microglia
SIRT2 overexpression alleviates remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia through microglia
Abstract Background: Sirtuin 2 (SIRT2), a member of the mammalian sirtuin family, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of various neurological diseases. However, whe...
Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Propofol in a Medium-Chain Triglyceride Emulsion
Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Propofol in a Medium-Chain Triglyceride Emulsion
Background Because propofol is water insoluble, current formulations of propofol use a soybean oil emulsion. These soybean emulsions cause elevated plasma triglycerides...

Back to Top