Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Household Livelihood Strategies and Implication for Poverty Reduction in Rural Areas of Central Nepal
View through CrossRef
Understanding household livelihood strategies is pivotal to minimize rural poverty in the least developed countries like Nepal. This study is an attempt to assess livelihood strategies pursued by rural households, investigate the most remunerative strategy, and identify the factors that influence a household’s choice of better strategies in rural Nepal. Primary data collected in 453 households from three villages of central Nepal are analyzed quantitatively within a sustainable livelihood framework. This study categorized households into five main livelihood strategy groups. The results showed that the majority (61%) of the households diversified their income to non-farm sources. Livelihood diversification to business/enterprise strategies adopted by 16% of the households is the most remunerative strategy followed by commercial farming that includes 13% of the sample and are more relevant to poverty reduction. Land holding, education, agriculture and skill training, access to credit, and proximity to the road and market center are the major influencing factors on the adoption of higher returning livelihood strategies. Stimulating poor households to follow market-oriented farm and non-farm activities by improving access to education, vocational training, rural credit, and rural infrastructures is momentous for reducing poverty in the rural areas of central Nepal.
Title: Household Livelihood Strategies and Implication for Poverty Reduction in Rural Areas of Central Nepal
Description:
Understanding household livelihood strategies is pivotal to minimize rural poverty in the least developed countries like Nepal.
This study is an attempt to assess livelihood strategies pursued by rural households, investigate the most remunerative strategy, and identify the factors that influence a household’s choice of better strategies in rural Nepal.
Primary data collected in 453 households from three villages of central Nepal are analyzed quantitatively within a sustainable livelihood framework.
This study categorized households into five main livelihood strategy groups.
The results showed that the majority (61%) of the households diversified their income to non-farm sources.
Livelihood diversification to business/enterprise strategies adopted by 16% of the households is the most remunerative strategy followed by commercial farming that includes 13% of the sample and are more relevant to poverty reduction.
Land holding, education, agriculture and skill training, access to credit, and proximity to the road and market center are the major influencing factors on the adoption of higher returning livelihood strategies.
Stimulating poor households to follow market-oriented farm and non-farm activities by improving access to education, vocational training, rural credit, and rural infrastructures is momentous for reducing poverty in the rural areas of central Nepal.
Related Results
Difference of Farmers’ Livelihood Capital before and after Rural Tourism Development
Difference of Farmers’ Livelihood Capital before and after Rural Tourism Development
Purpose. To compare the differences in rural household livelihood capital before and after the development of rural tourism to derive factors that affect rural household livelihood...
POVERTY PERSPECTIVES AND REDUCTION STRATEGIES IN INDONESIA
POVERTY PERSPECTIVES AND REDUCTION STRATEGIES IN INDONESIA
The purpose of this study is to identify the poverty perspective and poverty alleviation strategies in Indonesia. Poverty is one of the problems still facing Indonesia. Given that ...
Household Livelihood Strategies and Food Security in Angolela Tera District, Ethiopia
Household Livelihood Strategies and Food Security in Angolela Tera District, Ethiopia
Worrying about reduction of food insecurity directly or indirectly linked with the livelihood strategy. Food security of the household is a reply of available livelihood strategies...
The Study on Poverty Reduction Effects of Chinese Urban Minimum Living Standard Guarantee System—Empirical Analysis Based on CHIP 2002 and 2007
The Study on Poverty Reduction Effects of Chinese Urban Minimum Living Standard Guarantee System—Empirical Analysis Based on CHIP 2002 and 2007
The Chinese urban minimum living-standard guarantee system, mainly functions to guarantee the poor people to have minimum living-standard life; at same time it can make some people...
Exploring Drivers of Livelihood Diversification and Its Effect on Adoption of Sustainable Land Management Practices in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia
Exploring Drivers of Livelihood Diversification and Its Effect on Adoption of Sustainable Land Management Practices in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia
Land degradation poses a major threat to agricultural production and food security in Ethiopia, and sustainable land management (SLM) is key in dealing with its adverse impacts. Th...
Review of the Evidence: The Interface between Poverty, Livelihoods, Institutions, and Community Development
Review of the Evidence: The Interface between Poverty, Livelihoods, Institutions, and Community Development
This paper seeks to critically review the existing literature on the links or interfaces between poverty, livelihoods, institutions, and community development. This discussion give...
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness, efficiency and implementation of cash transfers in humanitarian settings. The review summarises evidence from five studi...
Evaluation of Poverty Reduction Programs in Batam City
Evaluation of Poverty Reduction Programs in Batam City
Poverty is still a severe problem in Indonesia. Statistics show that until the end of 2017, the number of poor people in Indonesia is 26.58 million people or 10.12 percent of the t...

