Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The performance of ChatGPT in day surgery and pre-anesthesia risk assessment: a case-control study across on 150 simulated patient presentations
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Day surgery has developed rapidly in China in recent years, although it still faces the shortage of anesthesiologists to handle pre-anesthesia routine for day surgery. We hypothesized that Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) may assist anesthesiologists in preoperative assessment and answer questions on the patients' concerns. The aim of this study was to examine the ability of ChatGPT in pre-operative risk assessment and its accuracy to answer questions regarding knowledge and management for day surgery anesthesia.
Methods
150 patient profiles were generated to simulate day surgery patient presentations, with complications of varying acuity and severity. Both ChatGPT group and expert group has to evaluate 150 patients for their ASA classification and whether day surgery was recommended. Then ChatGPT was asked to answer 145 questions about day surgery anesthesia that represented the most common issues encountered in clinical practice. The performance of ChatGPT was assessed and graded independently by two experienced anesthesiologists.
Results
A total of 150 patients for assessment were included in the study (74 males [49.5%] and 76 females [50.7%]). There was no difference between ChatGPT group and the expert group for ASA classification and assessment of anesthesia risk in the patients (P > 0.05). When comes to day surgery recommendation, for patients with certain comorbidities (ASA ≥ II), the expert group was inclined to need further examination or treatment, the proportion of conclusions made by ChatGPT was smaller (ChatGPT n (%) vs. expert n (%): day surgery can be performed, 67 (47.9) vs. 31(25.4); need further treatment and evaluation, 56 (37.3) vs. 66 (44.0); day surgery is not recommended, 18 (12.9) vs. 29 (9.3), P < 0.05). We showed that ChatGPT had extensive knowledge related to day surgery anesthesia (94.0% correct), with most of the points (70%) considered comprehensive. The performance was better in the domains of peri-anesthesia concerns, lifestyle, and emotional support.
Conclusions
ChatGPT has certain reference value for ASA classification and assessment of anesthesia risk in patients. ChatGPT can also be trusted to answer questions and concerns related to pre-anesthesia and therefore has the potential to provide important assistance in clinical work.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: The performance of ChatGPT in day surgery and pre-anesthesia risk assessment: a case-control study across on 150 simulated patient presentations
Description:
Abstract
Background
Day surgery has developed rapidly in China in recent years, although it still faces the shortage of anesthesiologists to handle pre-anesthesia routine for day surgery.
We hypothesized that Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) may assist anesthesiologists in preoperative assessment and answer questions on the patients' concerns.
The aim of this study was to examine the ability of ChatGPT in pre-operative risk assessment and its accuracy to answer questions regarding knowledge and management for day surgery anesthesia.
Methods
150 patient profiles were generated to simulate day surgery patient presentations, with complications of varying acuity and severity.
Both ChatGPT group and expert group has to evaluate 150 patients for their ASA classification and whether day surgery was recommended.
Then ChatGPT was asked to answer 145 questions about day surgery anesthesia that represented the most common issues encountered in clinical practice.
The performance of ChatGPT was assessed and graded independently by two experienced anesthesiologists.
Results
A total of 150 patients for assessment were included in the study (74 males [49.
5%] and 76 females [50.
7%]).
There was no difference between ChatGPT group and the expert group for ASA classification and assessment of anesthesia risk in the patients (P > 0.
05).
When comes to day surgery recommendation, for patients with certain comorbidities (ASA ≥ II), the expert group was inclined to need further examination or treatment, the proportion of conclusions made by ChatGPT was smaller (ChatGPT n (%) vs.
expert n (%): day surgery can be performed, 67 (47.
9) vs.
31(25.
4); need further treatment and evaluation, 56 (37.
3) vs.
66 (44.
0); day surgery is not recommended, 18 (12.
9) vs.
29 (9.
3), P < 0.
05).
We showed that ChatGPT had extensive knowledge related to day surgery anesthesia (94.
0% correct), with most of the points (70%) considered comprehensive.
The performance was better in the domains of peri-anesthesia concerns, lifestyle, and emotional support.
Conclusions
ChatGPT has certain reference value for ASA classification and assessment of anesthesia risk in patients.
ChatGPT can also be trusted to answer questions and concerns related to pre-anesthesia and therefore has the potential to provide important assistance in clinical work.
Related Results
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
Many researchers utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to aid their research endeavors. This study seeks to assess and contrast the performance of three sophis...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
CHATGPT ASSISTANCE ON BIOCHEMISTRY LEARNING OUTCOMES OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS
CHATGPT ASSISTANCE ON BIOCHEMISTRY LEARNING OUTCOMES OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS
This research investigates the effect of ChatGPT on the learning outcomes of pre-service biology teachers. Sampling was done by purposive sampling in class A (treated with ChatGPT)...
Phrenic Nerve Block for Management of Post-Thoracic Outlet Decompression Cough: A Case Report and Literature Review
Phrenic Nerve Block for Management of Post-Thoracic Outlet Decompression Cough: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Thoracic outlet syndrome is a group of disorders arising from compressive forces on the neurovascular bundle in that region due to different etiologies. This...

