Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Perioperative immunonutrition in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy: the first meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

View through CrossRef
Summary Although several randomized controlled trials have been published in recent years, the effect of perioperative immunonutrition in esophageal cancer (EC) patients remains unclear. This initial meta-analysis was conducted to assess whether perioperative enteral immunonutrition reduces postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy for EC. Relevant randomized controlled trials published before 1st September 2019 were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. After the literature was screened, two researchers extracted the information and data from eligible studies according to predefined selection criteria. Obtained data were pooled and analyzed by RevMan 5.3 software. The results were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The heterogeneity among studies was tested by I2 test. Seven high-quality randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 606 patients, 311 of whom received immunonutrition before and after surgery, while 295 received perioperative standard nutrition. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative infection complications, including total infection complications (RR = 0.97, CI: 0.78–1.20, P = 0.76), pneumonia (RR = 0.97, CI: 0.71–1.33, P = 0.84), wound infection (RR = 0.80, CI: 0.46–1.40, P = 0.44), sepsis (RR = 1.35, CI: 0.67–2.71, P = 0.40), and urinary tract infection (RR = 0.87, CI: 0.54–1.40, P = 0.56). The prevalence of anastomotic leakage in the two groups was 9.4 and 5.4%, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR = 0.59, CI: 0.33–1.04, P = 0.07). Perioperative enteral immunonutrition provided no benefit in terms of the incidence of infection complications and anastomotic leakage in EC patients undergoing esophagectomy. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.
Title: Perioperative immunonutrition in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy: the first meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Description:
Summary Although several randomized controlled trials have been published in recent years, the effect of perioperative immunonutrition in esophageal cancer (EC) patients remains unclear.
This initial meta-analysis was conducted to assess whether perioperative enteral immunonutrition reduces postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy for EC.
Relevant randomized controlled trials published before 1st September 2019 were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases.
After the literature was screened, two researchers extracted the information and data from eligible studies according to predefined selection criteria.
Obtained data were pooled and analyzed by RevMan 5.
3 software.
The results were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
The heterogeneity among studies was tested by I2 test.
Seven high-quality randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 606 patients, 311 of whom received immunonutrition before and after surgery, while 295 received perioperative standard nutrition.
No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative infection complications, including total infection complications (RR = 0.
97, CI: 0.
78–1.
20, P = 0.
76), pneumonia (RR = 0.
97, CI: 0.
71–1.
33, P = 0.
84), wound infection (RR = 0.
80, CI: 0.
46–1.
40, P = 0.
44), sepsis (RR = 1.
35, CI: 0.
67–2.
71, P = 0.
40), and urinary tract infection (RR = 0.
87, CI: 0.
54–1.
40, P = 0.
56).
The prevalence of anastomotic leakage in the two groups was 9.
4 and 5.
4%, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR = 0.
59, CI: 0.
33–1.
04, P = 0.
07).
Perioperative enteral immunonutrition provided no benefit in terms of the incidence of infection complications and anastomotic leakage in EC patients undergoing esophagectomy.
Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

Related Results

Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
The analysis on Tiam2 for expression in esophageal carcinoma: A descriptive study
The analysis on Tiam2 for expression in esophageal carcinoma: A descriptive study
Rationale: To investigate T lymphoma invasion and metastasis inducing factor 2 (Tiam2) protein for expression in esophageal carcinoma and relationship with clinical fea...
Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy
Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy
Abstract Background The gold standard for treating resectable esophageal cancer is esophagectomy. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) is a technique that bri...

Back to Top