Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine with crystalloid co-loading for hemodynamic stability in parturient undergoing cesarean delivery at Dilla University Referral Hospital. A randomized controlled trial
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Background:
The main objective of this study is to assess the prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine for the prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in a parturient who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
Method:
A randomized controlled trial study was conducted at Dilla University hospital. Pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomized to either atropine prophylaxis (n = 33) or active prophylaxis (n = 33) for prevention of post-spinal hypotension. Sample sizes were calculated using a G-power version 3.1.9.2 getting a total of 66 participants. Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed. Paired sample t-test was used to compare each group change from baseline. Independent t-test and Manny Whitney tests were used based on the distribution of data. A statistically significant difference was determined at a p-value of ≤05.
Result:
Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure declined from the baseline in both groups after spinal anesthesia. Atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from the baseline during the first 60 min of initiation of spinal anesthesia (p > 0.05). Heart rates at the 15th and 20th minute were higher in the atropine group (p < 0.05). There is no statistically significant difference between groups regarding mean Apgar score, and neonatal outcome. The total crystalloid fluid given during the perioperative period is higher in the active prophylaxis group with a mean of 2151.5 ml compared to 1651.52 ml in the atropine group p = 0.002. The incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the active prophylaxis group compared to the atropine group but the difference is not statistically significant p > 0.05 as it was shown in the figure below.
Conclusion:
Prophylactic administration of atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from baseline. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower in the atropine group with no statistically significant difference.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine with crystalloid co-loading for hemodynamic stability in parturient undergoing cesarean delivery at Dilla University Referral Hospital. A randomized controlled trial
Description:
ABSTRACT
Background:
The main objective of this study is to assess the prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine for the prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in a parturient who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
Method:
A randomized controlled trial study was conducted at Dilla University hospital.
Pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomized to either atropine prophylaxis (n = 33) or active prophylaxis (n = 33) for prevention of post-spinal hypotension.
Sample sizes were calculated using a G-power version 3.
1.
9.
2 getting a total of 66 participants.
Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed.
Paired sample t-test was used to compare each group change from baseline.
Independent t-test and Manny Whitney tests were used based on the distribution of data.
A statistically significant difference was determined at a p-value of ≤05.
Result:
Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure declined from the baseline in both groups after spinal anesthesia.
Atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from the baseline during the first 60 min of initiation of spinal anesthesia (p > 0.
05).
Heart rates at the 15th and 20th minute were higher in the atropine group (p < 0.
05).
There is no statistically significant difference between groups regarding mean Apgar score, and neonatal outcome.
The total crystalloid fluid given during the perioperative period is higher in the active prophylaxis group with a mean of 2151.
5 ml compared to 1651.
52 ml in the atropine group p = 0.
002.
The incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the active prophylaxis group compared to the atropine group but the difference is not statistically significant p > 0.
05 as it was shown in the figure below.
Conclusion:
Prophylactic administration of atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from baseline.
The incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower in the atropine group with no statistically significant difference.
Related Results
Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Background: One of the primary reasons for an increase in cesarean sections is obstetricians’ uncertainty about labor trial safety following a previous cesarean section. The succes...
Comparison of Outcomes of Subsequent Delivery Among Previous Vacuum and Previous Second Stage Cesarean Section Delivery Mothers at Kawempe National Referral Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Comparison of Outcomes of Subsequent Delivery Among Previous Vacuum and Previous Second Stage Cesarean Section Delivery Mothers at Kawempe National Referral Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Introduction: The increasing trends in cesarean section (CS) with a decrease in operative vaginal deliveries is a major concern in health care system all over the ...
Continuous intravenous infusion of remifentanil improves the experience of parturient undergoing repeat cesarean section under epidural anesthesia
Continuous intravenous infusion of remifentanil improves the experience of parturient undergoing repeat cesarean section under epidural anesthesia
Abstract
Background: To observe the effects of intravenous remifentanil on maternal comfort, maternal and neonatal safety during repeat cesarean section under epidural anes...
Nasal and Intravenous Administration of Dexmedetomidine to Prevent the Emergence Agitation After the Vascular Interventional Surgery in Children: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study
Nasal and Intravenous Administration of Dexmedetomidine to Prevent the Emergence Agitation After the Vascular Interventional Surgery in Children: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study
Abstract
Introduction: Dexmedetomidine reduces the incidences of postanesthetic restlessness and hemodynamic fluctuations in children within acceptable ranges. Dexmedetomid...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Effect of 0.01% atropine eyedrops on intraocular pressure in schoolchildren: a randomized clinical trial
Effect of 0.01% atropine eyedrops on intraocular pressure in schoolchildren: a randomized clinical trial
AIM: To assess the effect of 0.01% atropine eye drops on intraocular pressure (IOP) in myopic children.
METHODS: A placebo-controlled, double-masked, randomized study. Totally 220 ...
The impact of pre‐operative intravenous iron on quality of life after colorectal cancer surgery: outcomes from the intravenous iron in colorectal cancer‐associated anaemia (IVICA) trial
The impact of pre‐operative intravenous iron on quality of life after colorectal cancer surgery: outcomes from the intravenous iron in colorectal cancer‐associated anaemia (IVICA) trial
SummaryAnaemia is associated with a reduction in quality of life, and is common in patients with colorectal cancer . We recently reported the findings of the intravenous iron in co...

