Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine with crystalloid co-loading for hemodynamic stability in parturient undergoing cesarean delivery at Dilla University Referral Hospital. A randomized controlled trial

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT Background: The main objective of this study is to assess the prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine for the prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in a parturient who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Method: A randomized controlled trial study was conducted at Dilla University hospital. Pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomized to either atropine prophylaxis (n = 33) or active prophylaxis (n = 33) for prevention of post-spinal hypotension. Sample sizes were calculated using a G-power version 3.1.9.2 getting a total of 66 participants. Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed. Paired sample t-test was used to compare each group change from baseline. Independent t-test and Manny Whitney tests were used based on the distribution of data. A statistically significant difference was determined at a p-value of ≤05. Result: Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure declined from the baseline in both groups after spinal anesthesia. Atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from the baseline during the first 60 min of initiation of spinal anesthesia (p > 0.05). Heart rates at the 15th and 20th minute were higher in the atropine group (p < 0.05). There is no statistically significant difference between groups regarding mean Apgar score, and neonatal outcome. The total crystalloid fluid given during the perioperative period is higher in the active prophylaxis group with a mean of 2151.5 ml compared to 1651.52 ml in the atropine group p = 0.002. The incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the active prophylaxis group compared to the atropine group but the difference is not statistically significant p > 0.05 as it was shown in the figure below. Conclusion: Prophylactic administration of atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from baseline. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower in the atropine group with no statistically significant difference.
Title: Prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine with crystalloid co-loading for hemodynamic stability in parturient undergoing cesarean delivery at Dilla University Referral Hospital. A randomized controlled trial
Description:
ABSTRACT Background: The main objective of this study is to assess the prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine for the prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in a parturient who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
Method: A randomized controlled trial study was conducted at Dilla University hospital.
Pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomized to either atropine prophylaxis (n = 33) or active prophylaxis (n = 33) for prevention of post-spinal hypotension.
Sample sizes were calculated using a G-power version 3.
1.
9.
2 getting a total of 66 participants.
Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed.
Paired sample t-test was used to compare each group change from baseline.
Independent t-test and Manny Whitney tests were used based on the distribution of data.
A statistically significant difference was determined at a p-value of ≤05.
Result: Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure declined from the baseline in both groups after spinal anesthesia.
Atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from the baseline during the first 60 min of initiation of spinal anesthesia (p > 0.
05).
Heart rates at the 15th and 20th minute were higher in the atropine group (p < 0.
05).
There is no statistically significant difference between groups regarding mean Apgar score, and neonatal outcome.
The total crystalloid fluid given during the perioperative period is higher in the active prophylaxis group with a mean of 2151.
5 ml compared to 1651.
52 ml in the atropine group p = 0.
002.
The incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the active prophylaxis group compared to the atropine group but the difference is not statistically significant p > 0.
05 as it was shown in the figure below.
Conclusion: Prophylactic administration of atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from baseline.
The incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower in the atropine group with no statistically significant difference.

Related Results

Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Background: One of the primary reasons for an increase in cesarean sections is obstetricians’ uncertainty about labor trial safety following a previous cesarean section. The succes...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Effect of 0.01% atropine eyedrops on intraocular pressure in schoolchildren: a randomized clinical trial
Effect of 0.01% atropine eyedrops on intraocular pressure in schoolchildren: a randomized clinical trial
AIM: To assess the effect of 0.01% atropine eye drops on intraocular pressure (IOP) in myopic children. METHODS: A placebo-controlled, double-masked, randomized study. Totally 220 ...

Back to Top