Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Porosity Distribution of Carbonate Reservoirs Using Low Field NMR
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Alberta contains significant deposits of oil and gas in carbonate formations. Carbonates tend to have fairly tight matrix structures, resulting in low primary porosity and permeability. As a result, laboratory characterization of carbonate properties is a slow and tedious process. Low field NMR is an emerging technology that shows great promise in rock characterization. In a single NMR experiment, information on porosity and pore size distribution of a carbonate sample can be determined. In this paper, low field NMR technology is investigated for determining primary and secondary porosity through the interpretation of NMR spectra.
The data set for this experimental work consists of a large collection of core samples from various fields in Alberta and Saskatchewan. The CT data of fully saturated cores were converted to porosity, and this was found to agree well with gas expansion porosity. The primary and secondary porosity fractions were also obtained from the CT data, and were used to find corresponding NMR cutoff values that separate the NMR spectra into primary and secondary porosity.
A distinct relationship was observed between the primary porosity fraction and Swi. The fraction of NMR amplitude in the last peak can also be correlated to CT secondary porosity. Another important relationship observed is that the T2gm of the last NMR peak correlates well with the cutoff between primary and secondary porosity. This implies that information from the fully saturated NMR spectrum can be used to estimate primary and secondary porosity fractions.
Introduction
Porosity of carbonates is a complex problem that is studied by only a few1. Secondary porosity and primary porosity are not easily distinguishable unless the primary pores and the diagenesis processes that occurred are studied1. Despite all these difficulties, it is very important to recognize the different porosity types in carbonates to help in developing carbonate reservoirs and to estimate the recovery efficiency in these reservoirs.
As various researchers have stated, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) can capture pore size information of the porous media2,3,4. Thus, in theory, it describes both the primary and secondary porosity. However, separating the signal into primary and secondary components remains a daunting task. Part of this difficulty arises from the fact that there is no clear distinction between primary and secondary pore size distributions as they overlap with each other.
Chang et al. have previously tried to separate the signal of vugs in NMR response3. In carbonates, the definition of vugs can be quite important. In this case Chang et al. used the term "vugs" to describe cavities that are formed in the matrix by diagenesis, with sizes ranging from about 100 µm to cavern size. They reported that the vugs manifest themselves as a peak at the far end of the T2 distribution, with pores larger than 100 µm having T2 > 1s. They also noted that in vuggy carbonates, the vugs weakly contribute to flow3. Straley et al. later found that to minimize the errors in estimating permeability, the T2c value which separates the primary pores from the vugs was found to be 750 ms5.
Title: Porosity Distribution of Carbonate Reservoirs Using Low Field NMR
Description:
Abstract
Alberta contains significant deposits of oil and gas in carbonate formations.
Carbonates tend to have fairly tight matrix structures, resulting in low primary porosity and permeability.
As a result, laboratory characterization of carbonate properties is a slow and tedious process.
Low field NMR is an emerging technology that shows great promise in rock characterization.
In a single NMR experiment, information on porosity and pore size distribution of a carbonate sample can be determined.
In this paper, low field NMR technology is investigated for determining primary and secondary porosity through the interpretation of NMR spectra.
The data set for this experimental work consists of a large collection of core samples from various fields in Alberta and Saskatchewan.
The CT data of fully saturated cores were converted to porosity, and this was found to agree well with gas expansion porosity.
The primary and secondary porosity fractions were also obtained from the CT data, and were used to find corresponding NMR cutoff values that separate the NMR spectra into primary and secondary porosity.
A distinct relationship was observed between the primary porosity fraction and Swi.
The fraction of NMR amplitude in the last peak can also be correlated to CT secondary porosity.
Another important relationship observed is that the T2gm of the last NMR peak correlates well with the cutoff between primary and secondary porosity.
This implies that information from the fully saturated NMR spectrum can be used to estimate primary and secondary porosity fractions.
Introduction
Porosity of carbonates is a complex problem that is studied by only a few1.
Secondary porosity and primary porosity are not easily distinguishable unless the primary pores and the diagenesis processes that occurred are studied1.
Despite all these difficulties, it is very important to recognize the different porosity types in carbonates to help in developing carbonate reservoirs and to estimate the recovery efficiency in these reservoirs.
As various researchers have stated, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) can capture pore size information of the porous media2,3,4.
Thus, in theory, it describes both the primary and secondary porosity.
However, separating the signal into primary and secondary components remains a daunting task.
Part of this difficulty arises from the fact that there is no clear distinction between primary and secondary pore size distributions as they overlap with each other.
Chang et al.
have previously tried to separate the signal of vugs in NMR response3.
In carbonates, the definition of vugs can be quite important.
In this case Chang et al.
used the term "vugs" to describe cavities that are formed in the matrix by diagenesis, with sizes ranging from about 100 µm to cavern size.
They reported that the vugs manifest themselves as a peak at the far end of the T2 distribution, with pores larger than 100 µm having T2 > 1s.
They also noted that in vuggy carbonates, the vugs weakly contribute to flow3.
Straley et al.
later found that to minimize the errors in estimating permeability, the T2c value which separates the primary pores from the vugs was found to be 750 ms5.
Related Results
Advances in Carbonate Characterization Using Low Field NMR
Advances in Carbonate Characterization Using Low Field NMR
Abstract
Western Canada contains significant deposits of oil and gas in carbonate formations. Carbonates have fairly complicated pore structures with various type...
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Extended abstract
Tight sands gas, coalbed methane and shale gas are three kinds of typical unconventional natural gas. With the decrease of conventional oil and gas...
Learnings from a New Slim Hole LWD NMR Technology
Learnings from a New Slim Hole LWD NMR Technology
Abstract
This paper presents recent experience with a new 4 ¾-in logging-while-drilling (LWD) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tool. Data from several wells drilled ...
Application of Modern NMR Logging for Mixed-Lithology Carbonate Reservoirs (A Case Study)
Application of Modern NMR Logging for Mixed-Lithology Carbonate Reservoirs (A Case Study)
Abstract
The following is the presentation of two field examples of NMR logs in carbonate reservoirs with low porosity and permeability. The wells were drilled wi...
Key Insights from Comparing LWD and Core NMR in Heavy Oil Carbonates
Key Insights from Comparing LWD and Core NMR in Heavy Oil Carbonates
Abstract
Recent advances in LWD (logging-while-drilling) NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) have enabled the simultaneous measurement of T1 and T2. These advances b...
Porosity Signature of Lunar Impact Basins
Porosity Signature of Lunar Impact Basins
The upper portion of the lunar highland crust is known to show a wide range of porosities between 3 and 23% (Wieczorek et al., 2013). Impact cratering seems to be the prim...
Dynamic Field Division of Hydrocarbon Migration, Accumulation and Hydrocarbon Enrichment Rules in Sedimentary Basins
Dynamic Field Division of Hydrocarbon Migration, Accumulation and Hydrocarbon Enrichment Rules in Sedimentary Basins
Abstract:Hydrocarbon distribution rules in the deep and shallow parts of sedimentary basins are considerably different, particularly in the following four aspects. First, the criti...
Carbonate Depositional Sequences and Systems Tracts—Responses of Carbonate Platforms to Relative Sea-Level Changes
Carbonate Depositional Sequences and Systems Tracts—Responses of Carbonate Platforms to Relative Sea-Level Changes
Abstract
Standard carbonate facies models are widely used to interpret paleoenvironments, but they do not address how carbonate platforms are affected by relative...

