Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Epistemic extensions of substructural inquisitive logics
View through CrossRef
Abstract
In this paper, we study the epistemic extensions of distributive substructural inquisitive logics. Substructural inquisitive logics are logics of questions based on substructural logics of declarative sentences. They generalize basic inquisitive logic which is based on the classical logic of declaratives. We show that if the underlying substructural logic is distributive, the generalization can be extended to embrace also the epistemic modalities ‘knowing whether’ and ‘wondering whether’ that are applicable to questions. We construct a semantic framework for a language of propositional substructural logics enriched with a question-forming operator (inquisitive disjunction) and epistemic modalities. We show that within this framework, one can define a canonical model with suitable properties for any (syntactically defined) epistemic inquisitive logic. This leads to a general approach to completeness proofs for such logics. A deductive system for the weakest epistemic inquisitive logic is described and completeness proved for this special case using the general method.
Title: Epistemic extensions of substructural inquisitive logics
Description:
Abstract
In this paper, we study the epistemic extensions of distributive substructural inquisitive logics.
Substructural inquisitive logics are logics of questions based on substructural logics of declarative sentences.
They generalize basic inquisitive logic which is based on the classical logic of declaratives.
We show that if the underlying substructural logic is distributive, the generalization can be extended to embrace also the epistemic modalities ‘knowing whether’ and ‘wondering whether’ that are applicable to questions.
We construct a semantic framework for a language of propositional substructural logics enriched with a question-forming operator (inquisitive disjunction) and epistemic modalities.
We show that within this framework, one can define a canonical model with suitable properties for any (syntactically defined) epistemic inquisitive logic.
This leads to a general approach to completeness proofs for such logics.
A deductive system for the weakest epistemic inquisitive logic is described and completeness proved for this special case using the general method.
Related Results
Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
The concepts of epistemic injustice and epistemic oppression both aim to track obstacles to epistemic agencyーi.e., forms of epistemic exclusionーthat are undue and persistent. Indee...
Temas Epistêmicos, não Epistêmicos no Ensino
Temas Epistêmicos, não Epistêmicos no Ensino
Resumo
A Epistemologia da Ciência é um campo de estudo que permite analisar o desenvolvimento da ciência em uma postura dialética, que qualifica as questões internas à Ciência, rel...
Epistemic Injustice
Epistemic Injustice
<p>“Epistemic injustice” is a fairly new concept in philosophy, which, loosely speaking, describes a kind of injustice that occurs at the intersection of structures of the so...
The Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Beliefs
The Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Beliefs
Abstract
Ideally, we would have beliefs that satisfy norms of truth and rationality, as well as fostering the acquisition, retention and use of other relevant inform...
Investigating and developing undergraduate students' representational competence in physics in the context of epistemic practices of science
Investigating and developing undergraduate students' representational competence in physics in the context of epistemic practices of science
This study aimed to understand the varied ways in which undergraduate students demonstrate representational competence in physics in the context of epistemic practices, how these v...
Epistemic relativism
Epistemic relativism
Broadly speaking, relativism is the view that, at least in some domains, everything or every truth is relative to some standards so that, when two or more people disagree about the...
Overinterpreting Logics
Overinterpreting Logics
Paraconsistent logics, minimally, are not explosive; that is, on these logics, not everything follows from a contradiction of the form ‘A and not-A’. Dialetheists, who argue that s...
The epistemology of disagreement
The epistemology of disagreement
The epistemology of disagreement studies the epistemically relevant aspects of the interaction between parties who hold diverging opinions about a given subject matter. The central...


