Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Waterpipe Tobacco Warnings: An Experimental Study Among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Young Adults
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Waterpipe tobacco (WT) smoking by young adults remains high and misperceptions are common. Product warnings can increase knowledge of harms and reduce use. The goal of this study was to test warning statements, including the FDA-required nicotine warning (prior to implementation), on young adults’ thinking about harms of and discouragement from WT smoking.
Methods
We conducted a between-subjects experiment in a nationally representative telephone survey of 1152 young adults aged 18–29. Participants were randomly assigned to hear one of five warning statements and reported how much, on a 4-point scale, the warning made them think about the harms and discouraged them from WT smoking.
Results
The sample was 36.8% female, 57.8% white, 20.2% Black, 24.1% Hispanic, with a mean age of 23.2 (SE = 0.25). Under half (43.5%) had ever smoked WT. There were significant differences among the statements on both thinking about harms (p < .0001) and discouragement (p < .0001). The FDA-required “nicotine” warning led to the lowest thinking about harms (M = 2.85, SE = 0.08) and was the least discouraging (M = 2.86, SE = 0.08), while the “100 cigarettes” warning resulted in the greatest thinking about harms (M = 3.62, SE = 0.05) and was the most discouraging (M = 3.56, SE = 0.06).
Conclusions
The nicotine warning resulted in the lowest levels of thinking about harms and discouragement from WT smoking, suggesting limited impact. However, a warning focused on comparing smoke inhalation from WT smoking to cigarettes seems promising. Warnings should cover a broad range of WT health effects, and possibly comparisons to cigarettes. Findings also have implications for the content of international waterpipe warnings.
Implications
This study indicates that the nicotine warning is the least effective at making young adults think about the harms of and discouraging WT smoking. The FDA and other countries should consider requiring warnings to cover a broader range of health harms, misperceptions, and possibly comparisons to cigarettes.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Waterpipe Tobacco Warnings: An Experimental Study Among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Young Adults
Description:
Abstract
Background
Waterpipe tobacco (WT) smoking by young adults remains high and misperceptions are common.
Product warnings can increase knowledge of harms and reduce use.
The goal of this study was to test warning statements, including the FDA-required nicotine warning (prior to implementation), on young adults’ thinking about harms of and discouragement from WT smoking.
Methods
We conducted a between-subjects experiment in a nationally representative telephone survey of 1152 young adults aged 18–29.
Participants were randomly assigned to hear one of five warning statements and reported how much, on a 4-point scale, the warning made them think about the harms and discouraged them from WT smoking.
Results
The sample was 36.
8% female, 57.
8% white, 20.
2% Black, 24.
1% Hispanic, with a mean age of 23.
2 (SE = 0.
25).
Under half (43.
5%) had ever smoked WT.
There were significant differences among the statements on both thinking about harms (p < .
0001) and discouragement (p < .
0001).
The FDA-required “nicotine” warning led to the lowest thinking about harms (M = 2.
85, SE = 0.
08) and was the least discouraging (M = 2.
86, SE = 0.
08), while the “100 cigarettes” warning resulted in the greatest thinking about harms (M = 3.
62, SE = 0.
05) and was the most discouraging (M = 3.
56, SE = 0.
06).
Conclusions
The nicotine warning resulted in the lowest levels of thinking about harms and discouragement from WT smoking, suggesting limited impact.
However, a warning focused on comparing smoke inhalation from WT smoking to cigarettes seems promising.
Warnings should cover a broad range of WT health effects, and possibly comparisons to cigarettes.
Findings also have implications for the content of international waterpipe warnings.
Implications
This study indicates that the nicotine warning is the least effective at making young adults think about the harms of and discouraging WT smoking.
The FDA and other countries should consider requiring warnings to cover a broader range of health harms, misperceptions, and possibly comparisons to cigarettes.
Related Results
Similarity in the microbial community structure of tobacco from geographically similar regions
Similarity in the microbial community structure of tobacco from geographically similar regions
Abstract
To investigate the structural and functional similarities of microbial communities in burnt-sweetness alcoholized tobacco as a function of distance from the equato...
Are Farmers Willing to Substitute Tobacco Cultivation? Evidence From Lichuan City, China
Are Farmers Willing to Substitute Tobacco Cultivation? Evidence From Lichuan City, China
Abstract
Introduction
Tobacco crop substitution is a critical element in implementing comprehensive tobacco control policies. Un...
Temporal and Thematic Analysis of Promotional Waterpipe-Related Posts on Twitter/X in the US
Temporal and Thematic Analysis of Promotional Waterpipe-Related Posts on Twitter/X in the US
AbstractIntroductionWaterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS), also known as hookah, shisha, or narghile, is particularly popular among young people in the United States (US). WTS poses seri...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Utilisation of waterpipe tobacco imagery in cigarette advertising: a case study of American tobacco company and RJ Reynolds tobacco company
Utilisation of waterpipe tobacco imagery in cigarette advertising: a case study of American tobacco company and RJ Reynolds tobacco company
BackgroundTobacco companies employ various advertising methods, including immersive consumer experiences and cultural imagery, to promote their products. To our knowledge, no prior...
Developing Pictorial Cigarillo Warnings: Insights From Focus Groups
Developing Pictorial Cigarillo Warnings: Insights From Focus Groups
AbstractIntroductionThe Food and Drug Administration (FDA) selected six text-only warnings for cigarillos to be implemented on packaging and advertising. Pictorial warnings are mor...
Severe weather warnings for Sofia Bulgaria: May - September 2010-2019
Severe weather warnings for Sofia Bulgaria: May - September 2010-2019
Severe weather monitoring and forecasting is the prime task of the National Meteorological Services according to World Meteorological Organization Guidelines (WMO).  Since...
“Non-delisting”: risk warning and research and development expenditure
“Non-delisting”: risk warning and research and development expenditure
PurposeThis paper investigates the relationship between stock risk supervision mechanisms and corporate innovation decisions, using China’s non-delisting risk warning system as a c...

