Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Trends and challenges in program evaluation: an interview with Chris Coryn

View through CrossRef
<p>Nesta entrevista, Chris Coryn, diretor do Programa de Doutorado Interdisciplinar em Avaliação, professor de Avaliação na Western  Michigan University e editor-executivo do Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, explica conceitos e características essenci-  ais da avaliação de programas, dimensão da avaliação ainda pouco explorada na área educacional no Brasil. O pesquisador comenta sobre alguns dos desafios atuais do campo da avaliação de programas, destacando tendências metodológicas e questões éticas recor- rentes na prática avaliativa profissional; discute conhecimentos, habilidades e competências que deveriam ser consideradas na formação do avaliador profissional; e critica abordagens avaliativas atuais que desconectam a avaliação de programas da atribuição de valor e da discussão sobre valores e valoração que, a seu ver, são seus elementos distintivos.</p><p><strong>Palavras-chave</strong>: Avaliação de Programas, Desenhos de Pesquisa Avaliativa, Formação do Avaliador, Abordagens Avaliativas.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Tendencias y desafíos en la evaluación de programas educativos: entrevista con Chris Coryn</strong></p><p>En esta entrevista Chris Coryn, director del Programa de Doctorado Interdisciplinario en Evaluación, profesor de Evaluación en la Western Michigan University y editor ejecutivo del Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, explica conceptos y características esenciales de la evaluación de programas, dimensión de la evaluación todavía poco explorada en   el área educacional en Brasil. El investigador comenta algunos de los actuales desafíos del campo de la evaluación de programas, destacando tendencias metodológicas y temas éticos recurrentes en la práctica evaluativa profesional; discute conocimientos, habilidades y competencias que habría que considerar en la formación del evaluador profesional; y critica abordajes evaluativos actuales que desconectan la evaluación de programas de atribución de valor y de la discusión sobre valores y valoración que, en su opinión, son sus elementos distintivos.</p><p><strong>Palabras clave</strong>: Evaluación de Programas, Diseños de Investigación Evaluativa, Formación del Evaluador, Abordajes Evaluativos.</p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US">Trends and challenges in program evaluation: an interview with Chris Coryn</span></strong></p><p style="margin: 0cm -0.05pt 6pt 0cm; text-align: justify; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US">In this interview, Chris Coryn, Director of the Interdisciplinary PhD in Evaluation (IDPE) Program, Professor of Evaluation at Western Michigan University (WMU) and executive editor of the Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, explains key concepts and characteristics of program evaluation, a dimension of evaluation that is still unexplored in the educational area in Brazil. The researcher comments on some of the current challenges in the field of program evaluation, highlighting methodological tendencies and ethical issues in professional practice. He also discusses knowledge, competences and skills that should be considered in the training of the professional evaluator. Coryn criticizes current evaluative approaches that disconnect program evaluation from values and valuing, which, in his view, are distinctive elements of program evaluation.</span></p><p style="margin: 0cm -0.05pt 6pt 0cm; text-align: justify; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"><strong>Keywords</strong>: Program Evaluation, Evaluative Research Design, Evaluator Training, Evaluation Approaches.</span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p>
Title: Trends and challenges in program evaluation: an interview with Chris Coryn
Description:
<p>Nesta entrevista, Chris Coryn, diretor do Programa de Doutorado Interdisciplinar em Avaliação, professor de Avaliação na Western  Michigan University e editor-executivo do Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, explica conceitos e características essenci-  ais da avaliação de programas, dimensão da avaliação ainda pouco explorada na área educacional no Brasil.
O pesquisador comenta sobre alguns dos desafios atuais do campo da avaliação de programas, destacando tendências metodológicas e questões éticas recor- rentes na prática avaliativa profissional; discute conhecimentos, habilidades e competências que deveriam ser consideradas na formação do avaliador profissional; e critica abordagens avaliativas atuais que desconectam a avaliação de programas da atribuição de valor e da discussão sobre valores e valoração que, a seu ver, são seus elementos distintivos.
</p><p><strong>Palavras-chave</strong>: Avaliação de Programas, Desenhos de Pesquisa Avaliativa, Formação do Avaliador, Abordagens Avaliativas.
</p><p> </p><p><strong>Tendencias y desafíos en la evaluación de programas educativos: entrevista con Chris Coryn</strong></p><p>En esta entrevista Chris Coryn, director del Programa de Doctorado Interdisciplinario en Evaluación, profesor de Evaluación en la Western Michigan University y editor ejecutivo del Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, explica conceptos y características esenciales de la evaluación de programas, dimensión de la evaluación todavía poco explorada en   el área educacional en Brasil.
El investigador comenta algunos de los actuales desafíos del campo de la evaluación de programas, destacando tendencias metodológicas y temas éticos recurrentes en la práctica evaluativa profesional; discute conocimientos, habilidades y competencias que habría que considerar en la formación del evaluador profesional; y critica abordajes evaluativos actuales que desconectan la evaluación de programas de atribución de valor y de la discusión sobre valores y valoración que, en su opinión, son sus elementos distintivos.
</p><p><strong>Palabras clave</strong>: Evaluación de Programas, Diseños de Investigación Evaluativa, Formación del Evaluador, Abordajes Evaluativos.
</p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US">Trends and challenges in program evaluation: an interview with Chris Coryn</span></strong></p><p style="margin: 0cm -0.
05pt 6pt 0cm; text-align: justify; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US">In this interview, Chris Coryn, Director of the Interdisciplinary PhD in Evaluation (IDPE) Program, Professor of Evaluation at Western Michigan University (WMU) and executive editor of the Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, explains key concepts and characteristics of program evaluation, a dimension of evaluation that is still unexplored in the educational area in Brazil.
The researcher comments on some of the current challenges in the field of program evaluation, highlighting methodological tendencies and ethical issues in professional practice.
He also discusses knowledge, competences and skills that should be considered in the training of the professional evaluator.
Coryn criticizes current evaluative approaches that disconnect program evaluation from values and valuing, which, in his view, are distinctive elements of program evaluation.
</span></p><p style="margin: 0cm -0.
05pt 6pt 0cm; text-align: justify; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"><strong>Keywords</strong>: Program Evaluation, Evaluative Research Design, Evaluator Training, Evaluation Approaches.
</span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p>.

Related Results

"Best Tradition": CREATE, JCSEE and the Program Evaluation Standards
"Best Tradition": CREATE, JCSEE and the Program Evaluation Standards
Background: Evaluation “is a task in the best tradition of the most abstract theoretical science as well as the most practical applied science” (Scriven, 1968, p .9). The Program E...
Efektivitas Program Pemerintah Kawasan Rumah Pangan Lestari (KRPL) terhadap Pola Pangan Harapan Rumah Tangga di Kota Banda Aceh
Efektivitas Program Pemerintah Kawasan Rumah Pangan Lestari (KRPL) terhadap Pola Pangan Harapan Rumah Tangga di Kota Banda Aceh
Abstrak. Dalam rangka mewujudkan kemandirian pangan, kementerian pertanian melalui Badan Litbang Pertanian mengembangkan Kawasan Rumah Pangan Lestari atau yang disebut dengan KRPL,...
STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI DALAM PROGRAM MUTIARA HIKMAH DI RADIO RASIKA FM
STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI DALAM PROGRAM MUTIARA HIKMAH DI RADIO RASIKA FM
<p><em>This research is to know how communication strategy in program of Mutiara Hikmah at Radio Rasika Fm. The research used is qualitative research, taking place in R...
Program Evaluation
Program Evaluation
Program evaluation involves making use of social science research methods to judge the quality of a program or policy. It typically is designed to provide information to program st...
The Role of Internal Variability in Seasonal Hindcast Trend Errors
The Role of Internal Variability in Seasonal Hindcast Trend Errors
Abstract Initialized hindcasts inherit knowledge of the observed climate state, so studies of multidecadal trends in seasonal and decadal hindcast models have focused on the ensemb...
Evaluation in Canada
Evaluation in Canada
The Canadian provinces continue to be a source of evaluation-related activities and events such as Evaluation 2005, Beaulac, Goodine, and Aubry’s work on a reportcard of homelessne...
Evaluation Practices of Community College Faculty Development Programs
Evaluation Practices of Community College Faculty Development Programs
The purpose of this quantitative study was to determine the current state of community college faculty development program evaluation and identify possible influences on evaluation...

Back to Top