Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Obscured Goodness
View through CrossRef
Chapter 4 examines what it means to affirm creation’s goodness in light of the abundance of pain and suffering in the world. It examines how the appearing of creation’s goodness becomes obfuscated in the midst of bodily suffering and death, which in turn, challenges the credibility of the doctrine. In response, the latter half of the chapter explores how affirming creation’s goodness does not require one to diminish the significance of suffering and death, but instead, affirms that all suffering life is worthy of compassion and care. This position is developed with reference to a Christological reading of creation’s goodness that engages the work of Elizabeth Johnson and Emmanuel Falque. The chapter concludes by arguing that creation’s goodness validates a wide spectrum of experiences and is not dependent on evaluating the weight of good versus bad phenomena in one’s life.
Title: Obscured Goodness
Description:
Chapter 4 examines what it means to affirm creation’s goodness in light of the abundance of pain and suffering in the world.
It examines how the appearing of creation’s goodness becomes obfuscated in the midst of bodily suffering and death, which in turn, challenges the credibility of the doctrine.
In response, the latter half of the chapter explores how affirming creation’s goodness does not require one to diminish the significance of suffering and death, but instead, affirms that all suffering life is worthy of compassion and care.
This position is developed with reference to a Christological reading of creation’s goodness that engages the work of Elizabeth Johnson and Emmanuel Falque.
The chapter concludes by arguing that creation’s goodness validates a wide spectrum of experiences and is not dependent on evaluating the weight of good versus bad phenomena in one’s life.
Related Results
New insight into Mencius’ theory of the original goodness in human nature
New insight into Mencius’ theory of the original goodness in human nature
In Mencius’ theory of the original goodness in human nature, fate is the original source of xing (nature). Heart is the appearance of nature. There are two aspects to nature and he...
John Duns Scotus's (Non)Naturalism about Goodness
John Duns Scotus's (Non)Naturalism about Goodness
Abstract
G. E. Moore argued that goodness is not identical to any natural properties on the basis of the Open Question Argument. John Duns Scotus agrees, and for the...
Goodness qua Goodness: a Concluding Scientific Postscript?
Goodness qua Goodness: a Concluding Scientific Postscript?
Abstract
Aristotle argues that since neither being nor goodness is univocal, there cannot be a science of either. Every science requires a unified domain, and a doma...
Martin Luther and Love
Martin Luther and Love
The questions of love’s nature and its different forms were crucial to Martin Luther from the beginning of his theological career. Already as a young monk and theologian he struggl...
Good, theories of the
Good, theories of the
‘Good’ is the most general term of positive evaluation, used to recommend or express approval in a wide range of contexts. It indicates that a thing is desirable or worthy of choic...
Assessing Goodness of Fit of Hybrid Choice Models
Assessing Goodness of Fit of Hybrid Choice Models
Recent research in travel behavior has contributed numerous technical developments for the estimation of discrete choice models with latent attributes, including the hybrid choice ...
Aristoteles und der naturalistische Fehlschluß
Aristoteles und der naturalistische Fehlschluß
Is Aristotle’s ethics founded on a naturalistic fallacy? This article examines in detail the criticism which was levelled at Aristotle by George Edward Moore in his Principia Ethic...
Amos ecology
Amos ecology
The environmental crises of our world have propelled ecological theology to the forefront of biblical studies today. Ecohermeneutics is a rich, growing field of research that offer...

