Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Improving text recall with multiple summaries

View through CrossRef
Background. QuikScan (QS) is an innovative design that aims to improve accessibility, comprehensibility, and subsequent recall of expository text by means of frequent within‐document summaries that are formatted as numbered list items. The numbers in the QS summaries correspond to numbers placed in the body of the document where the summarized ideas are discussed in full.Aim. To examine the influence of QS summaries on participants’ perceptions of text quality (i.e., comprehensibility, structure, and interest) and recall, an experimental – control group design compared the effects of a QS text with a structured abstract (SA) text.Sample. Forty psychology students participated voluntarily or received course credits.Method. Students first read a control (SA) or experimental (QS) text on flashbulb memory (FBM). Next, their perceptions of text quality were measured through a questionnaire. Recall was assessed with an open answer test with items for facts, comprehension and higher order information.Results. Perceptions of text quality did not vary across conditions. But QS did lead to significantly and substantially (d= 1.57) higher overall recall scores. Participants with the QS text performed significantly better on all item types than participants with the SA text.Conclusion. Studying a QS text led to a substantial improvement in recall compared to an SA text. Further research is needed to examine how readers study QS texts and whether a text model hypothesis or a repetition effect hypothesis accounts for the effectiveness. The first hypothesis posits that the QS summaries support the reader in constructing a text schema. The second attributes the effects of these summaries to their repetition of text topics.
Title: Improving text recall with multiple summaries
Description:
Background.
 QuikScan (QS) is an innovative design that aims to improve accessibility, comprehensibility, and subsequent recall of expository text by means of frequent within‐document summaries that are formatted as numbered list items.
The numbers in the QS summaries correspond to numbers placed in the body of the document where the summarized ideas are discussed in full.
Aim.
 To examine the influence of QS summaries on participants’ perceptions of text quality (i.
e.
, comprehensibility, structure, and interest) and recall, an experimental – control group design compared the effects of a QS text with a structured abstract (SA) text.
Sample.
 Forty psychology students participated voluntarily or received course credits.
Method.
 Students first read a control (SA) or experimental (QS) text on flashbulb memory (FBM).
Next, their perceptions of text quality were measured through a questionnaire.
Recall was assessed with an open answer test with items for facts, comprehension and higher order information.
Results.
 Perceptions of text quality did not vary across conditions.
But QS did lead to significantly and substantially (d= 1.
57) higher overall recall scores.
Participants with the QS text performed significantly better on all item types than participants with the SA text.
Conclusion.
 Studying a QS text led to a substantial improvement in recall compared to an SA text.
Further research is needed to examine how readers study QS texts and whether a text model hypothesis or a repetition effect hypothesis accounts for the effectiveness.
The first hypothesis posits that the QS summaries support the reader in constructing a text schema.
The second attributes the effects of these summaries to their repetition of text topics.

Related Results

Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
E-Press and Oppress
E-Press and Oppress
From elephants to ABBA fans, silicon to hormone, the following discussion uses a new research method to look at printed text, motion pictures and a te...
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background:#f9f9f4"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><b><spa...
QuikScan formatting as a means to improve text recall
QuikScan formatting as a means to improve text recall
PurposeQuikScan is an innovative text format that employs three prominent signaling devices – summaries, headings, and access cues – to make the reading of medium‐to‐long texts mor...
Λc Physics at BESIII
Λc Physics at BESIII
In 2014 BESIII collected a data sample of 567 [Formula: see text] at [Formula: see text] = 4.6 GeV, which is just above the [Formula: see text] pair production threshold. By analyz...
Transforming healthcare documentation: harnessing the potential of AI to generate discharge summaries
Transforming healthcare documentation: harnessing the potential of AI to generate discharge summaries
BackgroundHospital discharge summaries play an essential role in informing GPs of recent admissions to ensure excellent continuity of care and prevent adverse events; however, they...
Optimizing Warnings on E-Cigarette Advertisements
Optimizing Warnings on E-Cigarette Advertisements
AbstractIntroductionWe examined the effect of visual optimizations on warning text recall.MethodsWe used Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to recruit 1854 young adult (18–34 years) electron...
Strong vb-dominating and vb-independent sets of a graph
Strong vb-dominating and vb-independent sets of a graph
Let [Formula: see text] be a graph. A vertex [Formula: see text] strongly (weakly) b-dominates block [Formula: see text] if [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) for every vert...

Back to Top