Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcomes after Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

View through CrossRef
Background: Body mass index has been shown to be a predictor of outcomes after subpectoral expander/implant reconstruction, with every unit increase in body mass index increasing the risk of complications by approximately 6 percent. The effect of body mass index on complications after prepectoral reconstruction has not yet been evaluated and is the purpose of this study. Methods: A total of 366 reconstructed breasts from 197 patients were stratified into five body mass index groups (normal; overweight; and class I, class II, and class III, obese) and postoperative complications were compared across the groups. Additional analyses were performed using broad classifications of body mass index into nonobese and obese in addition to normal, overweight, and obese. Body mass index as an independent predictor of complications was assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Complication rates did not differ significantly across body mass index groups when using the broad classifications. With five-group stratification, significantly higher rates of return to operating room, expander/implant loss, skin necrosis, wound dehiscence, and overall complications were seen in class II and/or class III obese versus overweight patients. However, on multivariate logistic regression analyses, body mass index, as a continuous variable, did not independently predict any complication. Diabetes and smoking emerged as significant predictors of any complication, indicating that these factors, rather than body mass index, were driving the increased rates of complications seen in the high–body mass index groups. Conclusion: Body mass index alone is not a predictor of outcomes after prepectoral expander/implant breast reconstruction and should not be used to estimate risk of postoperative complications or exclude patients for prepectoral reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.
Title: Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcomes after Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
Description:
Background: Body mass index has been shown to be a predictor of outcomes after subpectoral expander/implant reconstruction, with every unit increase in body mass index increasing the risk of complications by approximately 6 percent.
The effect of body mass index on complications after prepectoral reconstruction has not yet been evaluated and is the purpose of this study.
Methods: A total of 366 reconstructed breasts from 197 patients were stratified into five body mass index groups (normal; overweight; and class I, class II, and class III, obese) and postoperative complications were compared across the groups.
Additional analyses were performed using broad classifications of body mass index into nonobese and obese in addition to normal, overweight, and obese.
Body mass index as an independent predictor of complications was assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results: Complication rates did not differ significantly across body mass index groups when using the broad classifications.
With five-group stratification, significantly higher rates of return to operating room, expander/implant loss, skin necrosis, wound dehiscence, and overall complications were seen in class II and/or class III obese versus overweight patients.
However, on multivariate logistic regression analyses, body mass index, as a continuous variable, did not independently predict any complication.
Diabetes and smoking emerged as significant predictors of any complication, indicating that these factors, rather than body mass index, were driving the increased rates of complications seen in the high–body mass index groups.
Conclusion: Body mass index alone is not a predictor of outcomes after prepectoral expander/implant breast reconstruction and should not be used to estimate risk of postoperative complications or exclude patients for prepectoral reconstruction.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Related Results

Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Tijelo u opusu Janka Polića Kamova
Tijelo u opusu Janka Polića Kamova
The doctoral disertation is dedicated to the concept of the body in the works of Janko Polić Kamov. The body is approached as a signifier system on the basis of which numerous and ...
Dual-Plane versus Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in High–Body Mass Index Patients
Dual-Plane versus Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in High–Body Mass Index Patients
Background: Breast reconstruction in patients with a high body mass index (BMI) (≥30 kg/m2) is technically challenging and is associated with increased postoperative co...
Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes
Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background: Direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction has recently experienced a resurgence in popularity because of its lower levels of postoperative pain an...
Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes
Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes
Background: Prosthetic breast reconstruction in the setting of radiotherapy is associated with poor outcomes. Until recently, prosthetic breast reconstruction was predo...
Options in Acellular Dermal Matrix–Device Assembly
Options in Acellular Dermal Matrix–Device Assembly
Summary: Prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular during the last several years. Original shortcomings and poor outcomes in the 1970...
Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
Background: Prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction has become an alternative to staged subpectoral expander-based reconstruction. Although the surgical safety of ...

Back to Top