Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Sophists

View through CrossRef
Sophistês (from sophos, “wise”) originally designated epic poets, prophets, sages, Presocratic philosophers and others with wisdom beneficial to society. Sometime after c. 450 bce it was applied to a new kind of wise people. These men were professional showmen and teachers, the first to provide education beyond the traditional basic subjects—music, poetry, physical training, and arithmetic. They were entrepreneurs, rivals, and competitors who expected to be paid. They traveled from city to city, charging fees for teaching and for their public performances. Each Sophist taught whatever subjects he wished, subjects ranging from mathematics and astronomy to grammar and literary criticism. Many Sophists had interests in language and taught techniques of reasoning, argument, and public speaking that could be useful in public and private life. They came from different cities in the Greek world. They were regarded as attractive and fascinating, but suspicious and dangerous, attitudes reflected in literature, most prominently in Plato’s writings. Plato contrasts individual Sophists with Socrates and sophistry with philosophy. The negative connotations of “sophistry,” “sophism,” and “sophist” are due ultimately to Plato’s influence and should not lead us to suppose that the Sophists engaged in and taught nothing but how to reason badly and construct misleading arguments. They were important in many areas. To them is due the beginnings of the study of language and speech, which stands at the origins of grammar and rhetoric. Others puzzled about the gods and the origins of religion. Some contributed to mathematics. Most importantly, they stand at the origins of moral, political and social philosophy, anthropology, and political theory. Plato’s negative portrayal dominated until the 20th century and the few exceptions interpreted the Sophists uncritically as forerunners of their own philosophical views. Study of the Sophists requires access to information about them, not just to the interpretations of others. This information falls into three sorts: (1) Actual words of the Sophists—complete works and excerpts from works that do not survive in their entirety; (2) summaries and paraphrases of their works; (3) reports in ancient authors of their views and other information about them; and (4) interpretations by ancient and modern authors. The first three sorts form the basis of valid research. They were collected for the first time in 1903 by Diels—Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6th ed. (1952)—which remains the basic reference point. The Sophists have been viewed from many angles which cannot all be represented adequately in this bibliography, which is intended as a guide to books and articles useful for understanding who the Sophists were, their methods, aims, and achievements, how they were viewed in antiquity, and their contributions to philosophical thought.
Oxford University Press
Title: The Sophists
Description:
Sophistês (from sophos, “wise”) originally designated epic poets, prophets, sages, Presocratic philosophers and others with wisdom beneficial to society.
Sometime after c.
 450 bce it was applied to a new kind of wise people.
These men were professional showmen and teachers, the first to provide education beyond the traditional basic subjects—music, poetry, physical training, and arithmetic.
They were entrepreneurs, rivals, and competitors who expected to be paid.
They traveled from city to city, charging fees for teaching and for their public performances.
Each Sophist taught whatever subjects he wished, subjects ranging from mathematics and astronomy to grammar and literary criticism.
Many Sophists had interests in language and taught techniques of reasoning, argument, and public speaking that could be useful in public and private life.
They came from different cities in the Greek world.
They were regarded as attractive and fascinating, but suspicious and dangerous, attitudes reflected in literature, most prominently in Plato’s writings.
Plato contrasts individual Sophists with Socrates and sophistry with philosophy.
The negative connotations of “sophistry,” “sophism,” and “sophist” are due ultimately to Plato’s influence and should not lead us to suppose that the Sophists engaged in and taught nothing but how to reason badly and construct misleading arguments.
They were important in many areas.
To them is due the beginnings of the study of language and speech, which stands at the origins of grammar and rhetoric.
Others puzzled about the gods and the origins of religion.
Some contributed to mathematics.
Most importantly, they stand at the origins of moral, political and social philosophy, anthropology, and political theory.
Plato’s negative portrayal dominated until the 20th century and the few exceptions interpreted the Sophists uncritically as forerunners of their own philosophical views.
Study of the Sophists requires access to information about them, not just to the interpretations of others.
This information falls into three sorts: (1) Actual words of the Sophists—complete works and excerpts from works that do not survive in their entirety; (2) summaries and paraphrases of their works; (3) reports in ancient authors of their views and other information about them; and (4) interpretations by ancient and modern authors.
The first three sorts form the basis of valid research.
They were collected for the first time in 1903 by Diels—Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6th ed.
(1952)—which remains the basic reference point.
The Sophists have been viewed from many angles which cannot all be represented adequately in this bibliography, which is intended as a guide to books and articles useful for understanding who the Sophists were, their methods, aims, and achievements, how they were viewed in antiquity, and their contributions to philosophical thought.

Related Results

Sophists
Sophists
This chapter examines two collective biographies of Imperial sophists: Philostratus’ Lives of Sophists (VS) and Eunapius’ Lives of Philosophers and Sophists (VPS). The VS records t...
Greek Orators on Rhetoric
Greek Orators on Rhetoric
Since the human existence, the spoken word rules the human trajectory of language even before written word, as human learns to speak first rather than to write. Thus considering th...
Lucius Flavius Philostratus
Lucius Flavius Philostratus
L. Flavius Philostratus (b. c. 170 ce–d. c. 240s), Philostratus II or “the younger,” is one of several related Philostrati; the division of works in the corpus among them is a vexe...
PUOTA: FILOSOFIJOS ĮTEISINIMO PROBLEMA
PUOTA: FILOSOFIJOS ĮTEISINIMO PROBLEMA
Straipsnyje nagrinėjama filosofijos legitimavimo problema. Iš pradžių aptariamos istorinės problemos susiklostymo prielaidos. Parodoma, kad minėtą problemą aktualizuoja Sokrato pol...
Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern
Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern
Heymann Steinthal (1823–99) was a German philologist and university professor who insisted that the development of linguistics could be properly understood only when viewed within ...
The 'Old Oligarch'
The 'Old Oligarch'
'Old Oligarch' is a label often applied to the unknown author of the Athenian Constitution preserved with the works of Xenophon. Probably written in the mid-420s B.C., it is the ea...
William James: His Humanism and Philosophy of Religion
William James: His Humanism and Philosophy of Religion
Humanism is one of the key concepts of the history of thought. It has been employed for different purposes in different eras. There are various types of it, ranging from the rhetor...
A Genealogical Analysis of Information and Technics
A Genealogical Analysis of Information and Technics
This paper explores how the concepts of information and technics have been leveraged differently by a variety of philosophical and epistemological frameworks over time. Using the F...

Back to Top