Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Jurisdictional Maze: Dual Nationality in International Investment Arbitration

View through CrossRef
p class="MsoNormal"Investors initiating investment arbitration against a host state must satisfy a series of prerequisite conditions, one of which includes being a qualified investor protected under the investment treaty. In cases of dual nationality, determining which nationality is applicable in investment arbitration can be highly complex. This complexity arises because most international investment agreements (IIAs) need to clearly define whether individuals with dual nationality are eligible to qualify as investors. A significant issue is balancing protecting investors’ rights and respecting states’ sovereignty. Principles such as the‘effective nationality’exemplified in the Nottebohm case play a crucial role in addressing dual nationality issues by highlighting the importance of the tangible connection between individuals and their countries of nationality. This article takes the dispute points in the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) case of Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) as an example. It discusses the different cases of different arbitral institutions and recent cases. These results suggest the need for more precise guidelines and more consistent application of principles to address dual nationality issues in the future. Future research should focus on developing unified criteria for nationality determination and exploring the implications of nationality issues in emerging investment scenarios.o:p/o:p
Title: The Jurisdictional Maze: Dual Nationality in International Investment Arbitration
Description:
p class="MsoNormal"Investors initiating investment arbitration against a host state must satisfy a series of prerequisite conditions, one of which includes being a qualified investor protected under the investment treaty.
In cases of dual nationality, determining which nationality is applicable in investment arbitration can be highly complex.
This complexity arises because most international investment agreements (IIAs) need to clearly define whether individuals with dual nationality are eligible to qualify as investors.
A significant issue is balancing protecting investors’ rights and respecting states’ sovereignty.
Principles such as the‘effective nationality’exemplified in the Nottebohm case play a crucial role in addressing dual nationality issues by highlighting the importance of the tangible connection between individuals and their countries of nationality.
This article takes the dispute points in the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) case of Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v.
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) as an example.
It discusses the different cases of different arbitral institutions and recent cases.
These results suggest the need for more precise guidelines and more consistent application of principles to address dual nationality issues in the future.
Future research should focus on developing unified criteria for nationality determination and exploring the implications of nationality issues in emerging investment scenarios.
o:p/o:p.

Related Results

International Investment Arbitration
International Investment Arbitration
International investment arbitration is heterogeneous. At its core, it represents the settlement of international investment disputes between foreign investors and host States by a...
The Bona Fide Investor: Corporate Nationality and Treaty Shopping in Investment Treaty Law
The Bona Fide Investor: Corporate Nationality and Treaty Shopping in Investment Treaty Law
<p>This thesis addresses the problem of treaty shopping in investment treaty law. It seeks to illustrate how the problem stems from, and can in part be resolved by, the conce...
The genesis of the concept of international commercial arbitration
The genesis of the concept of international commercial arbitration
This article is dedicated to the study and disclosure of the legal essence of international commercial arbitration as a legal phenomenon representing an alternative method of resol...
Offensive Arbitration
Offensive Arbitration
The standard critique of binding arbitration for consumer and employment disputes is that arbitration favors defendants. Arbitration often has reduced discovery, shortened statutes...
Building a Global International Arbitration Center of China: Independence, Internationalism and Immunity
Building a Global International Arbitration Center of China: Independence, Internationalism and Immunity
This paper explores contemporary issues and provides insights into arbitration as practiced in China’s cross border business and commercial domains. It employs a qualitative method...
The Mass Arbitration Illusion
The Mass Arbitration Illusion
Mass arbitration has emerged as the latest battleground in the ongoing tug-of-war between corporations and their consumers and employees regarding binding mandatory arbitration cla...
The Arbitration Clause as Super Contract
The Arbitration Clause as Super Contract
It is widely acknowledged that the purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act was to place arbitration clauses on “equal footing” with other contracts. Nonetheless, federal and state c...

Back to Top