Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Effect of Xiangbin Prescription in Gastrointestinal Function After Gynecological Abdominal Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background: Recovery of gastrointestinal function after gynecological abdominal surgery is a major clinical problem. An effective intervention to promote the rapid recovery of gastrointestinal function postoperatively is lacking. This randomized trial investigated whether Xiangbin prescription (XBP) was feasible in terms of efficacy and safety on gastrointestinal function recovery in patients after gynecological abdominal surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted, in which 190 patients with gynecological abdominal surgery who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled. They were assigned randomly to XBP group, chewing gum group or blank control group, and respectively received the following treatments: took the XBP twice a day, chewed a piece of gum for about 15 minutes each 4 hours, or received conventional western basic treatment, starting on postoperative day 1 until defecation. Three groups were compared in terms of primary outcomes including the time of the first defecation and the time of the first flatus and secondary outcomes including the level of Ghrelin (GHRL) and the incidence of postoperative complications. Meanwhile, the safety of this trial was evaluated. Results: There was no statistical difference in baseline characteristics among the three groups. For the time of the first flatus, XBP group (22.33 ± 6.68 h) showed less time compared with the chewing gum group (23.06 ± 7.37 h), while it was shorter than that in the blank control group (25.86 ± 7.93 h) with significant difference (P < 0.05). As for the time of the first defecation, XBP group (38.65 ± 12.96 h) showed shorter time significantly compared with both the chewing gum group (47.29 ± 14.50 h) and the blank control group (54.01 ± 20.32 h) (P < 0.05). For the postoperative GHRL levels, XBP group was higher than that in the chewing gum group with no significant difference and had more significant improvement of the GHRL levels at postoperative day 3 compared with the blank control group (P < 0.05). For postoperative complications, XBP group had lower incidence than the other two groups but with no significant difference. For safety evaluations, no serious adverse events occurred in the three groups. Conclusions: XBP could promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function after gynecological abdominal surgery and it is overall safe. Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered by Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with the identifier number, ChiCTR1900026327, at September 30, 2019. http://www.chictr.org.cn/.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Effect of Xiangbin Prescription in Gastrointestinal Function After Gynecological Abdominal Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Description:
Abstract
Background: Recovery of gastrointestinal function after gynecological abdominal surgery is a major clinical problem.
An effective intervention to promote the rapid recovery of gastrointestinal function postoperatively is lacking.
This randomized trial investigated whether Xiangbin prescription (XBP) was feasible in terms of efficacy and safety on gastrointestinal function recovery in patients after gynecological abdominal surgery.
Methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted, in which 190 patients with gynecological abdominal surgery who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled.
They were assigned randomly to XBP group, chewing gum group or blank control group, and respectively received the following treatments: took the XBP twice a day, chewed a piece of gum for about 15 minutes each 4 hours, or received conventional western basic treatment, starting on postoperative day 1 until defecation.
Three groups were compared in terms of primary outcomes including the time of the first defecation and the time of the first flatus and secondary outcomes including the level of Ghrelin (GHRL) and the incidence of postoperative complications.
Meanwhile, the safety of this trial was evaluated.
Results: There was no statistical difference in baseline characteristics among the three groups.
For the time of the first flatus, XBP group (22.
33 ± 6.
68 h) showed less time compared with the chewing gum group (23.
06 ± 7.
37 h), while it was shorter than that in the blank control group (25.
86 ± 7.
93 h) with significant difference (P < 0.
05).
As for the time of the first defecation, XBP group (38.
65 ± 12.
96 h) showed shorter time significantly compared with both the chewing gum group (47.
29 ± 14.
50 h) and the blank control group (54.
01 ± 20.
32 h) (P < 0.
05).
For the postoperative GHRL levels, XBP group was higher than that in the chewing gum group with no significant difference and had more significant improvement of the GHRL levels at postoperative day 3 compared with the blank control group (P < 0.
05).
For postoperative complications, XBP group had lower incidence than the other two groups but with no significant difference.
For safety evaluations, no serious adverse events occurred in the three groups.
Conclusions: XBP could promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function after gynecological abdominal surgery and it is overall safe.
Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered by Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with the identifier number, ChiCTR1900026327, at September 30, 2019.
http://www.
chictr.
org.
cn/.
Related Results
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Gynecological Malignancies in Albania: The Challenges of Cancer Care in a Low Resource Country
Gynecological Malignancies in Albania: The Challenges of Cancer Care in a Low Resource Country
Objective: This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the current state of gynecological cancers in Albania, including their epidemiology, screening, diag...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Primary renal Ewing sarcoma is an extremely rare and aggressive tumor, representing less than 1% of all renal tumors. This case report contributes valuable in...
Intra–abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients after emergency abdominal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and patient outcome
Intra–abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients after emergency abdominal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and patient outcome
Background and Objectives: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is frequently encountered in patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery and is associated with adverse outc...
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Suture is an underreported cause for tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) that can cause significant morbidity. This report describes a case of TOA arising from a silk ...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
How is missing data handled in cluster randomized controlled trials? A review of trials published in the NIHR Journals Library 1997–2024
How is missing data handled in cluster randomized controlled trials? A review of trials published in the NIHR Journals Library 1997–2024
Background:
Cluster randomized controlled trials are increasingly used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in clinical and public health research. However, m...

