Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Patient survey of value in relation to radiology: results from a survey of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) value-based radiology subcommittee

View through CrossRef
Abstract Rationale and methodology A survey of patients was carried out between January and June 2019, to better understand how patients interpret value in relation to radiology as a means to refining the concept of Value-Based Radiology (VBR) in Europe, ensure radiology’s value is properly weighted in Value-Based Health Care (VBH) metrics, and maximise the value of radiological services to patients. The survey was disseminated via various heads of radiology departments, ESR officers, patient organisations, and ESR website and social media channels. Results Responses were received from 400 patients from 22 countries. Whilst most expressed general satisfaction with the radiological services they received, certain aspects of the radiological services they received left room for improvement. Thirty-six percent of respondents reported that they were not satisfied with the information provided about the risks and benefits of procedures, and thirty-three percent reported not being satisfied with the availability of radiologists for consultation, potentially suggesting that some patients lack sufficient information to participate fully in treatment decisions. Patients were often unaware of what information they were entitled to receive. Over eighty percent of respondents were unfamiliar with the concepts of Value-Based Radiology and/or Value-Based Health Care. Conclusion In addition to procedural correctness (correct diagnosis, appropriate procedures performed), patients highly value information and communication with their radiologist (information provided about procedures, explanation of results, personal consultation). Lack of communication was found to be a cause of dissatisfaction in many cases. This could suggest a means of improving patient outcomes as measured by Value-Based Health Care metrics.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Patient survey of value in relation to radiology: results from a survey of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) value-based radiology subcommittee
Description:
Abstract Rationale and methodology A survey of patients was carried out between January and June 2019, to better understand how patients interpret value in relation to radiology as a means to refining the concept of Value-Based Radiology (VBR) in Europe, ensure radiology’s value is properly weighted in Value-Based Health Care (VBH) metrics, and maximise the value of radiological services to patients.
The survey was disseminated via various heads of radiology departments, ESR officers, patient organisations, and ESR website and social media channels.
Results Responses were received from 400 patients from 22 countries.
Whilst most expressed general satisfaction with the radiological services they received, certain aspects of the radiological services they received left room for improvement.
Thirty-six percent of respondents reported that they were not satisfied with the information provided about the risks and benefits of procedures, and thirty-three percent reported not being satisfied with the availability of radiologists for consultation, potentially suggesting that some patients lack sufficient information to participate fully in treatment decisions.
Patients were often unaware of what information they were entitled to receive.
Over eighty percent of respondents were unfamiliar with the concepts of Value-Based Radiology and/or Value-Based Health Care.
Conclusion In addition to procedural correctness (correct diagnosis, appropriate procedures performed), patients highly value information and communication with their radiologist (information provided about procedures, explanation of results, personal consultation).
Lack of communication was found to be a cause of dissatisfaction in many cases.
This could suggest a means of improving patient outcomes as measured by Value-Based Health Care metrics.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Since his death in 1922, Henry Lawson’s “spirit” has been kept alive by admirers across Australia. Over the last century, Lawson’s reputation in the academy has fluctuated yet fan ...
Introduction
Introduction
Since 1950, Survey Subcommittee III of ASTM Committee E-9 on Fatigue has been compiling each year a list of fatigue references. These lists have been published by ASTM as STP No. 9...
High Frequency Electron Spin Resonance Study of Hydrogenated Microcrystalline Silicon
High Frequency Electron Spin Resonance Study of Hydrogenated Microcrystalline Silicon
AbstractDangling bond defects (DB) in hydrogenated microcrystalline silicon (μc-Si:H) have been studied by X-band (9 GHz) Q-band (33 GHz) and W-band (90 GHz) electron spin resonanc...
Electron spin resonance study on charge ordering and spin ordering in nanocrystalline Bi0.2Ca0.8MnO3
Electron spin resonance study on charge ordering and spin ordering in nanocrystalline Bi0.2Ca0.8MnO3
Bi-based manganites Bi0.2Ca0.8MnO3 samples with different paiticle sizes were prepared by the sol-gel technique. The effect of paiticle size on the charge ordering (CO) and spin co...
Performance indicators for radiation protection management: suggestions from the European Society of Radiology
Performance indicators for radiation protection management: suggestions from the European Society of Radiology
AbstractIn 2013, the new European Basic Safety Standards Directive 2013/59/Euratom (BSS Directive), which defines the new legal framework for the use of ionising radiation in medic...

Back to Top