Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Philosophical Papers
View through CrossRef
Abstract
While well-known for his book-length work, philosopher Peter Unger’s articles have been less widely accessible. These two volumes of Unger’s Philosophical Papers include articles spanning more than 35 years of Unger’s long and fruitful career. Dividing the articles thematically, the first volume collects work in epistemology and ethics, among other topics, while the second volume focuses on metaphysics. Unger’s work has advanced the full spectrum of topics at the heart of philosophy, including epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of language and philosophy of mind, and ethics. Unger advances radical positions, going against the so-called “commonsense philosophy ”that has dominated the analytic tradition since its beginnings early in the twentieth century. In epistemology, his articles advance the view that nobody ever knows anything and, beyond that, argue that nobody has any reason to believe anything—and even beyond that, they argue that nobody has any reason to do anything, or even want anything. In metaphysics, his work argues that people do not really exist—and neither do puddles, plants, poodles, and planets. But, as Unger has often changed his favored positions, from one decade to the next, his work also advances the opposite, “commonsense” positions: that there are in fact plenty of people, puddles, plants and planets and, quite beyond that, we know it all to be true. On most major philosophical questions, both of these sides of Unger’s significant work are well represented in this major two volume collection. Unger’s vivid writing style, intellectual vitality, and fearlessness in the face of our largest philosophical questions, make these volumes of great interest not only to the philosophical community but to others who might otherwise find contemporary philosophy dry and technical.
Title: Philosophical Papers
Description:
Abstract
While well-known for his book-length work, philosopher Peter Unger’s articles have been less widely accessible.
These two volumes of Unger’s Philosophical Papers include articles spanning more than 35 years of Unger’s long and fruitful career.
Dividing the articles thematically, the first volume collects work in epistemology and ethics, among other topics, while the second volume focuses on metaphysics.
Unger’s work has advanced the full spectrum of topics at the heart of philosophy, including epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of language and philosophy of mind, and ethics.
Unger advances radical positions, going against the so-called “commonsense philosophy ”that has dominated the analytic tradition since its beginnings early in the twentieth century.
In epistemology, his articles advance the view that nobody ever knows anything and, beyond that, argue that nobody has any reason to believe anything—and even beyond that, they argue that nobody has any reason to do anything, or even want anything.
In metaphysics, his work argues that people do not really exist—and neither do puddles, plants, poodles, and planets.
But, as Unger has often changed his favored positions, from one decade to the next, his work also advances the opposite, “commonsense” positions: that there are in fact plenty of people, puddles, plants and planets and, quite beyond that, we know it all to be true.
On most major philosophical questions, both of these sides of Unger’s significant work are well represented in this major two volume collection.
Unger’s vivid writing style, intellectual vitality, and fearlessness in the face of our largest philosophical questions, make these volumes of great interest not only to the philosophical community but to others who might otherwise find contemporary philosophy dry and technical.
Related Results
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
<p>A dominant claim in the philosophical literature on trust is that we should stop thinking in terms of group trustworthiness or appropriate trust in groups. In this paper, ...
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
<p>A dominant claim in the philosophical literature on trust is that we should stop thinking in terms of group trustworthiness or appropriate trust in groups. In this paper, ...
The citation evolution law of papers published in the same year but different month
The citation evolution law of papers published in the same year but different month
ABSTRACTTo explore the citation evolution of papers published in the same year but different month, we selected papers from a discipline (physical geography), a subject (diabetes: ...
Cilvēks un franču filosofiskā antropoloģija starp Polu Rikēru un Mišelu Fuko
Cilvēks un franču filosofiskā antropoloģija starp Polu Rikēru un Mišelu Fuko
In her article “The Human Being and French Philosophical Anthropology between Paul Ricoeur and Michel Foucault”, Māra Rubene not only focuses on the ideas of the best-known philoso...
Impact of Human Behavioral Papers at Journal of Neuroscience
Impact of Human Behavioral Papers at Journal of Neuroscience
AbstractA recent policy change at Journal of Neuroscience (JN) has significantly increased editorial “desk rejections”, reducing the number of papers that are considered for public...
Alfred Tarski
Alfred Tarski
Alfred Tarski (b. 1901–d. 1983) was a Polish–American mathematician, widely regarded as one of the greatest logicians of all time. Tarski’s work has been influential in philosophy,...
The article is dedicated to the anniversary of Boris Vasilyevich Markov, the famous philosopher of Saint Petersburg, Russia. The author of the article, basing on many years of personal experience and professional communication with the hero of the day, pr
The article is dedicated to the anniversary of Boris Vasilyevich Markov, the famous philosopher of Saint Petersburg, Russia. The author of the article, basing on many years of personal experience and professional communication with the hero of the day, pr
The article examines the epistemological parameters of the phenomenon of expert examination as well as the social and cognitive features of using scientific knowledge to substantia...

