Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Practical Defeasible Reasoning for Description Logics
View through CrossRef
The preferential approach to nonmonotonic reasoning was consolidated in depth by Krause, Lehmann and Magidor (KLM) for propositional logic in the early 90's. In recent years, there have been efforts to extend their framework to Description Logics (DLs) and a solid (though preliminary) theoretical foundation has already been established towards this aim. Despite this foundation, the generalisation of the propositional framework to DLs is not yet complete and there are multiple proposals for entailment in this context with no formal system for deciding between these. In addition, there are virtually no existing preferential reasoning implementations to speak of for DL-based ontologies. The goals of this PhD are: to place the preferential approach in context w.r.t. the alternative nonmonotonic reasoning proposals, to provide a complete generalisation of the preferential framework of KLM to the DL ALC, provide a formal understanding of the relationships between the multiple proposals for entailment in this context, and finally, to develop an accompanying defeasible reasoning system for DL-based ontologies with performance that is suitable for use in existing ontology development settings.
Title: Practical Defeasible Reasoning for Description Logics
Description:
The preferential approach to nonmonotonic reasoning was consolidated in depth by Krause, Lehmann and Magidor (KLM) for propositional logic in the early 90's.
In recent years, there have been efforts to extend their framework to Description Logics (DLs) and a solid (though preliminary) theoretical foundation has already been established towards this aim.
Despite this foundation, the generalisation of the propositional framework to DLs is not yet complete and there are multiple proposals for entailment in this context with no formal system for deciding between these.
In addition, there are virtually no existing preferential reasoning implementations to speak of for DL-based ontologies.
The goals of this PhD are: to place the preferential approach in context w.
r.
t.
the alternative nonmonotonic reasoning proposals, to provide a complete generalisation of the preferential framework of KLM to the DL ALC, provide a formal understanding of the relationships between the multiple proposals for entailment in this context, and finally, to develop an accompanying defeasible reasoning system for DL-based ontologies with performance that is suitable for use in existing ontology development settings.
Related Results
Practical Reasoning for Defeasible Description Logics
Practical Reasoning for Defeasible Description Logics
Description Logics (DLs) are a family of logic-based languages for formalisingontologies. They have useful computational properties allowing the developmentof automated reasoning e...
Characteristics and processes of registered nurses’ clinical reasoning and factors relating to the use of clinical reasoning in practice: a scoping review
Characteristics and processes of registered nurses’ clinical reasoning and factors relating to the use of clinical reasoning in practice: a scoping review
Objective:
The objective of this review was to examine the characteristics and processes of clinical reasoning used by registered nurses in clinical practice, and to id...
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
In the 1980s, Pollock’s work on default reasons started the quest in the AI community for a formal system of defeasible argumentation. The main goal of this paper is to provide a l...
A characterization of collective conflict for defeasible argumentation
A characterization of collective conflict for defeasible argumentation
In this paper we define a recursive semantics for warrant in a general defeasible argumentation framework by formalizing a notion of collective (non-binary) conflict among argument...
DAMN: Defeasible Reasoning Tool for Multi-Agent Reasoning
DAMN: Defeasible Reasoning Tool for Multi-Agent Reasoning
This demonstration paper introduces DAMN: a defeasible reasoning platform available on the web. It is geared towards decision making where each agent has its own knowledge base tha...
Overinterpreting Logics
Overinterpreting Logics
Paraconsistent logics, minimally, are not explosive; that is, on these logics, not everything follows from a contradiction of the form ‘A and not-A’. Dialetheists, who argue that s...
Approaching the Construction of Arguments in Postgraduate Education Programs
Approaching the Construction of Arguments in Postgraduate Education Programs
Constructing arguments, applying logical reasoning, and developing intellectual skills are fundamental to academic success in postgraduate education and qualitative research. The s...
Optimisation in Neurosymbolic Learning Systems
Optimisation in Neurosymbolic Learning Systems
In the last few years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has reached the public consciousness through high-profile applications such as chatbots, image generators, speech synthesis and ...

