Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The interplay between the second payment services directive, the national Romanian law on the payment services and GDPR
View through CrossRef
The second Payment Services Directive [Payment Services Directive (Directive 2015/2366/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of the 23rd of December 2015, hereinafter ‘PSD2’] provided new rules for the market for payment services, including rules that allow new payment service providers to obtain access to payment accounts of data subjects for the purposes of providing the said services. The PSD2 rules regarding the payment services providers were transposed in the Romanian national law in 2019 by means of Law no. 209/2019 on the payment services (hereinafter ‘Law no. 209/2019’), and National Bank of Romania Regulation no. 4/2019 regarding payment institutions and specialized suppliers in account information services (hereinafter ‘Regulation no. 4/2019’). Regarding data protection, in accordance with Article 94 para. (1) of the PSD2 and art. 217 of Law no. 209/2019, any processing of personal data, including the provision of information about the processing shall be carried out in accordance with the GDPR and with Regulation (EU) No. 2018/1725. However, in addition to that, both PSD2 and Law no. 209/2019 provide for certain specific rules regarding consent, security, sensitive payment data, and silent party data, among others. Therefore, the paper will analyse the interplay and overlap in the regulatory regimes regarding the legal basis for processing data, the conditions for explicit consent, the processing of silent party data, the processing of special categories of data and sensitive payment data, and the way the payment service providers shall ensure data minimization, security, and transparency.
Title: The interplay between the second payment services directive, the national Romanian law on the payment services and GDPR
Description:
The second Payment Services Directive [Payment Services Directive (Directive 2015/2366/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of the 23rd of December 2015, hereinafter ‘PSD2’] provided new rules for the market for payment services, including rules that allow new payment service providers to obtain access to payment accounts of data subjects for the purposes of providing the said services.
The PSD2 rules regarding the payment services providers were transposed in the Romanian national law in 2019 by means of Law no.
209/2019 on the payment services (hereinafter ‘Law no.
209/2019’), and National Bank of Romania Regulation no.
4/2019 regarding payment institutions and specialized suppliers in account information services (hereinafter ‘Regulation no.
4/2019’).
Regarding data protection, in accordance with Article 94 para.
(1) of the PSD2 and art.
217 of Law no.
209/2019, any processing of personal data, including the provision of information about the processing shall be carried out in accordance with the GDPR and with Regulation (EU) No.
2018/1725.
However, in addition to that, both PSD2 and Law no.
209/2019 provide for certain specific rules regarding consent, security, sensitive payment data, and silent party data, among others.
Therefore, the paper will analyse the interplay and overlap in the regulatory regimes regarding the legal basis for processing data, the conditions for explicit consent, the processing of silent party data, the processing of special categories of data and sensitive payment data, and the way the payment service providers shall ensure data minimization, security, and transparency.
Related Results
“The margin between the edge of the world and infinite possibility”
“The margin between the edge of the world and infinite possibility”
Purpose
This paper aims to explore a paradoxical situation, asking whether it is possible to reconcile the immutable ledger known as blockchain with the requirements of the General...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
Promotion and Harmonization of Antitrust Damages Claims by Directive 2014/104/EU?
Promotion and Harmonization of Antitrust Damages Claims by Directive 2014/104/EU?
Abstract
This chapter explains the contents and goals of the Antitrust Damages Directive (Directive 2014/104/EU), the corollary of the EU’s policy towards the promot...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
GDPR impact on the Romanian health clinics
GDPR impact on the Romanian health clinics
Abstract
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 came into effect on the 25 of May 2018 and changed the way both companies and consu...
DIGITAL PAYMENT SYSTEMS: A FUTURE OUTLOOK
DIGITAL PAYMENT SYSTEMS: A FUTURE OUTLOOK
Purpose- This study examines the development of digital payment systems with the evolution of communication technologies, financial institutions and fintech companies. Also, this s...
Homeland in Romanian children’s literature written in the Diaspora
Homeland in Romanian children’s literature written in the Diaspora
Romanian children’s literature has always been situated at the crossways of cultural ideologies. The Romanian texts for children lack innocence due to the implicit level of cultura...
PERAN PENTING HUKUM ISLAM DALAM PERATURAN HUKUM INDONESIA
PERAN PENTING HUKUM ISLAM DALAM PERATURAN HUKUM INDONESIA
Islamic law is a topic of conversation among both practitioners and academics. Not only in His laws but also in the procedures for establishing and implementing laws using Islamic ...


