Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Leverage and firm value

View through CrossRef
AbstractThree highly cited studies with over 6000 citations collectively report a negative relationship between the market value of the firm and leverage. Such empirical findings clearly contradict the hypothesis of leverage adding value to the firm and an optimal capital structure that maximizes firm value—these findings have yet to be resolved. Employing a sample of 3,768 firms consisting of 39,015 observations, a stochastic frontier analysis was used to assess the relationship of leverage among other capital structure factors with firm value. It was found that in general the use of leverage promotes firm value, consistent with the trade‐off theory and that the inverse relationship between leverage and firm value was a temporary occurrence and is likely attributable to firms employing tax loss carrybacks in response to the 1986 Tax Reform Act. The estimates of technical efficiency indicate that many firms can do more to increase their value, the sample as a whole improves efficiency (value) over the sample period. The findings reconcile the reports of leverage decreasing firm value as reported in Baker and Wurgler, Fama and French, and Habib and Ljungqvist. The empirical findings suggest prior observation was a due to a decline in the value of the tax shield generated by leverage after the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Specifically, tax carrybacks extended the pre‐Tax Reform Act of 1986 tax shield value to 1991 and after 1991 the tax shield value declined.
Title: Leverage and firm value
Description:
AbstractThree highly cited studies with over 6000 citations collectively report a negative relationship between the market value of the firm and leverage.
Such empirical findings clearly contradict the hypothesis of leverage adding value to the firm and an optimal capital structure that maximizes firm value—these findings have yet to be resolved.
Employing a sample of 3,768 firms consisting of 39,015 observations, a stochastic frontier analysis was used to assess the relationship of leverage among other capital structure factors with firm value.
It was found that in general the use of leverage promotes firm value, consistent with the trade‐off theory and that the inverse relationship between leverage and firm value was a temporary occurrence and is likely attributable to firms employing tax loss carrybacks in response to the 1986 Tax Reform Act.
The estimates of technical efficiency indicate that many firms can do more to increase their value, the sample as a whole improves efficiency (value) over the sample period.
The findings reconcile the reports of leverage decreasing firm value as reported in Baker and Wurgler, Fama and French, and Habib and Ljungqvist.
The empirical findings suggest prior observation was a due to a decline in the value of the tax shield generated by leverage after the Tax Reform Act of 1986.
Specifically, tax carrybacks extended the pre‐Tax Reform Act of 1986 tax shield value to 1991 and after 1991 the tax shield value declined.

Related Results

Corporate Financing and Firm Efficiency: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach
Corporate Financing and Firm Efficiency: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach
This study investigates the endogenous determination of firm efficiency and leverage while testing the competing hypotheses of agency cost, efficiency-risk and franchise-value, in ...
An empirical investigation on the impact of capital structure on firm performance: evidence from Malaysia
An empirical investigation on the impact of capital structure on firm performance: evidence from Malaysia
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between leverage and firm’s performance in Malaysia by framing the relationship under the tradeoff theory and agenc...
The Effect of Dividend Policy, Liquidity, Leverage on Company Value
The Effect of Dividend Policy, Liquidity, Leverage on Company Value
This study aims to determine the effect of dividend policy as measured by DPR, liquidity as measured by CR, and leverage as measured by DER on profitability as measured by ROE and ...
Pengaruh Capital Structure, Profitability, Firm Size, Dan Firm Growth Terhadap Firm Value
Pengaruh Capital Structure, Profitability, Firm Size, Dan Firm Growth Terhadap Firm Value
The purpose of this study is to obtain empirical evidence regarding the effect of capital structure, profitability, firm size, and firm growth on firm value in manufacturing compan...
Restructuring The Company’s Financial Performance Through Corporate Actions of Construction Sector BUMN Companies In 2017-2023
Restructuring The Company’s Financial Performance Through Corporate Actions of Construction Sector BUMN Companies In 2017-2023
This study aims to analyse the effect of financial performance of BUMN Construction on firm value before and after merging. This study uses moderating variables, namely mergers as ...
The Interplay of Leverage, Financing Constraints and Real Earnings Management: A Panel Data Approach
The Interplay of Leverage, Financing Constraints and Real Earnings Management: A Panel Data Approach
Organizations are formed to gain long-term benefits. However, sometimes myopic management for feigned value enhancement led to the early demise of the firm. Further, to the best of...
Analyzing Profitability, Firm Size, and Capital Structure’s Impact on Firm Value
Analyzing Profitability, Firm Size, and Capital Structure’s Impact on Firm Value
General Background: Firm value is a crucial indicator of corporate performance, influenced by profitability, firm size, and capital structure. Understanding these relationships is ...

Back to Top