Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Misinformation Analysis and Online Quality Theory (A Wittgensteinian Approach)
View through CrossRef
Online platforms initially left content consumers to discern for themselves whether information online was true or false. Censoring of content by online platforms and fact-checking are presently the two prominent interventions. We propose here that misinformation analysis should aim to make clear what is stated by clarifying the propositions and claims in such content (declarative language/factual discourse). The early work of Ludwig Wittgenstein is relevant for such analysis. Presented here is an online content information quality check model for written (non-graphical) content. This hypothesis-driven intervention can be applied to Web browsers (as extensions) and online social media platforms. This model is inspired by Wittgenstein’s book Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Our hypothesis is that rating and labelling online content this way will help users discern content qualitatively (avoid being misinformed) and engage better with other users. This Wittgensteinian model (set of rules/quality check/algorithm) can also be viewed as a tentative theory of information quality anticipating future natural language processing (NLP) technology more effective against online misinformation. We introduce two new concepts: “off-information” and “non-information” as distinct information disorder variants.
Title: Misinformation Analysis and Online Quality Theory (A Wittgensteinian Approach)
Description:
Online platforms initially left content consumers to discern for themselves whether information online was true or false.
Censoring of content by online platforms and fact-checking are presently the two prominent interventions.
We propose here that misinformation analysis should aim to make clear what is stated by clarifying the propositions and claims in such content (declarative language/factual discourse).
The early work of Ludwig Wittgenstein is relevant for such analysis.
Presented here is an online content information quality check model for written (non-graphical) content.
This hypothesis-driven intervention can be applied to Web browsers (as extensions) and online social media platforms.
This model is inspired by Wittgenstein’s book Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.
Our hypothesis is that rating and labelling online content this way will help users discern content qualitatively (avoid being misinformed) and engage better with other users.
This Wittgensteinian model (set of rules/quality check/algorithm) can also be viewed as a tentative theory of information quality anticipating future natural language processing (NLP) technology more effective against online misinformation.
We introduce two new concepts: “off-information” and “non-information” as distinct information disorder variants.
Related Results
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review
Background
Although at present there is broad agreement among researchers, health professionals, and policy makers on the need to control and combat health misi...
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review (Preprint)
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Although at present there is broad agreement among researchers, health professionals, and policy makers on the need to control and combat health ...
Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses
Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses
ABSTRACTObjective: Health misinformation on social media threatens public health. One question that could lend insight into how and through whom misinformation spreads is whether c...
The Discussions of Monkeypox Misinformation on Social Media
The Discussions of Monkeypox Misinformation on Social Media
The global outbreak of the monkeypox virus was declared a health emergency by the World Health Organization (WHO). During such emergencies, misinformation about health suggestions ...
How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020)
How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020)
AbstractBuilding misinformation resilience at scale continues to pose a challenge. Gamified “inoculation” interventions have shown promise in improving people’s ability to recogniz...
Online Misinformation Analysis through Wittgensteinian Lens
Online Misinformation Analysis through Wittgensteinian Lens
We propose a novel method for online misinformation analysis based on a Wittgensteinian approach. We found no previous work that use Wittgenstein’s early philosophy for misinformat...
Ideological Exposure, Authoritarianism, and Misinformation Propagation on Social Media
Ideological Exposure, Authoritarianism, and Misinformation Propagation on Social Media
This study investigates the propagation of ideologically charged misinformation in India’s digital sphere, emphasizing the roles of prior exposure and authoritarian dispositions. A...

