Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Beach safety: can drones provide a platform for sighting sharks?

View through CrossRef
Abstract Context A series of unprovoked shark attacks on New South Wales (Australia) beaches between 2013 and 2015 triggered an investigation of new and emerging technologies for protecting bathers. Traditionally, bather protection has included several methods for shark capture, detection and/or deterrence but has often relied on environmentally damaging techniques. Heightened environmental awareness, including the important role of sharks in the marine ecosystem, demands new techniques for protection from shark attack. Recent advances in drone-related technologies have enabled the possibility of real-time shark detection and alerting. Aim To determine the reliability of drones to detect shark analogues in the water across a range of environmental conditions experienced on New South Wales beaches. Methods A standard multirotor drone (DJI Inspire 1) was used to detect shark analogues as a proxy during flights at 0900, 1200 and 1500 hours over a 3-week period. The 27 flights encompassed a range of environmental conditions, including wind speed (2–30.0 km h-1), turbidity (0.4–6.4 m), cloud cover (0–100%), glare (0–100%), seas (0.4–1.4 m), swells (1.4–2.5 m) and sea state (Beaufort Scale 1–5 Bf). Key results Detection rates of the shark analogues over the 27 flights were significantly higher for the independent observer conducting post-flight video analysis (50%) than for the drone pilot (38%) (Wald P = 0.04). Water depth and turbidity significantly impaired detection of analogues (Wald P = 0.04). Specifically, at a set depth of 2 m below the water surface, very few analogues were seen by the observer or pilot when water turbidity reduced visibility to less than 1.5 m. Similarly, when water visibility was greater than 1.5 m, the detection rate was negatively related to water depth. Conclusions The present study demonstrates that drones can fly under most environmental conditions and would be a cost-effective bather protection tool for a range of user groups. Implications The most effective use of drones would occur during light winds and in shallow clear water. Although poor water visibility may restrict detection, sharks spend large amounts of time near the surface, therefore providing a practical tool for detection in most conditions.
Title: Beach safety: can drones provide a platform for sighting sharks?
Description:
Abstract Context A series of unprovoked shark attacks on New South Wales (Australia) beaches between 2013 and 2015 triggered an investigation of new and emerging technologies for protecting bathers.
Traditionally, bather protection has included several methods for shark capture, detection and/or deterrence but has often relied on environmentally damaging techniques.
Heightened environmental awareness, including the important role of sharks in the marine ecosystem, demands new techniques for protection from shark attack.
Recent advances in drone-related technologies have enabled the possibility of real-time shark detection and alerting.
Aim To determine the reliability of drones to detect shark analogues in the water across a range of environmental conditions experienced on New South Wales beaches.
Methods A standard multirotor drone (DJI Inspire 1) was used to detect shark analogues as a proxy during flights at 0900, 1200 and 1500 hours over a 3-week period.
The 27 flights encompassed a range of environmental conditions, including wind speed (2–30.
0 km h-1), turbidity (0.
4–6.
4 m), cloud cover (0–100%), glare (0–100%), seas (0.
4–1.
4 m), swells (1.
4–2.
5 m) and sea state (Beaufort Scale 1–5 Bf).
Key results Detection rates of the shark analogues over the 27 flights were significantly higher for the independent observer conducting post-flight video analysis (50%) than for the drone pilot (38%) (Wald P = 0.
04).
Water depth and turbidity significantly impaired detection of analogues (Wald P = 0.
04).
Specifically, at a set depth of 2 m below the water surface, very few analogues were seen by the observer or pilot when water turbidity reduced visibility to less than 1.
5 m.
Similarly, when water visibility was greater than 1.
5 m, the detection rate was negatively related to water depth.
Conclusions The present study demonstrates that drones can fly under most environmental conditions and would be a cost-effective bather protection tool for a range of user groups.
Implications The most effective use of drones would occur during light winds and in shallow clear water.
Although poor water visibility may restrict detection, sharks spend large amounts of time near the surface, therefore providing a practical tool for detection in most conditions.

Related Results

Eyes on Air
Eyes on Air
Abstract We at ADNOC Logistics & Services have identified the need for a Fully Integrated Inspection and Monitoring Solution to meet our operational, safety and ...
Satellite tracking of whale sharks from Al Shaheen
Satellite tracking of whale sharks from Al Shaheen
Background The Qatar Whale Shark Research Project is a collaboration of government, industry and academia founded in 2012 to investigate anecdotal reports by Maersk Oil-platform wo...
Global shark protection
Global shark protection
Background Sharks have been exploited over decades with very little or no management at all. This had devastating effects on many shark populations around the world. A recent repor...
Best Practice Of Utilizing Drones For Surveying And Mapping In The Bahrain Oil Field
Best Practice Of Utilizing Drones For Surveying And Mapping In The Bahrain Oil Field
Abstract Surveying and mapping in the oil and gas industry is time-consuming, difficult and often dangerous. Tatweer Petroleum introduced advanced Unmanned Ariel Veh...
Shark Nursery Grounds of the Gulf of Mexico and the East Coast Waters of the United States
Shark Nursery Grounds of the Gulf of Mexico and the East Coast Waters of the United States
<em>Abstract.</em>—To identify and characterize shark nursery habitat in the coastal waters of Massachusetts, longline and shark angler surveys were conducted from 1989...
Factors Influencing Patient Safety Management Behaviors in Nursing Students
Factors Influencing Patient Safety Management Behaviors in Nursing Students
The objective of this study is to identify the critical thinking Disposition, problem-solving processes, safety motivation, patient safety management knowledge, attitudes towards p...
Differential Viral Distribution Patterns in Reproductive Tissues of Apis mellifera and Apis cerana Drones
Differential Viral Distribution Patterns in Reproductive Tissues of Apis mellifera and Apis cerana Drones
Honeybee drones are male bees that mate with virgin queens during the mating flight, consequently transferring their genes to offspring. Therefore, the health of drones affects the...
Evaluating Effects of Culture and Language on Safety
Evaluating Effects of Culture and Language on Safety
This paper (SPE 54448) was revised for publication from paper SPE 48891, prepared for the 1998 SPE International Conference and Exhibition held in Beijing, 2–6 November. Original m...

Back to Top