Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

New Insights into Global Plume Buoyancy and Heat Fluxes from Numerical Models of Plume-Lithosphere Interaction

View through CrossRef
Earth's dynamic evolution is controlled by the interplay between mantle convection and plate tectonics. While subducted plates stir the mantle, upwelling plumes can lubricate, push, and break up plates. As the surface expression of upwelling plume dynamics, the plume buoyancy flux is traditionally estimated as the cross-sectional area of the hotspot swell multiplied by plate velocity (for intraplate hotspots) or multiplied by the full-spreading rate (for ridge-centred hotspots).This classical approach implies two big assumptions: that the swell is fully isostatically compensated by the hot ponding plume material at the base of the lithosphere; and that this plume material spreads at exactly the same speed as the overriding plate moves. However, geophysical observations and numerical models demonstrate that those assumptions are wrong. Hotspot swells are largely dynamically instead of fully isostatically compensated; to some extent, swells are further compensated by sublithospheric erosion [1]. Moreover, at least some plumes spread faster than plate motion [2]. For example, evidence in the North Atlantic from prominent V-shaped ridges, ephemeral landscapes, and off-axis uplift of oceanic gateways suggests that along-axis asthenospheric velocities can be an order of magnitude faster than the full plate-spreading rate near Iceland [3]. Thus, classical estimates for the buoyancy fluxes of deep-seated mantle upwellings may be strongly biased by surface-plate velocities [4]. Alternative estimates of plume buoyancy flux assume a constant swell decay timescale [4] but without any physical underpinning. As detailed estimates of dynamic seafloor topography are now available [5], it is time to revisit the buoyancy fluxes and, thereby, the mass and heat fluxes carried by mantle plumes.Here, we explore high-resolution regional-scale geodynamic models with a free surface to study plume-ridge interaction and swell compensation. We consider composite diffusion-dislocation creep in our models. We investigate the effects of plume temperature/radius, plate velocity (or spreading rate for ridge-centred hotspots), and mantle rheological parameters on plume-lithosphere interaction and swell support. Preliminary results demonstrate that plume spreading is significantly faster than plate motion for intermediate-to-large plumes at realistic rheological conditions. From this result, we update estimates of plume buoyancy fluxes, showing that the total heat flux carried by plumes across the core-mantle boundary is significantly larger than previously thought.  Reference List1. Cadio et al., 2012; doi:1016/j.epsl.2012.10.0062. Ribe & Christensen, 1999; doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00179-X3. Poore et al., 2011; doi: 10.1038/ngeo11614. Hoggard et al., 2020; doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.1163175. Hoggard et al., 2016; doi: 10.1038/ngeo2709
Title: New Insights into Global Plume Buoyancy and Heat Fluxes from Numerical Models of Plume-Lithosphere Interaction
Description:
Earth's dynamic evolution is controlled by the interplay between mantle convection and plate tectonics.
While subducted plates stir the mantle, upwelling plumes can lubricate, push, and break up plates.
As the surface expression of upwelling plume dynamics, the plume buoyancy flux is traditionally estimated as the cross-sectional area of the hotspot swell multiplied by plate velocity (for intraplate hotspots) or multiplied by the full-spreading rate (for ridge-centred hotspots).
This classical approach implies two big assumptions: that the swell is fully isostatically compensated by the hot ponding plume material at the base of the lithosphere; and that this plume material spreads at exactly the same speed as the overriding plate moves.
However, geophysical observations and numerical models demonstrate that those assumptions are wrong.
Hotspot swells are largely dynamically instead of fully isostatically compensated; to some extent, swells are further compensated by sublithospheric erosion [1].
Moreover, at least some plumes spread faster than plate motion [2].
For example, evidence in the North Atlantic from prominent V-shaped ridges, ephemeral landscapes, and off-axis uplift of oceanic gateways suggests that along-axis asthenospheric velocities can be an order of magnitude faster than the full plate-spreading rate near Iceland [3].
Thus, classical estimates for the buoyancy fluxes of deep-seated mantle upwellings may be strongly biased by surface-plate velocities [4].
Alternative estimates of plume buoyancy flux assume a constant swell decay timescale [4] but without any physical underpinning.
As detailed estimates of dynamic seafloor topography are now available [5], it is time to revisit the buoyancy fluxes and, thereby, the mass and heat fluxes carried by mantle plumes.
Here, we explore high-resolution regional-scale geodynamic models with a free surface to study plume-ridge interaction and swell compensation.
We consider composite diffusion-dislocation creep in our models.
We investigate the effects of plume temperature/radius, plate velocity (or spreading rate for ridge-centred hotspots), and mantle rheological parameters on plume-lithosphere interaction and swell support.
Preliminary results demonstrate that plume spreading is significantly faster than plate motion for intermediate-to-large plumes at realistic rheological conditions.
From this result, we update estimates of plume buoyancy fluxes, showing that the total heat flux carried by plumes across the core-mantle boundary is significantly larger than previously thought.
  Reference List1.
Cadio et al.
, 2012; doi:1016/j.
epsl.
2012.
10.
0062.
Ribe & Christensen, 1999; doi:10.
1016/S0012-821X(99)00179-X3.
Poore et al.
, 2011; doi: 10.
1038/ngeo11614.
Hoggard et al.
, 2020; doi: 10.
1016/j.
epsl.
2020.
1163175.
Hoggard et al.
, 2016; doi: 10.
1038/ngeo2709.

Related Results

Lithosphere thickness and thermal state in Asia
Lithosphere thickness and thermal state in Asia
Thermal structure of the lithosphere reflects its long-term evolution and controls its rheology, expressed in crustal and mantle anisotropic layering as observed in many seismic to...
On the role of Black Sea Waters in controlling the North Aegean buoyancy fluxes
On the role of Black Sea Waters in controlling the North Aegean buoyancy fluxes
Understanding the processes that control the buoyancy fluxes of the Aegean Sea is important for various reasons. First, the Aegean is directly connected with the Black Sea and acts...
ACADEMIC BUOYANCY PADA MAHASISWA YANG BEKERJA DAN TIDAK BEKERJA DI JAKARTA
ACADEMIC BUOYANCY PADA MAHASISWA YANG BEKERJA DAN TIDAK BEKERJA DI JAKARTA
<p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong>: This research was conducted to test college students’ academic buoyancy, especially working college students and not working college...
Flexure Modeling of Plume Ascension on Mars
Flexure Modeling of Plume Ascension on Mars
Near the equator of Mars, between the branched valleys of Noctis Labyrinthus and Valles Marineris, a large rift system, lies a heavily fractured and eroded region, whose tectonic h...
Corona structures driven by plume-lithosphere interactions and evidence for ongoing plume activity on Venus
Corona structures driven by plume-lithosphere interactions and evidence for ongoing plume activity on Venus
In the absence of global plate tectonics, mantle convection and plume-lithosphere interaction are the main drivers of surface deformation on Venus. Among documented tectonic struct...
Broad variability in craton reworking
Broad variability in craton reworking
Cratons are commonly considered as stable parts of continents that can survive a long-term interaction with mantle convective instabilities, basal drag and plate tectonic processes...
The lithosphere of Mars
The lithosphere of Mars
La lithosphère de Mars La partie externe, rigide, et froide d'une planète est conventionnellement appelée lithosphère. Lorsque la lithosphère est soumise à des char...
Heterogeneous lithospheric mantle
Heterogeneous lithospheric mantle
&lt;p&gt;The lithosphere is a thermal boundary layer atop mantle convection and a chemical boundary layer formed by mantle differentiation and melt extraction. The two boun...

Back to Top