Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A comparison of ondansetron and lidocaine in reducing injection pain of propofol: a randomized controlled study

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Direct stimulation of the afferent nerve endings in the venous endothelium is one explanation of propofol injection pain. Previous studies found that ondansetron can also block sodium channels. This effect is similar to that of lidocaine. Objective The primary outcome was the efficacy of ondansetron compared to lidocaine and placebo for the reduction of propofol injection pain. Method This trial was conducted in 240 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I-III and aged between 18–65 years old, undergoing elective surgery, and having a 20-gauge intravenous catheter at the hand dorsum. Each group of 80 patients received 8 mg. of ondansetron in the O Group, 40 mg. of lidocaine in the L Group and normal saline in the C Group. The study medications were blindly administered to the patients through a 20-gauge intravenous catheter placed on the hand dorsum, and then 1 min later, the small dose of propofol (50 mg.) was infused via the syringe pump at a rate of 600 ml/hr. for 30 s. Following that, the syringe pump of propofol was temporarily stopped, and the patients were asked to rate their pain at the injection site. Result The incidence of pain was lowest in the L group (66.2%) compared with the O (82.5%) and the C groups (85.0%) (P < 0.01). The median pain score in the L, O, and C groups were 2 (0–4), 4 (2–5), and 4.5 (2–6), respectively (P < 0.01). The incidences of no pain, mild, moderate, and severe pain were also significantly different in the L group (33.8%, 37.5%, 21.2%, and 7.5%, respectively) compared with those in the O group (17.5%, 31.2%, 31.2%, and 20.0%, respectively) and the C groups (15.0%, 22.5%, 40.0%, and 22.5%, respectively) (P < 0.01). Conclusion Pretreatment with intravenous lidocaine, rather than ondansetron, can reduce the incidence and intensity of propofol-induced pain.
Title: A comparison of ondansetron and lidocaine in reducing injection pain of propofol: a randomized controlled study
Description:
Abstract Background Direct stimulation of the afferent nerve endings in the venous endothelium is one explanation of propofol injection pain.
Previous studies found that ondansetron can also block sodium channels.
This effect is similar to that of lidocaine.
Objective The primary outcome was the efficacy of ondansetron compared to lidocaine and placebo for the reduction of propofol injection pain.
Method This trial was conducted in 240 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I-III and aged between 18–65 years old, undergoing elective surgery, and having a 20-gauge intravenous catheter at the hand dorsum.
Each group of 80 patients received 8 mg.
of ondansetron in the O Group, 40 mg.
of lidocaine in the L Group and normal saline in the C Group.
The study medications were blindly administered to the patients through a 20-gauge intravenous catheter placed on the hand dorsum, and then 1 min later, the small dose of propofol (50 mg.
) was infused via the syringe pump at a rate of 600 ml/hr.
for 30 s.
Following that, the syringe pump of propofol was temporarily stopped, and the patients were asked to rate their pain at the injection site.
Result The incidence of pain was lowest in the L group (66.
2%) compared with the O (82.
5%) and the C groups (85.
0%) (P < 0.
01).
The median pain score in the L, O, and C groups were 2 (0–4), 4 (2–5), and 4.
5 (2–6), respectively (P < 0.
01).
The incidences of no pain, mild, moderate, and severe pain were also significantly different in the L group (33.
8%, 37.
5%, 21.
2%, and 7.
5%, respectively) compared with those in the O group (17.
5%, 31.
2%, 31.
2%, and 20.
0%, respectively) and the C groups (15.
0%, 22.
5%, 40.
0%, and 22.
5%, respectively) (P < 0.
01).
Conclusion Pretreatment with intravenous lidocaine, rather than ondansetron, can reduce the incidence and intensity of propofol-induced pain.

Related Results

A Comparison of Ondansetron and Lidocaine in Reducing Injection Pain of Propofol: A Randomized Controlled Study
A Comparison of Ondansetron and Lidocaine in Reducing Injection Pain of Propofol: A Randomized Controlled Study
Abstract Background Propofol injection pain is common. Previous studies found that ondansetron can also block sodium channels. Objective The primary outcome was the effic...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Comparison of Propofol and Sevoflurane for Insertion of LMA in Children
Comparison of Propofol and Sevoflurane for Insertion of LMA in Children
Propofol is a drug of choice for induction of laryngeal mask airway insertion due to its ability to depress oropharyngeal and cough reflexes. Sevoflurane is a no pungent inhalation...
Impact of Lidocaine Concentration on Analgesic Efficacy and Adverse Events in Dermatologic Infiltrative Anesthesia
Impact of Lidocaine Concentration on Analgesic Efficacy and Adverse Events in Dermatologic Infiltrative Anesthesia
Introduction: Infiltrative anesthesia with lidocaine plays a vital role in pain management during dermatologic procedures, ensuring patient comfort throughout the process. Objectiv...
Overview of Key Zonal Water Injection Technologies in China
Overview of Key Zonal Water Injection Technologies in China
Abstract Separated layer water injection is the important technology to realize the oilfield long-term high and stable yield. Through continuous researches and te...

Back to Top