Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Paradox of Inequality that isn’t: Rising Economic Inequality Depresses and Polarises Citizens’ Belief in Meritocracy

View through CrossRef
This study examines how rising income inequality has been impacting individuals' belief in merit-based success, using three decades of survey data from 39 advanced capitalist democracies. Challenging the seminal finding of a "paradox of inequality," we find no evidence of a positive effect of inequality on meritocratic beliefs across countries. Instead, we identify a substantively moderate but robustly negative effect of inequality on perceptions of meritocracy from within-country changes over time: as inequality rises, citizens’ belief in meritocracy declines. We further uncover that inequality does not merely induce a mean shift, but affects the shape of the distribution of meritocracy beliefs insofar as we find the proportion of sceptical perceptions of meritocratic realities to be increasing with higher levels of inequality. Our findings thus suggest that growing inequality undermines citizens’ trust in procedural fairness and contributes to an increased polarisation of attitudes and beliefs at the heart of open societies.
Center for Open Science
Title: The Paradox of Inequality that isn’t: Rising Economic Inequality Depresses and Polarises Citizens’ Belief in Meritocracy
Description:
This study examines how rising income inequality has been impacting individuals' belief in merit-based success, using three decades of survey data from 39 advanced capitalist democracies.
Challenging the seminal finding of a "paradox of inequality," we find no evidence of a positive effect of inequality on meritocratic beliefs across countries.
Instead, we identify a substantively moderate but robustly negative effect of inequality on perceptions of meritocracy from within-country changes over time: as inequality rises, citizens’ belief in meritocracy declines.
We further uncover that inequality does not merely induce a mean shift, but affects the shape of the distribution of meritocracy beliefs insofar as we find the proportion of sceptical perceptions of meritocratic realities to be increasing with higher levels of inequality.
Our findings thus suggest that growing inequality undermines citizens’ trust in procedural fairness and contributes to an increased polarisation of attitudes and beliefs at the heart of open societies.

Related Results

Organizational Paradox
Organizational Paradox
Organizational paradox offers a theory of the nature and management of competing demands. Historically, the dominant paradigm in organizational theory depicted competing demands as...
Past and Present: Thomas Carlyle, Meritocracy and the ‘China Model’
Past and Present: Thomas Carlyle, Meritocracy and the ‘China Model’
Thomas Carlyle’s knowledge of ancient Chinese literature and political thought, specifically Confucianism, helped shape his political view of heroes and meritocracy. His view of ‘ ...
Meritocracy and inequality – exploring a complex relationship
Meritocracy and inequality – exploring a complex relationship
Merytokracja i nierówności – badanie złożonej relacji Ostatnie badania sugerują, że problem nierówności wydaje sięlegitymizowany przez postawy merytokratyczne. Choćtwierdzi się, ż...
Problematyka paradoksu w myśli Henriego de Lubaca i Hansa Ursa von Balthasara
Problematyka paradoksu w myśli Henriego de Lubaca i Hansa Ursa von Balthasara
The present work examines the problematics of the role and place of paradox in dogmatic reflection based on the analysis of the works of Henri de Lubac and Hans Urs von Balthasar. ...
Walnut Rootstock Comparison and Own-rooted `Chandler' vs. `Chandler' on Paradox Rootstock
Walnut Rootstock Comparison and Own-rooted `Chandler' vs. `Chandler' on Paradox Rootstock
In a comparison of six walnut rootstocks either nursery-grafted or field-grafted to `Chandler' (Juglans regia), the highest-yielding trees after 9 years are on either seedling or c...
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
The role and significance of the Bosnian nobility in the historical currents of medieval Bosnia can be reliably traced in the 14th and 15th centuries when various socio-political f...
Meritocracy and inequality: moral considerations
Meritocracy and inequality: moral considerations
AbstractThis study investigates where religion stands in relation to economic life, characterised by meritocracy. To this end, first, the deeper logic of economic merit-retribution...
Income Inequality and Advanced Democracies
Income Inequality and Advanced Democracies
Over the past several decades, social scientists from a wide range of disciplines have produced a rich body of scholarship addressing the growing phenomenon of income inequality ac...

Back to Top