Sustainable Architecture and Human Health: A Case for Effective Circadian Daylighting Metrics

The development of the fluorescent lamp and the air-conditioning system resulted in buildings being lit inexpensively without having to rely on daylighting to save energy, as was the case during the incandescent lamp era. Consequently, architects were able to design buildings with deep floor plates for maximum occupancy, placing workstations far away from windows since daylighting was no longer a necessity. Floor-to-ceiling heights became lower to minimize the inhabitable volumes that needed to be cooled or heated. With the rising costs of land in some major American cities such as New York City and Chicago at the beginning of the twentieth century, developers sought to optimize their investments by erecting tall structures, giving rise to densely inhabited city centers with massive street canyons that limit sunlight access in the streets. Today, there is growing awareness in terms of the impact of the built environment on people’s health especially in terms of the health benefits of natural light. The fact that buildings, through their shapes and envelope, filter a large amount of daylight, which may impact building occupants’ health and well-being, should cause architects and building developers to take this issue seriously. The amount and quality of light we receive daily impacts many of our bodily functions and consequently several aspects of our health and well-being. The human circadian rhythm is entrained by intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in our eyes that are responsible for non-visual responses due to the presence of a short-wavelength sensitive pigment called melanopsin. The entrainment of the circadian rhythm depends on several factors such as the intensity, wavelength, timing, and duration of light exposure. Recently, this field of research has gained popularity, and several researchers have tried to create metrics to quantify photopic light, which is the standard way of measuring visual light, into a measure of circadian effective lighting. This paper discusses the relationship between different parameters of daylighting and their non-visual effects on the human body. It also summarizes the existing metrics of daylighting, especially those focusing on its effects on the human circadian rhythm and its shortcomings. Finally, it discusses areas of future research that can address these shortcomings and potentially pave the way for a universally acceptable standardized metric.