Javascript must be enabled to continue!
210. BIORESORBABLE SYNTHETIC MESHES IN LARGE PARAESOPHAGEAL HERNIAS. TECHNIQUE OF APLICATION AND EARLY RESULTS
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Large paraesophageal hernias (LPEH) are still a challenge faced by foregut surgeons. Surgical options are highly debated among specialists; esophageal lengthening procedures, diaphragmatic relaxing incisions, gastropexy and—mesh reinforcement. Severe complications related to synthetic meshes has led many surgeons to avoid this type of reinforcement.
However, newly developed synthetic bioresorbable meshes have been used as an alternative for hiatal reinforcement, lowering the rates of recurrence without the drawbacks of synthetic materials.
Methods
From April 2018 to February 2023, 65 patients underwent LPEH repair with hiatal augmentation with an inverted C-shape bioresorbable mesh. All surgeries were performed by two surgeons (AB and NCA). The meshes (Bio-A®—Gore® and Phasix ST®—BARD) were applied over crurorrhaphy, covering the anterior and posterior aspects of the hiatus and secured in place with sutures and cyanoacrylate. The choice of mesh was determined by the surgeon’s preference. Follow up visits were at 1, 6 and 12 months and yearly after that.
Results
There were 34 patients where Bio-A was used and 31 with Phasix. Median age (55,5 vs 54,8 years) didn’t differ between groups. LPEH were primary (PS) in 39 patients and recurrence from prior interventions (RS) in 26. Median age was higher in PS (58,6 vs 49,6 years). There were no intraoperative complications related to the use of mesh. The patients were discharged after 24–48 hours.
The average follow-up period was similar between PS and RS (10,1 vs 9,6 months).
There were three recurrences (2 Bio-A, 1 Phasix) in PS (7,6%) and seven (26,9%) in RS (2 Bio-A, 5 Phasix).
There weren’t complaints of prolonged dysphagia or need for dilatation.
Nine out of 10 recurrences are small. One large recurrence, required reintervention for acute volvulus after 1 year (RS group with Phasix).
Conclusion
bioresorbable meshes are safe to use as a reinforcement of hiatoplasty in LPEH. They can reduce recurrence and reoperation rates in PS at a short term follow-up. Large recurrent hiatal hernias still present as a major challenge and adjuvant techniques should be employed to further reduce recurrences.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: 210. BIORESORBABLE SYNTHETIC MESHES IN LARGE PARAESOPHAGEAL HERNIAS. TECHNIQUE OF APLICATION AND EARLY RESULTS
Description:
Abstract
Background
Large paraesophageal hernias (LPEH) are still a challenge faced by foregut surgeons.
Surgical options are highly debated among specialists; esophageal lengthening procedures, diaphragmatic relaxing incisions, gastropexy and—mesh reinforcement.
Severe complications related to synthetic meshes has led many surgeons to avoid this type of reinforcement.
However, newly developed synthetic bioresorbable meshes have been used as an alternative for hiatal reinforcement, lowering the rates of recurrence without the drawbacks of synthetic materials.
Methods
From April 2018 to February 2023, 65 patients underwent LPEH repair with hiatal augmentation with an inverted C-shape bioresorbable mesh.
All surgeries were performed by two surgeons (AB and NCA).
The meshes (Bio-A®—Gore® and Phasix ST®—BARD) were applied over crurorrhaphy, covering the anterior and posterior aspects of the hiatus and secured in place with sutures and cyanoacrylate.
The choice of mesh was determined by the surgeon’s preference.
Follow up visits were at 1, 6 and 12 months and yearly after that.
Results
There were 34 patients where Bio-A was used and 31 with Phasix.
Median age (55,5 vs 54,8 years) didn’t differ between groups.
LPEH were primary (PS) in 39 patients and recurrence from prior interventions (RS) in 26.
Median age was higher in PS (58,6 vs 49,6 years).
There were no intraoperative complications related to the use of mesh.
The patients were discharged after 24–48 hours.
The average follow-up period was similar between PS and RS (10,1 vs 9,6 months).
There were three recurrences (2 Bio-A, 1 Phasix) in PS (7,6%) and seven (26,9%) in RS (2 Bio-A, 5 Phasix).
There weren’t complaints of prolonged dysphagia or need for dilatation.
Nine out of 10 recurrences are small.
One large recurrence, required reintervention for acute volvulus after 1 year (RS group with Phasix).
Conclusion
bioresorbable meshes are safe to use as a reinforcement of hiatoplasty in LPEH.
They can reduce recurrence and reoperation rates in PS at a short term follow-up.
Large recurrent hiatal hernias still present as a major challenge and adjuvant techniques should be employed to further reduce recurrences.
Related Results
Spectrum Of Hernias Among Children on The Plateau
Spectrum Of Hernias Among Children on The Plateau
Introduction: Hernia is one of the commonest congenital presentations to paediatric surgical clinics worldwide.
Most literatures on paediatric hernias discuss mainly inguinal herni...
MO674: Risk Factors for Abdominal Wall Hernias in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
MO674: Risk Factors for Abdominal Wall Hernias in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Abdominal hernias are relatively common non-infectious complications in peritoneal dialysis (PD) pa...
Bioresorbable Ceramics: Processing and Properties
Bioresorbable Ceramics: Processing and Properties
In synthetic ceramic materials, the types of interactions that occur in the
physiological environment during body implants and tissues are defined as bioinert,
bioactive, and biore...
Investigation of the Sonographic Association Between Body Mass Index and Anterior Abdominal Wall Hernias: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Investigation of the Sonographic Association Between Body Mass Index and Anterior Abdominal Wall Hernias: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Background and Aim: Abdominal wall hernias are a common abdominal condition that affect about 4–5% of people worldwide. They are among the most frequent causes of ...
A model on changes in 210Pbex depth distribution for abandoned farmland
A model on changes in 210Pbex depth distribution for abandoned farmland
<p>&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Fallout radionuclides such as <sup>137</sup>Cs and <sup>210&a...
HIATAL HERNIA, PANORAMIC REVIEW OF DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT
HIATAL HERNIA, PANORAMIC REVIEW OF DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT
Introduction: Hiatal hernia (HH) occurs frequently in the population, characterized by various non-specific symptoms, however most of these symptoms are found to be related to gast...
Abstract P4-13-15: A retrospective head-to-head comparison between TiLoop Bra/TiMesh and seragyn in 320 cases of reconstructive breast surgery
Abstract P4-13-15: A retrospective head-to-head comparison between TiLoop Bra/TiMesh and seragyn in 320 cases of reconstructive breast surgery
Abstract
Background: As an alternative option to ADMs (acellular dermal matrices) synthetic meshes are a cheaper and equally effective option in implanted breast rec...
Hérnia direta e indireta: manejo terapêutico atualizado
Hérnia direta e indireta: manejo terapêutico atualizado
Uma hérnia é uma condição patológica caracterizada pela protrusão de um órgão ou tecido através de uma abertura anormal ou enfraquecida na parede anatômica que normalmente o contém...

