Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Algebraic Surfaces and the Miyaoka-Yau Inequality

View through CrossRef
This chapter discusses complex algebraic surfaces, with particular emphasis on the Miyaoka-Yau inequality and the rough classification of surfaces. Every complex algebraic surface is birationally equivalent to a smooth surface containing no exceptional curves. The latter is known as a minimal surface. Two related birational invariants, the plurigenus and the Kodaira dimension, play an important role in distinguishing between complex surfaces. The chapter first provides an overview of the rough classification of (smooth complex connected compact algebraic) surfaces before presenting two approaches that, in dimension 2, give the Miyaoka-Yau inequality. The first, due to Miyaoka, uses algebraic geometry, whereas the second, due to Aubin and Yau, uses analysis and differential geometry. The chapter also explains why equality in the Miyaoka-Yau inequality characterizes surfaces of general type that are free quotients of the complex 2-ball.
Princeton University Press
Title: Algebraic Surfaces and the Miyaoka-Yau Inequality
Description:
This chapter discusses complex algebraic surfaces, with particular emphasis on the Miyaoka-Yau inequality and the rough classification of surfaces.
Every complex algebraic surface is birationally equivalent to a smooth surface containing no exceptional curves.
The latter is known as a minimal surface.
Two related birational invariants, the plurigenus and the Kodaira dimension, play an important role in distinguishing between complex surfaces.
The chapter first provides an overview of the rough classification of (smooth complex connected compact algebraic) surfaces before presenting two approaches that, in dimension 2, give the Miyaoka-Yau inequality.
The first, due to Miyaoka, uses algebraic geometry, whereas the second, due to Aubin and Yau, uses analysis and differential geometry.
The chapter also explains why equality in the Miyaoka-Yau inequality characterizes surfaces of general type that are free quotients of the complex 2-ball.

Related Results

Inequality in the Developing World
Inequality in the Developing World
Abstract Inequality has emerged as a key development challenge. It holds implications for economic growth and redistribution and translates into power asymmetries...
On the Chow ring of K3 surfaces and hyper-Kahler manifolds
On the Chow ring of K3 surfaces and hyper-Kahler manifolds
This chapter considers varieties whose Chow ring has special properties. This includes abelian varieties, K3 surfaces, and Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces in projective space. For K3 surf...
Is Inequality the Problem?
Is Inequality the Problem?
Abstract To a host of thoughtful observers, economic inequality is one of our most important problems and needs to be fixed. Concern about inequality’s injustice ...
Introduction
Introduction
This chapter explains that the book deals with quotients of the complex 2-ball yielding finite coverings of the projective plane branched along certain line arrangements. It gives ...
Existence of Ball Quotients Covering Line Arrangements
Existence of Ball Quotients Covering Line Arrangements
This chapter justifies the assumption that ball quotients covering line arrangements exist. It begins with the general case on the existence of finite covers by ball quotients of w...
Sense of Inequality
Sense of Inequality
We have a detailed picture of how inequality impacts people’s lives, but a much weaker sense of how people perceive, interpret and understand issues of inequality. What shapes peop...
Vector Bundles in Algebraic Geometry
Vector Bundles in Algebraic Geometry
The study of vector bundles over algebraic varieties has been stimulated over the last few years by successive waves of migrant concepts, largely from mathematical physics, whilst ...
Inequality and Green Growth
Inequality and Green Growth
This chapter examines the role of economic inequality in influencing a society’s capacity for ecological protection and green growth. Its premise is that for two similar political ...

Back to Top