Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Internetbankieren: veiligheidspercepties van gebruikers

View through CrossRef
End-user perceptions of safety and security of online banking In today’s society, full use is made of online banking. This makes safety and security of online banking an important issue. Two significant threats to users of online banking in The Netherlands are phishing and malware attacks. In this study, an end-user perspective is adopted to study customers’ perceptions regarding safety and security of online banking. A unique feature to this study is that we explore – besides other predictor variables – the relationship between online banking fraud victimization and risk perception. We have made a distinction between three types of victimization: 1) self-experienced victimization, 2) victimization of acquaintances, such as family and friends, and 3) having heard of stories in the media about online banking fraud victimization. Based on a secondary analysis of data from 1200 Dutch users of online banking, collected through an online survey, we conclude that participants perceive their risk of online banking fraud to be small. In general, participants have little experience with victimization, both themselves (2.3%) and in social settings (29.6%). Three quarters of the respondents (75.6%) are aware of victimization of online banking fraud by means of media coverage. Direct and indirect victimization, however, have almost no influence on risk perception regarding online banking fraud. Risk perception is mainly determined by perceived vulnerability, that is, the estimated probability of becoming a victim of online banking fraud. Furthermore, perceived severity or impact of online banking fraud and the degree of trust in online banking contribute to some extent to risk perception. In total, 64.0% of variance in risk perception was explained by the predictors perceived vulnerability, perceived severity, locus of control, trust in online banking, (in)direct experiences with victimization (self, acquaintances and media) and demographic variables (gender, age, educational level and work status). The results of this study may help to improve communication about risks regarding online banking.
Title: Internetbankieren: veiligheidspercepties van gebruikers
Description:
End-user perceptions of safety and security of online banking In today’s society, full use is made of online banking.
This makes safety and security of online banking an important issue.
Two significant threats to users of online banking in The Netherlands are phishing and malware attacks.
In this study, an end-user perspective is adopted to study customers’ perceptions regarding safety and security of online banking.
A unique feature to this study is that we explore – besides other predictor variables – the relationship between online banking fraud victimization and risk perception.
We have made a distinction between three types of victimization: 1) self-experienced victimization, 2) victimization of acquaintances, such as family and friends, and 3) having heard of stories in the media about online banking fraud victimization.
Based on a secondary analysis of data from 1200 Dutch users of online banking, collected through an online survey, we conclude that participants perceive their risk of online banking fraud to be small.
In general, participants have little experience with victimization, both themselves (2.
3%) and in social settings (29.
6%).
Three quarters of the respondents (75.
6%) are aware of victimization of online banking fraud by means of media coverage.
Direct and indirect victimization, however, have almost no influence on risk perception regarding online banking fraud.
Risk perception is mainly determined by perceived vulnerability, that is, the estimated probability of becoming a victim of online banking fraud.
Furthermore, perceived severity or impact of online banking fraud and the degree of trust in online banking contribute to some extent to risk perception.
In total, 64.
0% of variance in risk perception was explained by the predictors perceived vulnerability, perceived severity, locus of control, trust in online banking, (in)direct experiences with victimization (self, acquaintances and media) and demographic variables (gender, age, educational level and work status).
The results of this study may help to improve communication about risks regarding online banking.

Related Results

Numéro 85 (nl) - février 2011
Numéro 85 (nl) - février 2011
Op initiatief van de federale overheid heeft het Belgische stelsel van werkloosheidsverze-kering sinds 2004 belangrijke veranderingen ondergaan. Het principe van de toekenning van ...
De Russische inspiratie van Joris Van Severen. Deel 2
De Russische inspiratie van Joris Van Severen. Deel 2
In de oorlogsdagboeken van Joris Van Severen valt zijn belangstelling op voor bepaalde aspecten van de Russische cultuur, die weinig met elkaar gemeen hebben, met name Dostojevski ...
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical care in the Netherlands
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical care in the Netherlands
Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruption of regular healthcare leading to reduced hospital attendances, repur...
Het gebruik van VBM in middelgrote, Nederlandse productiebedrijven
Het gebruik van VBM in middelgrote, Nederlandse productiebedrijven
In dit artikel worden enkele resultaten behandeld van een onderzoek naar het gebruik van Value-Based Management (VBM) in middelgrote, Nederlandse productiebedrijven. Op basis van ...
Repliek
Repliek
Allereerst willen we opmerken dat het ons goed doet dat het boek goed (en kritisch) gelezen wordt, zoals nu door Ronald Hoekstra. We vinden het ook een uitstekend idee van KWALON o...
Het Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (QARI) ter ondersteuning van synthesen van kwalitatief onderzoek
Het Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (QARI) ter ondersteuning van synthesen van kwalitatief onderzoek
Het systematisch literatuuroverzicht (systematic review) heeft de laatste jaren enorm aan impact gewonnen in het evidence-based discours en wordt beschouwd als een belangrijke info...
Repliek
Repliek
Ten eerste willen wij Eric van Elst bedanken voor zijn zorgvuldige recensie. Hij heeft met veel oog voor detail en een open instelling ons boek gelezen en een gebalanceerde besprek...
Hoe kunnen we ouderenmis(be)handeling in België beter aanpakken?
Hoe kunnen we ouderenmis(be)handeling in België beter aanpakken?
VOORWOORD 1 -- KERN BOODSCHAPPEN 3 -- SYNTHESE 6 -- 1. INLEIDING 11 -- 1.1. EEN ONDERSCHAT PROBLEEM, DAT ONVOLDOENDE WORDT AANGEPAKT 11 -- 1.2. DOELSTELLINGEN VAN DEZE STUDIE EN ON...

Back to Top