Retrospective study of combined pelvic organ resection in the treatment of primary and recurrent pelvic malignant tumors.

e15635 Background: For locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies, combined pelvic organ resection has been used to treat rectal, bladder, gynecological and other related malignancies. As an interdisciplinary and high-risk operation, the perioperative safety and future information are often very limited. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of PE surgery in our institution. Methods: In this retrospective study, 59 patients with pelvic malignant tumors received PE surgery from July 2015 to July 2021. They were divided into two groups according to the location of the disease: rectal tumor group (n = 40) and cervical cancer group (n = 19). The baseline data, gene detection reports, pathological reports, perioperative conditions and prognosis were analyzed. The two groups were compared by independent sample t-test; Comparison between groups χ2 test, the survival curve was drawn by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log rank test. Results: Among these 59 patients treated with PE, the rectal tumor group and the cervical cancer group did not differ significantly in terms of demographics, operative time, hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, and rates of use of preoperative and intraoperative radiotherapy. Compared with the two groups, the overall incidence of postoperative complications was 37% in the group with rectal tumours and 26% in the group with perineal wound infection being the most common, cervical cancer 46% and urinary tract infection being the most common. Comparing the postoperative survival OS between patients in the rectal tumor group and those in the cervical cancer group, the former was better, with 5-year overall survival rates of 37% in the rectal tumor group and 28% in the cervical cancer group. Within the group of rectal tumours, however, there are differences in survival between patients with primary (LARC) and recurrent (lrrc) rectal tumours; Patients with LARC have shown a significant survival benefit postoperatively, with 5-year overall survival rates of 40% for patients with LARC and 27% for patients with lrrc. OS was significantly better in patients with well differentiated tumors, N0 stage, and high microsatellite instability (MSI). On the basis of univariate analysis, poorly differentiated tumor, regional lymph node dissemination, MSI, and no chemotherapy received perioperatively were significant predictors of poor survival (P < 0.05). Conclusions: PE is currently an effective treatment for pelvic malignancies with aggressive radical resection of lesions, which can effectively improve their cure rate, improve quality of life, and careful patient selection can optimize outcomes.