Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Access to and challenges in water, sanitation, and hygiene in healthcare facilities during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia: A mixed-methods evaluation
View through CrossRef
Background
Inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) in healthcare facilities (HCFs) have an impact on the transmission of infectious diseases, including COVID-19 pandemic. But, there is limited data on the status of WASH facilities in the healthcare settings of Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess WASH facilities and related challenges in the HCFs of Northeastern Ethiopia during the early phase of COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from July to August 2020. About 70 HCFs were selected using a simple random sampling technique. We used a mixed approach of qualitative and quantitative study. The quantitative data were collected by an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire and observational checklist, whereas the qualitative data were collected using a key-informant interview from the head of HCFs, janitors, and WASH coordinator of the HCFs. The quantitative data were entered in EpiData version 4.6 and exported to Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 for data cleaning and analysis. The quantitative data on access to WASH facilities was reported using WHO ladder guidelines, which include no access, limited access, and basic access, whereas the qualitative data on challenges to WASH facilities were triangulated with the quantitative result.
Results
From the survey of 70 HCFs, three-fourths 53 (75.7%) were clinics, 12 (17.2%) were health centers, and 5 (7.1%) were hospitals. Most (88.6%) of the HCFs had basic access to water supply. The absence of a specific budget for WASH facilities, non-functional water pipes, the absence of water-quality monitoring systems, and frequent water interruptions were the major problems with water supply, which occurred primarily in clinics and health centers. Due to the absence of separate latrine designated for disabled people, none of the HCFs possessed basic sanitary facilities. Half (51.5%) of the HCFs had limited access to sanitation facilities. The major problems were the absence of separate latrines for healthcare workers and clients, as well as female and male staffs, an unbalanced number of functional latrines for the number of clients, non-functional latrines, poor cleanliness and misuse of the latrine. Less than a quarter of the HCFs 15 (21.4%) had basic access to handwashing facilities, while half 35 (50%) of the HCFs did not. The lack of functional handwashing facilities at expected sites and misuse of the facilities around the latrine, including theft of supplies by visitors, were the two most serious problems with hygiene facilities.
Conclusion
Despite the fact that the majority of HCFs had basic access to water, there were problems in their sanitation and handwashing facilities. The lack of physical infrastructure, poor quality of facilities, lack of separate budget to maintain WASH facilities, and inappropriate utilization of WASH facilities were the main problems in HCFs. Further investigation should be done to assess the enabling factors and constraints for the provision, use, and maintenance of WASH infrastructure at HCFs.
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Title: Access to and challenges in water, sanitation, and hygiene in healthcare facilities during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia: A mixed-methods evaluation
Description:
Background
Inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) in healthcare facilities (HCFs) have an impact on the transmission of infectious diseases, including COVID-19 pandemic.
But, there is limited data on the status of WASH facilities in the healthcare settings of Ethiopia.
Therefore, this study aimed to assess WASH facilities and related challenges in the HCFs of Northeastern Ethiopia during the early phase of COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from July to August 2020.
About 70 HCFs were selected using a simple random sampling technique.
We used a mixed approach of qualitative and quantitative study.
The quantitative data were collected by an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire and observational checklist, whereas the qualitative data were collected using a key-informant interview from the head of HCFs, janitors, and WASH coordinator of the HCFs.
The quantitative data were entered in EpiData version 4.
6 and exported to Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.
0 for data cleaning and analysis.
The quantitative data on access to WASH facilities was reported using WHO ladder guidelines, which include no access, limited access, and basic access, whereas the qualitative data on challenges to WASH facilities were triangulated with the quantitative result.
Results
From the survey of 70 HCFs, three-fourths 53 (75.
7%) were clinics, 12 (17.
2%) were health centers, and 5 (7.
1%) were hospitals.
Most (88.
6%) of the HCFs had basic access to water supply.
The absence of a specific budget for WASH facilities, non-functional water pipes, the absence of water-quality monitoring systems, and frequent water interruptions were the major problems with water supply, which occurred primarily in clinics and health centers.
Due to the absence of separate latrine designated for disabled people, none of the HCFs possessed basic sanitary facilities.
Half (51.
5%) of the HCFs had limited access to sanitation facilities.
The major problems were the absence of separate latrines for healthcare workers and clients, as well as female and male staffs, an unbalanced number of functional latrines for the number of clients, non-functional latrines, poor cleanliness and misuse of the latrine.
Less than a quarter of the HCFs 15 (21.
4%) had basic access to handwashing facilities, while half 35 (50%) of the HCFs did not.
The lack of functional handwashing facilities at expected sites and misuse of the facilities around the latrine, including theft of supplies by visitors, were the two most serious problems with hygiene facilities.
Conclusion
Despite the fact that the majority of HCFs had basic access to water, there were problems in their sanitation and handwashing facilities.
The lack of physical infrastructure, poor quality of facilities, lack of separate budget to maintain WASH facilities, and inappropriate utilization of WASH facilities were the main problems in HCFs.
Further investigation should be done to assess the enabling factors and constraints for the provision, use, and maintenance of WASH infrastructure at HCFs.
Related Results
Potable Water Sources, Household Hygiene, and Sanitation Practices in Ikpoba Okha LGA, Edo State: Implications for Public Health and Sustainable Water Management
Omoregie, Andrew Edosa.1 Omoregie Abieyuwa Peace2 Okoro, Enyinnaya Okoro.3
1 College of Medi
Potable Water Sources, Household Hygiene, and Sanitation Practices in Ikpoba Okha LGA, Edo State: Implications for Public Health and Sustainable Water Management
Omoregie, Andrew Edosa.1 Omoregie Abieyuwa Peace2 Okoro, Enyinnaya Okoro.3
1 College of Medi
BACKGROUND
Access to potable drinking water and sufficient sanitation continues to be an urgent global concern, particularly in developing regions where con...
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract
Introduction
Telemedicine is the remote delivery of healthcare services using information and communication technologies and has gained global recognition as a solution to...
Trends and Gaps in Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Research in Ethiopia: A Bibliometric Review (2015–2025)
Trends and Gaps in Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Research in Ethiopia: A Bibliometric Review (2015–2025)
Abstract Background: Global public health concerns, including water, sanitation, and hygiene, are crucial for achieving Sustainable Development Goals 6.1 and 6.2, with research pla...
Diplomatic Claims (Eritrea v. Ethiopia), Eritrea ' s Claim 20/Ethiopia ' s Claim 8, Partial Awards; Economic Loss Throughout Ethiopia (Ethiopia v. Eritrea), Ethiopia ' s Claim 7, Partial Award; Jus ad Bellum (Ethiopia v. Eritrea), Ethiopia ' s Claims 1-8,
Diplomatic Claims (Eritrea v. Ethiopia), Eritrea ' s Claim 20/Ethiopia ' s Claim 8, Partial Awards; Economic Loss Throughout Ethiopia (Ethiopia v. Eritrea), Ethiopia ' s Claim 7, Partial Award; Jus ad Bellum (Ethiopia v. Eritrea), Ethiopia ' s Claims 1-8,
Diplomatic Claims (Eritrea v. Ethiopia), Eritrea's Claim 20/Ethiopia's Claim 8, Partial Awards. At <http://www.pca-cpa.org>.Eritrea Ethiopia Claims Commission, December 19, 2...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Health Risks and Access to Healthcare Services Among Women Sanitation Workers in Tamil Nadu
Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Health Risks and Access to Healthcare Services Among Women Sanitation Workers in Tamil Nadu
WSW’s that commonly are ignored and marginalized, though employed in cleaning and maintaining health systems to safety. Nevertheless, their
risks for morbidity and mortality, and t...
Sanitation practices and associated factors among households in Gozamin District, Northwest Ethiopia
Sanitation practices and associated factors among households in Gozamin District, Northwest Ethiopia
Abstract
Background
Adequate sanitation practices are essential for preventing infectious diseases and promoting communit...

