Javascript must be enabled to continue!
BT08 Evaluating patient satisfaction: an insightful audit of our teledermatology service in tertiary care
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The patient satisfaction survey is vital for improving and adapting the teledermatology service. We retrospectively audited a cohort of 200 patients referred on the 2-week-wait (2WW) pathway through the teledermatology service and triaged straight to surgery during the period April to June 2024. The local pathway for teledermatology includes a 2WW referral from the general practitioner, followed by macroscopic and dermoscopic images taken by community dermatology and then triaged by a senior dermatologist deciding the need for surgery. All patients received a letter from the clinician outlining the plan, a patient information leaflet on skin biopsy, and a text message from the cancer coordinator. The audit was done against the published guidance of the British Association of Dermatologists Teledermatology Quality Standards. All 200 patients were contacted directly via telephone. Patients who accepted the calls and agreed to participate received an 11-question form completed by text or during the call. We compiled a comprehensive questionnaire on all aspects of the local teledermatology process. The results were encouraging, with a response rate > 60% to all our questions. The majority of patients received a clinic letter and a skin biopsy leaflet, followed by a text message. Overall, 95% of respondents rated the experience of having photographs taken in the community as ‘good’. In total, 99% felt that the information provided before surgery was easy to understand, while 58% of respondents would still have preferred to be seen in the clinic or have a telephone call before surgery. When asked to rate the clarity and effectiveness of the communication with the surgeon on the procedure day, 100% responded that it was ‘good’ or ‘very good’. Overall, 98% of patients thought their concerns and questions about the procedure were addressed satisfactorily. When asked to rate the overall quality of care, 100% felt their care was ‘good’ or ‘very good’. Most (96%) felt the service was convenient and 94% were likely to recommend it to others. When asked to share additional comments or suggestions for improving the service, 55% of responders had positive feedback. Patients were satisfied with the care received and the communication with staff. These results highlight that our teledermatology service is fit for purpose, and the patients’ experiences and satisfaction reflect this. Patients still prefer a face-to-face or telephone appointment before the surgery; therefore, we recommend a telephone review to complete stage one consent before surgery.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: BT08 Evaluating patient satisfaction: an insightful audit of our teledermatology service in tertiary care
Description:
Abstract
The patient satisfaction survey is vital for improving and adapting the teledermatology service.
We retrospectively audited a cohort of 200 patients referred on the 2-week-wait (2WW) pathway through the teledermatology service and triaged straight to surgery during the period April to June 2024.
The local pathway for teledermatology includes a 2WW referral from the general practitioner, followed by macroscopic and dermoscopic images taken by community dermatology and then triaged by a senior dermatologist deciding the need for surgery.
All patients received a letter from the clinician outlining the plan, a patient information leaflet on skin biopsy, and a text message from the cancer coordinator.
The audit was done against the published guidance of the British Association of Dermatologists Teledermatology Quality Standards.
All 200 patients were contacted directly via telephone.
Patients who accepted the calls and agreed to participate received an 11-question form completed by text or during the call.
We compiled a comprehensive questionnaire on all aspects of the local teledermatology process.
The results were encouraging, with a response rate > 60% to all our questions.
The majority of patients received a clinic letter and a skin biopsy leaflet, followed by a text message.
Overall, 95% of respondents rated the experience of having photographs taken in the community as ‘good’.
In total, 99% felt that the information provided before surgery was easy to understand, while 58% of respondents would still have preferred to be seen in the clinic or have a telephone call before surgery.
When asked to rate the clarity and effectiveness of the communication with the surgeon on the procedure day, 100% responded that it was ‘good’ or ‘very good’.
Overall, 98% of patients thought their concerns and questions about the procedure were addressed satisfactorily.
When asked to rate the overall quality of care, 100% felt their care was ‘good’ or ‘very good’.
Most (96%) felt the service was convenient and 94% were likely to recommend it to others.
When asked to share additional comments or suggestions for improving the service, 55% of responders had positive feedback.
Patients were satisfied with the care received and the communication with staff.
These results highlight that our teledermatology service is fit for purpose, and the patients’ experiences and satisfaction reflect this.
Patients still prefer a face-to-face or telephone appointment before the surgery; therefore, we recommend a telephone review to complete stage one consent before surgery.
Related Results
Paper K-9 Pelaporan Hasil Audit dan Tindak Lanjut Audit Internal
Paper K-9 Pelaporan Hasil Audit dan Tindak Lanjut Audit Internal
Pelaporan hasil audit merupakan komponen utama dalam komunikasi dari audit internal tentang hasil audit. Untuk mengkomunikasikan hasil audit diperlukan susunan laporan, dimana hasi...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
DETERMINAN FEE AUDIT
DETERMINAN FEE AUDIT
ABSTRACT This study aims to examine the factors that affect audit fees. Factors examined include factors derived from the entity (client) and the factors derived from the auditor....
Sebuah Jurnal Audit Audit Plan, Audit Program dan Audit Prosedur Pada Harta, Utang dan Modal
Sebuah Jurnal Audit Audit Plan, Audit Program dan Audit Prosedur Pada Harta, Utang dan Modal
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana proses dan prosedur audit plan, audit program dan audit prosedur pada harta, utang dan modal. Penelitian ini juga dimaksudka...
Literature Review Pengaruh Audit Fee, Audit Tenure, Rotasi Audit, Audit Delay, Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit
Literature Review Pengaruh Audit Fee, Audit Tenure, Rotasi Audit, Audit Delay, Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit
Masih terdapat hasil audit yang kurang berkualitas dilihat dari kasus-kasus keuangan terdahulu yang melibatkan akuntan publik. Artikel ini mereview faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi ...
THE ROLE OF AUDIT ROTATION, AUDIT COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT, AUDIT CAPACITY STRESS, AND AUDIT TENURE IN DETERMINING AUDIT QUALITY
THE ROLE OF AUDIT ROTATION, AUDIT COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT, AUDIT CAPACITY STRESS, AND AUDIT TENURE IN DETERMINING AUDIT QUALITY
Abstract— The quality of audits is a crucial factor determining the credibility of financial reporting. This research aims to explore the determinants that impact audit quality for...
PENGARUH AUDIT TENURE, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, AUDIT DELAY, KOMITE AUDIT, DAN ROTASI AUDIT TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT
PENGARUH AUDIT TENURE, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, AUDIT DELAY, KOMITE AUDIT, DAN ROTASI AUDIT TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kualitas audit pada perusahaan sektor keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia, dengan fokus pada...
Abnormal audit fees and accrual and real earnings management: evidence from UK
Abnormal audit fees and accrual and real earnings management: evidence from UK
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the relationship between abnormal audit fees and accrual-based and real-based earnings management by using a sample of 1,055 UK...

