Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Evaluation of Adnexal Masses: Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses by Histopathology Versus Diagnosis by Other Imaging Tools
View through CrossRef
Background: Adnexal masses are frequently encountered in gynecological practice, presenting with diverse clinical features ranging from benign cysts to malignant tumors. An accurate preoperative diagnosis is essential for differentiating benign and malignant lesions facilitating an effective treatment strategy. The definitive diagnosis could only be achieved through post-operative histopathology. Ultrasonography (USG), especially transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), has emerged as a preferred imaging technique due to its easy availability, non-invasive nature, and real-time imaging. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic precision of USG in identifying adnexal masses, utilizing histopathology as the definitive standard. Methodology: An observational study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rawal General and Dental Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan from [start date] to [end date]. A total of 132 female patients with USG-confirmed adnexal masses were recruited using consecutive non-probability sampling techniques. The study excluded pregnant women, patients with metastatic malignancies, and those with non-operable adnexal masses. Detailed demographic data, clinical presentations, and ultrasound findings were collected. Each patient underwent surgical resection of the adnexal mass, and the specimens obtained were sent for histopathological examination. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, with results expressed as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of USG were calculated for different types of adnexal masses.Results: The mean age of the participants was 39.5 ± 10.4 years, with 61.3% being married. The predominant clinical symptom reported was abdominal or pelvic pain, observed in 76.5% of the cases, followed by post-menopausal bleeding at 33.3% and the sensation of a lump at 42.4%. Ultrasound findings indicated that a significant majority of adnexal masses exhibited a cystic morphology (68.1%), were found to be unilateral (92.4%), and were primarily derived from the ovary (87.1%). Histopathological analysis identified endometrioma as the predominant diagnosis, accounting for 21.2% of cases, with dermoid cysts following at 18.9%. Ultrasound imaging exhibited the highest sensitivity for follicular cysts at 90% and dermoid cysts at 88%. Regarding specificity, hydrosalpinx and tubo-ovarian abscesses demonstrated the highest rates, at 97% and 95%, respectively. Overall, ultrasound imaging proved to be a reliable diagnostic tool, achieving a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 89% for malignancy.Conclusion: The findings of this study emphasize the role of USG as a reliable diagnostic tool for evaluating adnexal masses, demonstrating significant sensitivity and specificity for both benign and malignant conditions. Despite its operator-dependent nature, USG remains a crucial and cost-effective tool for preoperative assessment, particularly in resource-limited healthcare settings.
Wisdom Education & Research Hub
Title: Evaluation of Adnexal Masses: Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses by Histopathology Versus Diagnosis by Other Imaging Tools
Description:
Background: Adnexal masses are frequently encountered in gynecological practice, presenting with diverse clinical features ranging from benign cysts to malignant tumors.
An accurate preoperative diagnosis is essential for differentiating benign and malignant lesions facilitating an effective treatment strategy.
The definitive diagnosis could only be achieved through post-operative histopathology.
Ultrasonography (USG), especially transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), has emerged as a preferred imaging technique due to its easy availability, non-invasive nature, and real-time imaging.
The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic precision of USG in identifying adnexal masses, utilizing histopathology as the definitive standard.
Methodology: An observational study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rawal General and Dental Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan from [start date] to [end date].
A total of 132 female patients with USG-confirmed adnexal masses were recruited using consecutive non-probability sampling techniques.
The study excluded pregnant women, patients with metastatic malignancies, and those with non-operable adnexal masses.
Detailed demographic data, clinical presentations, and ultrasound findings were collected.
Each patient underwent surgical resection of the adnexal mass, and the specimens obtained were sent for histopathological examination.
Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, with results expressed as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of USG were calculated for different types of adnexal masses.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 39.
5 ± 10.
4 years, with 61.
3% being married.
The predominant clinical symptom reported was abdominal or pelvic pain, observed in 76.
5% of the cases, followed by post-menopausal bleeding at 33.
3% and the sensation of a lump at 42.
4%.
Ultrasound findings indicated that a significant majority of adnexal masses exhibited a cystic morphology (68.
1%), were found to be unilateral (92.
4%), and were primarily derived from the ovary (87.
1%).
Histopathological analysis identified endometrioma as the predominant diagnosis, accounting for 21.
2% of cases, with dermoid cysts following at 18.
9%.
Ultrasound imaging exhibited the highest sensitivity for follicular cysts at 90% and dermoid cysts at 88%.
Regarding specificity, hydrosalpinx and tubo-ovarian abscesses demonstrated the highest rates, at 97% and 95%, respectively.
Overall, ultrasound imaging proved to be a reliable diagnostic tool, achieving a sensitivity of 81.
4% and a specificity of 89% for malignancy.
Conclusion: The findings of this study emphasize the role of USG as a reliable diagnostic tool for evaluating adnexal masses, demonstrating significant sensitivity and specificity for both benign and malignant conditions.
Despite its operator-dependent nature, USG remains a crucial and cost-effective tool for preoperative assessment, particularly in resource-limited healthcare settings.
Related Results
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
Accuracy of Multi-Detector Computed Tomography In the Diagnoses of Adnexal Masses
Accuracy of Multi-Detector Computed Tomography In the Diagnoses of Adnexal Masses
Background: Ovarian cancer is the 5th common cause of death in women. patients older than 30 years are high malignant potential group. The lifetime risk of dying from invasive ovar...
Technical Accuracy and Efficiency of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Female Adnexal Pathology in Comparison with Ultrasound
Technical Accuracy and Efficiency of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Female Adnexal Pathology in Comparison with Ultrasound
Introduction: The masses or cysts of the ovary, masses of the fallopian tube, pathology of the broadligament, and cysts of the para tubal are all referred to as adnexal masses. The...
Role of ultrasonography in diagnosis of adnexal masses
Role of ultrasonography in diagnosis of adnexal masses
Background
Adnexal masses are considered one of the most common disorders in gynecology. Ultrasound remains the most widely used imaging modality to differentiate benig...
The Role of Imaging in the Evaluation of Adnexal Masses
The Role of Imaging in the Evaluation of Adnexal Masses
Background:
Imaging plays a major role in the detection, diagnosis, and ultimate treatment
strategies of adnexal masses. As high as 10% of women in the United States undergo surgi...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Unusual Presentation of Mixed Lymphatic Malformation: A Case Report with Literature Review
Unusual Presentation of Mixed Lymphatic Malformation: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
There is a scarcity of reports on mixed lymphatic malformation. This case highlights a child with an extensive mixed lymphatic malformation, disfiguring multi...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...

