Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Community engagement in genetics and genomics research: a qualitative study of the perspectives of genetics and genomics researchers in Uganda

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Generally, there is unanimity about the value of community engagement in health-related research. There is also a growing tendency to view genetics and genomics research (GGR) as a special category of research, the conduct of which including community engagement (CE) as needing additional caution. One of the motivations of this study was to establish how differently if at all, we should think about CE in GGR. Aim To assess the perspectives of genetics and genomics researchers in Uganda on CE in GGR. Method A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted at Makerere University and Uganda Virus Research Institute. Twenty-five individuals participated, the majority being male (sixteen). Participants included nineteen genetics and genomics researchers (researchers and research coordinators), two CE officers, three nurses and one nursing counsellor. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and analyzed in a thematic manner using NVivo version 12 Plus. Study findings Thirteen of the respondents had conducted CE in their GGR in either a geographical and disease-specific community. Some respondents said CE principles are the same and there is no need for special consideration for CE in GGR. Others gave ethical issues in GGR that require special consideration for CE in such research and these were categorized into six themes: GGR is new to communities, Difficulty in communicating GGR by the researchers, Genes are shared in communities, Cultural sensitivities against GGR, Community attitude toward GGR, Some GGR studies take long to end, and Negotiation of research benefits. Special considerations for CE when conducting GGR were suggested and categorized into seven themes: creating awareness of GGR in communities, obtaining both community acceptance and individual consent, CE team composition, involve communities in solving GGR challenges, prolong CE in some GGR, develop guidelines for CE in GGR, and legal considerations on GGR. Conclusion GGR was characterized by special issues that require special CE considerations for such research.
Title: Community engagement in genetics and genomics research: a qualitative study of the perspectives of genetics and genomics researchers in Uganda
Description:
Abstract Background Generally, there is unanimity about the value of community engagement in health-related research.
There is also a growing tendency to view genetics and genomics research (GGR) as a special category of research, the conduct of which including community engagement (CE) as needing additional caution.
One of the motivations of this study was to establish how differently if at all, we should think about CE in GGR.
Aim To assess the perspectives of genetics and genomics researchers in Uganda on CE in GGR.
Method A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted at Makerere University and Uganda Virus Research Institute.
Twenty-five individuals participated, the majority being male (sixteen).
Participants included nineteen genetics and genomics researchers (researchers and research coordinators), two CE officers, three nurses and one nursing counsellor.
Data were collected using in-depth interviews and analyzed in a thematic manner using NVivo version 12 Plus.
Study findings Thirteen of the respondents had conducted CE in their GGR in either a geographical and disease-specific community.
Some respondents said CE principles are the same and there is no need for special consideration for CE in GGR.
Others gave ethical issues in GGR that require special consideration for CE in such research and these were categorized into six themes: GGR is new to communities, Difficulty in communicating GGR by the researchers, Genes are shared in communities, Cultural sensitivities against GGR, Community attitude toward GGR, Some GGR studies take long to end, and Negotiation of research benefits.
Special considerations for CE when conducting GGR were suggested and categorized into seven themes: creating awareness of GGR in communities, obtaining both community acceptance and individual consent, CE team composition, involve communities in solving GGR challenges, prolong CE in some GGR, develop guidelines for CE in GGR, and legal considerations on GGR.
Conclusion GGR was characterized by special issues that require special CE considerations for such research.

Related Results

Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
A model of dialogic public engagement with genetics and genomics research
A model of dialogic public engagement with genetics and genomics research
Genetics has long been an area of substantial scientific and clinical focus. In the UK in the last decade initiatives such as the 100,000 Genomes Project and the creation of Genomi...
Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis
Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis
BackgroundCommunity engagement has been advanced as a promising way of improving health and reducing health inequalities; however, the approach is not yet supported by a strong evi...
Guest editors' notes: Special issue on qualitative research support
Guest editors' notes: Special issue on qualitative research support
Welcome to the second issue of Volume 43 of the IASSIST Quarterly (IQ 43:2, 2019). Four papers are presented in this issue on qualitative research support. This special issue arise...
Perceived Gaps in Genetics Training Among Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists: Lessons From a National Survey
Perceived Gaps in Genetics Training Among Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists: Lessons From a National Survey
Purpose The aim of this study was to assess knowledge, self-rated confidence, and perceived relevance of genetics in the clinical practice of audiologists and speech-la...
Genomics and society: four scenarios for 2015
Genomics and society: four scenarios for 2015
This paper develops four alternative scenarios depicting possible futures for genomics applications within a broader social context. The scenarios integrate forecasts for future ge...

Back to Top