Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Does the Marriage Tax Differential Influence Same‐Sex Couples' Marriage Decisions?
View through CrossRef
AbstractObjectiveThis article evaluates whether the federal marriage tax penalty (penalty) or federal marriage bonus (bonus) affects the marriage decisions of same‐sex couples (SSCs).BackgroundExtant studies provide limited, mixed evidence that the penalty has a nominal economic effect on different‐sex couples' marriage decisions. No evidence exists indicating that the marriage bonus impacts couples' marriage decisions. We use the 2013 federal recognition of same‐sex marriage (SSM) to explore whether the penalty or bonus influences SSCs' marriage decisions.MethodTo examine the penalty or bonus influence, a difference‐in‐differences regression compares how the 2013 federal recognition of SSM (which imposes the penalty on SSCs) influenced the marriage–penalty and marriage–bonus relation for SSCs. We obtain household level data for 2012–2016 from American Community Survey's Public Use Microdata Sample and use the National Bureau of Economic Research tax simulation model to estimate each household's penalty or bonus.ResultsOur evidence indicates that the penalty is negatively related to SSCs' marriage decisions only after 2013. Overall, a 1% increase in the penalty as a percentage of household income reduces the odds of marriage by up to 6.41%. In contrast, we do not find consistent evidence that the bonus effectively encourages marriage.ConclusionOur results indicate that only the marriage tax penalty has an economically significant effect on SSCs' marriage decisions.
Title: Does the Marriage Tax Differential Influence Same‐Sex Couples' Marriage Decisions?
Description:
AbstractObjectiveThis article evaluates whether the federal marriage tax penalty (penalty) or federal marriage bonus (bonus) affects the marriage decisions of same‐sex couples (SSCs).
BackgroundExtant studies provide limited, mixed evidence that the penalty has a nominal economic effect on different‐sex couples' marriage decisions.
No evidence exists indicating that the marriage bonus impacts couples' marriage decisions.
We use the 2013 federal recognition of same‐sex marriage (SSM) to explore whether the penalty or bonus influences SSCs' marriage decisions.
MethodTo examine the penalty or bonus influence, a difference‐in‐differences regression compares how the 2013 federal recognition of SSM (which imposes the penalty on SSCs) influenced the marriage–penalty and marriage–bonus relation for SSCs.
We obtain household level data for 2012–2016 from American Community Survey's Public Use Microdata Sample and use the National Bureau of Economic Research tax simulation model to estimate each household's penalty or bonus.
ResultsOur evidence indicates that the penalty is negatively related to SSCs' marriage decisions only after 2013.
Overall, a 1% increase in the penalty as a percentage of household income reduces the odds of marriage by up to 6.
41%.
In contrast, we do not find consistent evidence that the bonus effectively encourages marriage.
ConclusionOur results indicate that only the marriage tax penalty has an economically significant effect on SSCs' marriage decisions.
Related Results
The impact of attitude towards an e-tax system on tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises: Adoption of an e-tax system as a mediator
The impact of attitude towards an e-tax system on tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises: Adoption of an e-tax system as a mediator
PURPOSE: Tax compliance is a topic of concern for many scholars all over the world. Most of them point out factors affecting tax compliance, and one significant factor is the adopt...
The Influence of Tax Knowledge, Tax Service Quality, Tax Audit, and Use of Tax Sanctions on Tax Evasion: The Case Study of KPP Pratama Seberang Ulu 1 Palembang
The Influence of Tax Knowledge, Tax Service Quality, Tax Audit, and Use of Tax Sanctions on Tax Evasion: The Case Study of KPP Pratama Seberang Ulu 1 Palembang
Tax evasion and tax avoidance and is part of tax planning which aims to reduce the amount of tax payments. As an illegal act, it is clear that tax evasion violates the law so that...
An Analysis of the Severance Tax
An Analysis of the Severance Tax
The purposes of this thesis are to examine the strengths and weaknesses of the severance tax, to study the methods of administering the severance tax and to examine the severance t...
Legal institutions and tax avoidance
Legal institutions and tax avoidance
This dissertation investigates how legal institutions influence corporate tax avoidance, contributing to a growing body of literature that recognizes the regulatory environment as ...
STRATEGI PERUSAHAAN DALAM PENGHEMATAN PAJAK
STRATEGI PERUSAHAAN DALAM PENGHEMATAN PAJAK
ABSTRAK
Dalam praktik bisnis, perusahaan mengidentikkan pembayaran pajak sebagai beban sehingga akan berusaha untuk meminimalkan beban tersebut guna mengoptimalkan laba. Mana...
The Evolution of a Corporate Tax Haven
The Evolution of a Corporate Tax Haven
The central question of my dissertation is under which conditions a tax haven emerges, persists, and disappears again. To assess this, I have examined Dutch corporate tax policy an...
Methodology of tax consultation in the aspect of activity theory of law-enforcement
Methodology of tax consultation in the aspect of activity theory of law-enforcement
Tax reforms contributed to the recognition and consolidation of the institute of the tax consultations. This created the need to research new relationships between controlling tax ...
Gender and Tax: Programming and Evidence
Gender and Tax: Programming and Evidence
Generally, policymakers and tax analysts (as well as donors concerned about gender equity) have not made proper consideration about how tax policies and tax reforms can interact wi...

