Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The biogeochemical sulfur cycle during the formation of the Mediterranean Salt Giant

View through CrossRef
<p>Sulfur is a key element to understand ocean biogeochemical processes. Since decades, numerous studies have explained sulfur isotopic variations registred in the geological record as reflecting changes in continental sulfur inputs, biogeochemical recycling of sulfur and the relative proportion of oxidized (gypsum) vs reduced (e.g. pyrite) sulfur burial fluxes. Geochemical and petrographic studies have showed that these processes were active during the formation of the Mediterranean Salt Giant (MSG), a giant salt deposit formed at the end of the Messinian period (5.9-5.33 Ma) following the restriction of hydrological exchanges between the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. To date, the biogeochemical sulfur cycle during the formation of the MSG has been investigated by analyzing the sulfur and oxygen isotope composition (δ<sup>34</sup>S and δ<sup>18</sup>O, respectively) of the sulfate ion in gypsum accumulated in the deep and marginal Mediterranean basins. In the uppermost gypsum layers (Upper Gypsum unit), significantly higher δ<sup>18</sup>O isotopic ratios (averaging at 12,7‰) than Messinian marine values suggest implications of microbial sulfate reduction activity followed by complete re-oxidation of sulfide back to sulfate in evaporated marine waters.</p><p> Nevertheless, these different microbial processes can overprint each other δ<sup>34</sup>S and δ<sup>18</sup>O isotopic signatures and could have been provoked by various type of microbial metabolisms, involving different hydrological and environmental conditions. Here we present for the first time a multiple sulfur isotope (δ<sup>34</sup>S, Δ<sup>33</sup>S, Δ<sup>36</sup>S) investigation of samples from the well-known sections of Vena del Gesso (Apennines) and Pollenzo (Piedmont basin) in order to identify and understand how microbial mechanisms were coupled during the MSG formation. We designed a simple steady-state, three-box model representing the analysed S-bearing fractions (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>, S<sup>0</sup>, FeS<sub>2</sub>) and the different hydrological and biogeochemical S fluxes involved in marginal basin S-cycling. This system of 18 equations allows us to explain the strong isotopic variations we measured (-40.2 to 25.4‰ in δ<sup>34</sup>S, -0.001 to 0.160‰ in Δ<sup>33</sup>S and -1.79 to 0.001 in Δ<sup>36</sup>S‰) as produced by a huge variability in sulfate reduction activity reflecting fluctuations in the availability of organic matter. Moreover, our results, with relatively high λ<sup>33</sup><sub>net </sub>(0.513 to 0.516) suggest than more than 90% of the hydrogen sulfide produced was re-oxidized by disproportionation reactions. Large, cyclic fluctuations of the Mediterranean hydrological cycle, and the presence of easily accessible S-compounds with a variety of oxidation states, makes the MSG a key system to understand the dynamics of the S biogeochemical cycle in the geological past.</p>
Title: The biogeochemical sulfur cycle during the formation of the Mediterranean Salt Giant
Description:
<p>Sulfur is a key element to understand ocean biogeochemical processes.
Since decades, numerous studies have explained sulfur isotopic variations registred in the geological record as reflecting changes in continental sulfur inputs, biogeochemical recycling of sulfur and the relative proportion of oxidized (gypsum) vs reduced (e.
g.
pyrite) sulfur burial fluxes.
Geochemical and petrographic studies have showed that these processes were active during the formation of the Mediterranean Salt Giant (MSG), a giant salt deposit formed at the end of the Messinian period (5.
9-5.
33 Ma) following the restriction of hydrological exchanges between the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean.
To date, the biogeochemical sulfur cycle during the formation of the MSG has been investigated by analyzing the sulfur and oxygen isotope composition (δ<sup>34</sup>S and δ<sup>18</sup>O, respectively) of the sulfate ion in gypsum accumulated in the deep and marginal Mediterranean basins.
In the uppermost gypsum layers (Upper Gypsum unit), significantly higher δ<sup>18</sup>O isotopic ratios (averaging at 12,7‰) than Messinian marine values suggest implications of microbial sulfate reduction activity followed by complete re-oxidation of sulfide back to sulfate in evaporated marine waters.
</p><p> Nevertheless, these different microbial processes can overprint each other δ<sup>34</sup>S and δ<sup>18</sup>O isotopic signatures and could have been provoked by various type of microbial metabolisms, involving different hydrological and environmental conditions.
Here we present for the first time a multiple sulfur isotope (δ<sup>34</sup>S, Δ<sup>33</sup>S, Δ<sup>36</sup>S) investigation of samples from the well-known sections of Vena del Gesso (Apennines) and Pollenzo (Piedmont basin) in order to identify and understand how microbial mechanisms were coupled during the MSG formation.
We designed a simple steady-state, three-box model representing the analysed S-bearing fractions (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>, S<sup>0</sup>, FeS<sub>2</sub>) and the different hydrological and biogeochemical S fluxes involved in marginal basin S-cycling.
This system of 18 equations allows us to explain the strong isotopic variations we measured (-40.
2 to 25.
4‰ in δ<sup>34</sup>S, -0.
001 to 0.
160‰ in Δ<sup>33</sup>S and -1.
79 to 0.
001 in Δ<sup>36</sup>S‰) as produced by a huge variability in sulfate reduction activity reflecting fluctuations in the availability of organic matter.
Moreover, our results, with relatively high λ<sup>33</sup><sub>net </sub>(0.
513 to 0.
516) suggest than more than 90% of the hydrogen sulfide produced was re-oxidized by disproportionation reactions.
Large, cyclic fluctuations of the Mediterranean hydrological cycle, and the presence of easily accessible S-compounds with a variety of oxidation states, makes the MSG a key system to understand the dynamics of the S biogeochemical cycle in the geological past.
</p>.

Related Results

Thermal Anomalies Around Evolving Salt Sheets
Thermal Anomalies Around Evolving Salt Sheets
ABSTRACT The thermal conductivity of salt is about a factor three larger than that of sediments at sediment surface temperatures. The increase of sedimentary ther...
First Look-Ahead VSP Guided Salt Dome Island Exploration Well Drilling in the UAE
First Look-Ahead VSP Guided Salt Dome Island Exploration Well Drilling in the UAE
Abstract An exploration well offshore UAE, which was the first of it's kind, was planned to be drilled from an island and within salt dome. Well planning was based o...
Analysis of Sticking and the Releasing Technology of the Composite Gypsum-Salt Rock in the Tarim Basin
Analysis of Sticking and the Releasing Technology of the Composite Gypsum-Salt Rock in the Tarim Basin
ABSTRACT: The Kuqa FoId-Thrust BeIt in Tarim Basin is verified as the most challenging geological structure for ultra-deep hydrocarbon development in China onshor...
Offshore Giant Fields, 1950-1990
Offshore Giant Fields, 1950-1990
ABSTRACT OFFSHORE GIANT FIELDS 1950 - 1990 During the past forty years...
Electrode Design for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Featuring High Sulfur Loading and Low Electrolyte
Electrode Design for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Featuring High Sulfur Loading and Low Electrolyte
The limitations encountered by insertion-compound cathodes for offering lithium batteries with an enhanced energy density at an affordable cost allow the conversion-reaction cathod...
Halokinesis Stimuluses on Petroleum System of Abu Dhabi
Halokinesis Stimuluses on Petroleum System of Abu Dhabi
Abstract Halokinesis has strongly stimuluses the Abu Dhabi petroleum system. During the Late Precambrian, the basement terranes of the Arabian and adjoining plates w...
Scenario Dependence of Biogeochemical and Biogeophysical Effects of Reforestation 
Scenario Dependence of Biogeochemical and Biogeophysical Effects of Reforestation 
Reforestation is a widely considered nature-based method for climate mitigation. The net effect of reforestation on the climate system has two components: i) biogeochemical and ii)...

Back to Top