Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Good practices for dialysis education, treatment, and eHealth: A scoping review

View through CrossRef
Background Recommendations regarding dialysis education and treatment are provided in various (inter)national guidelines, which should ensure that these are applied uniformly in nephrology and dialysis centers. However, there is much practice variation which could be explained by good practices: practices developed by local health care professionals, which are not evidence-based. Because an overview of good practices is lacking, we performed a scoping review to identify and summarize the available good practices for dialysis education, treatment, and eHealth. Methods Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL databases and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles using all synonyms for the words ‘kidney failure’, ‘dialysis’, and ‘good practice’. Relevant articles were structured according to the categories dialysis education, dialysis treatment or eHealth, and assessed for content and results. Results Nineteen articles (12 for dialysis education, 3 for dialysis treatment, 4 for eHealth) are identified. The good practices for education endorse the importance of providing complete and objective predialysis education, assisting peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients in adequately performing PD, educating hemodialysis (HD) patients on self-management, and talking with dialysis patients about their prognosis. The good practices for dialysis treatment focus mainly on dialysis access devices and general quality improvement of dialysis care. Finally, eHealth is useful for HD and PD and affects both quality of care and health-related quality of life. Conclusion Our scoping review identifies 19 articles describing good practices and their results for dialysis education, dialysis treatment, and eHealth. These good practices could be valuable in addition to guidelines for increasing shared-decision making in predialysis education, using patients’ contribution in the implementation of their dialysis treatment, and advanced care planning.
Title: Good practices for dialysis education, treatment, and eHealth: A scoping review
Description:
Background Recommendations regarding dialysis education and treatment are provided in various (inter)national guidelines, which should ensure that these are applied uniformly in nephrology and dialysis centers.
However, there is much practice variation which could be explained by good practices: practices developed by local health care professionals, which are not evidence-based.
Because an overview of good practices is lacking, we performed a scoping review to identify and summarize the available good practices for dialysis education, treatment, and eHealth.
Methods Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL databases and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles using all synonyms for the words ‘kidney failure’, ‘dialysis’, and ‘good practice’.
Relevant articles were structured according to the categories dialysis education, dialysis treatment or eHealth, and assessed for content and results.
Results Nineteen articles (12 for dialysis education, 3 for dialysis treatment, 4 for eHealth) are identified.
The good practices for education endorse the importance of providing complete and objective predialysis education, assisting peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients in adequately performing PD, educating hemodialysis (HD) patients on self-management, and talking with dialysis patients about their prognosis.
The good practices for dialysis treatment focus mainly on dialysis access devices and general quality improvement of dialysis care.
Finally, eHealth is useful for HD and PD and affects both quality of care and health-related quality of life.
Conclusion Our scoping review identifies 19 articles describing good practices and their results for dialysis education, dialysis treatment, and eHealth.
These good practices could be valuable in addition to guidelines for increasing shared-decision making in predialysis education, using patients’ contribution in the implementation of their dialysis treatment, and advanced care planning.

Related Results

Assessment of implementation of the Pradhan Mantri national dialysis Programme in Hospitals in Delhi
Assessment of implementation of the Pradhan Mantri national dialysis Programme in Hospitals in Delhi
Background: Annual-demand for haemodialysis-sessions in India is 3.4 Crores. To make Renal-care-services affordable to APL and free to BPL, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare la...
MO213GOOD PRACTICES FOR DIALYSIS EDUCATION, TREATMENT AND EHEALTH: A SCOPING REVIEW
MO213GOOD PRACTICES FOR DIALYSIS EDUCATION, TREATMENT AND EHEALTH: A SCOPING REVIEW
Abstract Background and Aims Recommendations regarding dialysis education and treatment are provided in various (inter)national ...
Ehealth Communication
Ehealth Communication
Ehealth, also known as E-health, is a relatively new area of health communication inquiry that examines the development, implementation, and application of a broad range of evolvin...
Water Use and Water Saving Strategies in Dialysis, Room for Improvement?
Water Use and Water Saving Strategies in Dialysis, Room for Improvement?
Dialysis treatment consumes a significant amount of water and energy, which entails an important waste management effort. Those variables play a relevant role on the total cost of ...
A Scoping Review Of Usability Metrics For Assessing ehealth Systems
A Scoping Review Of Usability Metrics For Assessing ehealth Systems
eHealth systems have exploded in popularity worldwide in recent years, fundamentally altering how health services are delivered. However, there has been a long discussion about wha...
Electronic Health Literacy among Patients with Dental Diseases
Electronic Health Literacy among Patients with Dental Diseases
To explore eHealth literacy and general interest in using eHealth information among patients with dental diseases. A total of 171 patients with dental diseases completed the survey...

Back to Top